Workshop-seminar, 21-24 August 2006, MEKARN-CelAgrid | Workshop on Forages for Pigs and Rabbits |
Contents |
Experiment 1 was carried out to determine the biomass
production and chemical composition of water hyacinth (WH) grown in different
environments. There were two factors: A, water environment, either river or
pond, and factor B, regeneration method, either saplings or natural
regeneration. Water environment did not affect WH yield, ether extract or ash
content of the leaves. However, WH grown on pond surfaces contained more crude
protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber than that grown in the river.
Conversely, CP of WH stem grown in the river was higher than that grown on a
pond surface. Experiment 2 was conducted in order to determine the effect of
using cooked fresh leaves and stems of WH as a supplement in commercial
concentrate diets of fattening-finishing pigs. A feeding trial was carried out
on 57-100 kg Yorkshire pigs kept in the Experimental Animal Farm of Can Tho
University. Using cooked/fresh leaves/stems of WH did not statistically affect
performance and feed efficiency of the fattening-finishing pigs (P>0.05).
Supplementing cooked or fresh WH did not affect daily weight gain, feed
efficiency or back-fat thickness of the experimental pigs.
Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) is a perennial
aquatic herb, which belongs to the family Pontedericeae. It is usually found
floating freely on the surface of fresh water or can be anchored in mud. Using
water hyacinth as a feed is one of the methods to limit the disadvantagous effects of
the plant and to provide a low-cost ingredient in animal diets. Thus, water
hyacinth is considered to be a plant for hunger and poverty alleviation in
several developing countries.
Studies have shown that the nutrients of water hyacinth are
available to ruminants. In Southeast Asia, however, some non-ruminant animals
are fed rations containing water hyacinth. In Malaysia fresh water hyacinth is
cooked with rice bran, copra cake, fish meal and then mixed with copra meal as
feed for pigs, ducks, and pond fish. Similar practices are much used in
Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand (National Academy of Sciences 1976).
The objectives of the experiment were to determine the production
and chemical composition of water hyacinth (WH) grown in different environments
and to evaluate the effects feeding fattening pigs diets containing water
hyacinth in different forms on feed intake, feed conversion ratio and daily
weight gain.
The experiment was conducted at My Hoa, in Long Xuyen City, as a
completely randomized factorial design: Factor A was water environment (river or
pond) and factor B regeneration method (saplings or natural regeneration). Each
treatment was replicated three times.
Figure 1. Growing WH in the river |
Figure 2. Growing WH in a pond |
Experiment 2 was carried out at the Experimental Farm of Can Tho University, in the Mekong Delta. Twenty Yorkshire pigs at around 60kg live weight were allocated in a completely randomized design, with 5 treatments and 4 replications (individually housed pigs)
CS: concentrate + cooked stem of WH (CS) ad libitum
FS: concentrate + fresh stem of WH (FS) ad libitum
CL: concentrate + cooked leaves of WH (CL) ad libitum
FL: concentrate + fresh leaves of WH (FL) ad libitum
The experimental pigs in all treatments were given a commercial concentrate (Table 1) and WH (Table 2) according to the proposed treatments.
Table 1. Nutrient composition of the concentrate |
||
Component |
As fed |
DM basis |
Dry matter (DM), % |
88.6 |
100 |
Crude Protein (CP), % |
15.3 |
17.3 |
Ether Extractives (EE) |
4.67 |
5.27 |
Ash, % |
6.40 |
7.22 |
Crude Fiber (CF), % |
3.33 |
3.76 |
Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), % |
11.5 |
12.9 |
Acid detergent fiber (ADF), % |
4.75 |
5.36 |
Nitrogen free extractives (NFE), % |
58.9 |
66.4 |
Ca, % |
1.89 |
2.13 |
P, % |
0.72 |
0.81 |
ME, kcal/kg DM |
|
3430 |
Table 2. Nutrient composition of experimental water hyacinth (as % except for ME which is MJ/kg DM) |
||||||
Component |
DM |
Ash |
CF |
NDF |
ADF |
|
FS*, as fed |
6.31 |
1.64 |
1.95 |
3.56 |
2.45 |
|
FS, DM basis |
100 |
18.46 |
30.9 |
56.5 |
38.9 |
|
CS**, as fed |
5.08 |
0.52 |
0.41 |
3.55 |
2.34 |
|
CS, DM basis |
100 |
10.2 |
8.11 |
69.9 |
46.1 |
|
FL, as fed |
13.8 |
1.73 |
2.65 |
6.77 |
3.21 |
|
FL DM basis |
100 |
12.7 |
19.5 |
49.9 |
24.6 |
|
CL, as fed |
8.57 |
0.91 |
1.90 |
5.01 |
2.30 |
|
CL, DM basis |
100 |
10.64 |
22.1 |
58.5 |
26.9 |
|
FS, fresh stems; CS, cooked stems; FL fresh leaves; CL cooked leaves |
The water environment did not affect WH yield, or ether extract and ash content of the leaves. However, WH grown on a pond surface contained more crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber than that grown in a river. Conversely, the CP content of WH stems grown in a river was higher than that grown on a pond surface.
