MEKARN Regional Conference 2007: Matching Livestock Systems with Available Resources |
A study was conducted to observe the effects of feeding growing-finishing diets as dry feed (BS: basal diet), as fermented liquid feed (FLF), feed fermented with 4% molasses (FLF4%M), and as diets supplemented with phytase (BSPHY) and Lacobacillus (BSLAC) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, phosphorus excretion, Enterobacteria counts and Salmonella of pigs from growing to slaughter. Twenty five Pietrain x (Landrace x Yorkshire) pigs (30 ± 1.5 kg) were allocated according to a randomized complete block design to the 5 treatments with five replicates. Live weight gain, feed conversion ratio of pigs fed FLF and BS were slightly improved as compared to the BS diet. Digestibility of nutrients was not different among diets. Total phosphorus excretion was significantly reduced in FLF, BSLAC and BSPHY as compared to the BS diet. Enterobacteria counts in faeces of the pigs in FLF and FLF4%M were significantly lower than in those given BS and BSLAC. Salmonella was totally absent in faeces of all pigs. It is concluded that fermented feed tended to improved the live weight gain and feed conversion ratio, significantly reduced the Enterobacteria counts and decreased phosphorus excretion in the pig faeces.
Many studies showed that organic n acids, such as lactic acid produced from fermented liquid feed has improved the performance of pigs (Mikkelsen and Jensen 1997; Russell et al 1996); enhanced nutrient digestibility, reduced plasma urea nitrogen of pigs (Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung et al 2005) and reduced pathogens, such as Enterobacteria (Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung et al 2005) and Salmonella in pig faeces (Canibe and Jensen 2003).
Traditional diets for pigs in Vietnam are characterized by the use of high amounts rice bran, which is high in total phosphorus (1.6%, NRC 2000 and Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung 2005), mainly in the form of phytic acid (up to 90%), which is less available to the pig. Cromwell et al (1993) found that some organic acids would solubilize phytate-P and a low pH is essential for phytase action (Siener et al 2001). Fermented liquid feed produces lactic acid that may improve phytate utilization because phytase will function better at a low pH.
Therefore, the hypothesis is that fermented feed may improve phosphorus utilization and is possible to reduce organic phosphorus, nitrogen excretion and pathogens into the environment.
The aims of the study were firstly to compare the effect of natural fermented feed with using Lactobacillus spp. and commercial phytase on growth performance and feed intake of pigs. Secondly, the nutrient digestibility, nitrogen retention, plasma urea nitrogen, phosphorus excretion and prevalence of Salmonella and Enterobacteria were measured to determine the effect of fermented feeds.
25 growing pigs at a live weight of approximately 30 kg were individually penned and given the experimental diets for a period of 90 days. All pigs were vaccinated against infectious diseases before starting the experiment.
Feed:water ratio was 1:3, and soaking at room temperature (25-270C). The composition of the feed ingredient and diet formulation are presented in Table 1 and 2. Feed ingredients were purchased at the same time from a local feed company. Lactobacillus contained 2.107-2.108 CFU/kg with the commercial name Biolactyl (Bayer Company). The commercial phytase supplemented was Honophos phytase, consisting of innositol-hexaphosphate phosphohydrolase (5000UI/g) (China)
The daily allowance was set close to ad libitum to allow the pigs to take enough feed and avoid feed wasted. The diets were given in four meals at 7:30, 10:00, 13:30 and 17:00h. Refusals were recorded every meal to measure feed intake, which was calculated on a daily dry basis. Weight gains were recorded monthly. Water was freely available throughout the experiment. At the end of the growing phase, the faecal and urine samples of four days were taken and stored in a freezer at -18oC and finally pooled, thus giving 50 faecal and urine samples.