Table 3. Effect of water environment and regeneration method on the productivity and chemical composition of water hyacinth |
|||||
|
River |
Pond |
|||
Productivity |
Sapling (1 month) |
Regeneration (1.5 months) |
Sapling (1 month) |
Regeneration (1.5 months) |
|
Leaves (g/m2) |
487 |
317 |
337 |
333 |
|
Stems (g/m2) |
657a |
367b |
397b |
332b |
|
Stalk (stalks/m2) |
39.7a |
70.3b |
45.0a |
80.3b |
|
Ash in leaves, % |
12.4 |
11.7 |
11.1 |
12.8 |
|
Ash in stems, % |
17.5a |
18.2a |
14.0b |
15.6c |
|
EE in leaves, % |
5.10 |
6.05 |
5.00 |
5.25 |
|
EE of stems, % |
2.17a |
4.38b |
2.84a |
2.92a |
|
CP in leaves, % |
20.6a |
23.5b |
16.2c |
17.1c |
|
CP in stems, % |
7.25a |
7.68b |
10.1c |
8.80c |
|
ADF in leaves, % |
29.8 |
27.8 |
31.7 |
30.9 |
|
ADF in stems, % |
38.5 |
37.9 |
40.1 |
37.8 |
|
NDF in leaves, % |
50.1a |
50.6a |
57.5b |
65.2c |
|
NDF in stems, % |
59.3ab |
54.1b |
64.5a |
64.2a |
|
ab Means with different letters within the same row differ significantly at the 5% level |
There was no effect of treatment on the weight gain of the finishing pigs (Table 4).
Table 4. Effect of treatment on final live weight (LW), weight gain (WG) and average daily gain (ADG) of the pigs |
||||
Treatment* |
Initial LW, kg |
Final LW, kg |
WG, kg/pig |
ADG, g |
CO |
59.3 |
96.3 |
37.0 |
755 |
CS |
57.3 |
97.8 |
40.5 |
826 |
FS |
58.5 |
100.5 |
42.0 |
857 |
CL |
59.5 |
94.8 |
35.3 |
719 |
FL |
58.5 |
98.0 |
39.5 |
806 |
P-value |
|
>0.05 |
>0.05 |
>0.05 |
In treatment CL water hyacinth intakes were higher than in treatment FS (P<0.05), with intermediate intakes in treatments CS and FL . However, there was no significant difference in total feed intake or FCR among treatments (P>0.05).
Table 5. Effects of treatment on feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of the pigs during the experiment |
||||
Treatment |
Concentrate intake, kg/pig |
Water hyacinth intake kg DM/pig |
Total feed intake, kg/pig |
FCR, kg/kg |
CO |
126 |
0 |
126 |
3.50 |
CS |
121 |
6.94bc |
128 |
3.64 |
FS |
116 |
4.15c |
120 |
2.99 |
CL |
122 |
9.46b |
132 |
3.37 |
FL |
119 |
5.94bc |
125 |
3.04 |
ab Means with different letters within the same column differ significantly at the 5% level |
There was no effect of feeding cooked or fresh water hyacinth leaves or stems on back-fat thickness (P>0.05) (Table 6).
Table 6. Effect of treatment on back-fat thickness |
|
Treatment |
Back-fat thickness, mm |
CO |
10.1 |
CS |
10.6 |
FS |
10.1 |
CL |
11.4 |
FL |
11.0 |
Water environment did not affect the yield of water hyacinth, or ether
extract and ash content of the leaves. However, water hyacinth grown on pond
surfaces contained more crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber than that
grown in a river. Conversely, the CP content of stems grown in a river was
higher than that grown on pond surfaces.
Supplementation of cooked or fresh water hyacinth in finishing diets did not affect performance and feed efficiency, and also did not decrease the concentrate intake of the pigs. The results indicate that farmers could use water hyacinth, offered ad-libitum, as a supplement for fattening pigs.
Gopal B 2002:Water hyacinth. Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Kangmin L 2002: The water hyacinth issue in China.
http://www.zeri.org
Le Thi Men et al 2002:Evaluation of water hyacinth diets for fattening
pigs in Tan Phu Thanh village. JIRCAS workshop proceedings. Can Tho
Vietnam.
Luu Huu Manh et al 2002:
Replacement of concentrate protein by water
hyacinth in the diets of growing-finishing pigs. JIRCAS workshop proceedings.
Can Tho Vietnam.
National Academy of Sciences 2002: Making aquatic seeds:
some perspectives for developing countries.
No26.
Nguyen Nhat Xuan Dung et al 2002: Water hyacinth: Ensiling techniques, its nutritive values and intake of pigs. JIRCAS workshop proceedings. Can Tho Vietnam.