Feed samples were analysed in duplicate for dry matter (DM), ash, ether extract (EE) and phosphorus according to the standard procedures of AOAC (1984). For determination of crude protein (CP = N x 6.25) of faeces, fresh samples were analysed to avoid losing ammonia. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was analysed according to Robertson and Van Soest (1991), modified by Chai and Udén (1998). At the end of the trial, blood samples were taken via external jugular vein into test tubes containing heparin and placed in ice prior to centrifugation. Plasma was collected from blood and urea nitrogen (PUN) was analysed by an enzymatic method using urease to produce ammonia and CO2, the ammonia produced combines with 2 – oxoglutarate and NADH in presence of GLDH to yield glutamate and NAD. Faecal samples were aseptically collected at the end of the study, directly from the rectum and placed into wide-mouthed sterile bottles. For isolation and identification of Enterobacteria counts one gram of feed sample was weighed, serially diluted, and 100 ml aliquots were plated in MacConkey agar (Merck 1.05465). Enterobacteria were counted after 24-h incubation (37°C). Salmonella were increased on Muller Kauffman medium following 24 h of incubation at 30oC, and then plated on MacConkey agar (Merck 1.05465).
Table 1. Composition of feeds |
|||||||
Ingredients |
DM, % |
As % of dry matter |
|||||
Ash |
CP |
EE |
ADF |
NDF |
P |
||
Broken rice |
85.16 |
0.63 |
13.58 |
1.74 |
4.32 |
2.13 |
0.23 |
Rice bran |
87.1 |
7.67 |
15.3 |
12.2 |
25.3 |
10.4 |
1.88 |
Fish meal |
91.8 |
35.3 |
54.7 |
8.69 |
0.65 |
- |
2.26 |
Soybean meal |
87.9 |
8.49 |
48.3 |
1.80 |
11.6 |
7.49 |
0.70 |
(1)DM: dry matter; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; ADF: acid detergent fiber; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; P: phosphorus. |
Table 2: Diet formulation and composition |
||
Ingredient,% |
Growing phase |
Finishing phase |
Broken rice |
49 |
56 |
Rice bran |
32 |
30 |
Soybean meal |
10 |
8 |
Fish meal |
8 |
5 |
Premix |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Oyster shell |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Composition (% in DM, except for DM which is on “ as fed” basis) |
||
DM,% |
85.7 |
85.4 |
Ash |
6.44 |
5.10 |
CP |
17.7 |
15.4 |
EE |
5.62 |
5.20 |
ADF |
11.4 |
10.9 |
NDF |
5.12 |
4.91 |
Total P |
0.97 |
0.86 |
Available P(2) |
0.42 |
0.34 |
(1) DM: dry matter; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber. (2) Calculated as 30% of total P |
The experimental diets were allocated according to a complete block design with 5 replicates and 1 pig per replicate, thus giving 25 pigs.
All data were analysed by analysis of variance using the General Linear Model of the Minitab (version 13) software (Ryan et al 2000). If the treatment effect was significant at P<0.05, differences between means were tested with the Tukey procedure of the Minitab software
The model used was:
Yij= µ + αi + βj + εij,
where:
Yij = dependent variable, µ = general mean, αi = diet effect (i = 1, 2,. ., 5), βj = block effect (j = 1,2…5), εij = residual error
The significant differences were analysed using a Tukey test
The effect of the different dietary treatments on growth performance and feed conversion ratio (FCR), dry matter and nutrient intake of growing and finishing pigs is presented in Table 3 and Table 4. During the growing and finishing phases, pig fed the treated feeds had the same growth performance (P=0.78 and 0.86) and feed conversion ratio (FCR; P=0.25 and 0.17) as those pigs fed the BS diet. For whole period, the live weight gains were not influenced by dietary treatment (P=0.73), but tended to improved as compared to the BS diet.
During the growing period dry matter intake was not significantly influenced by dietary treatment (P=0.62), but during the finishing phase the pigs fed BSLAC had lower dry matter intake than for the other diets (P=0.04). However, this trend disappeared when calculated for overall DMI (P=0.26). Back fat thickness was not different among diets.
Canibe and Jensen (2003) reported that piglets fed NFLF were heavier than those fed FLF, while the gain/feed ratio of pigs fed FLF was improved as compared to dry feed. However, Lyber et al (2005) reported that growth performance of growers and finishers fed soaked feed was improved and FCR was reduced as compared to the dry feed. Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung et al (2005 and 2007) reported that pigs feed a fermented broken rice diet had higher daily gain than those fed dry feed, and the growth rate of pigs fed FLF in the present study was slightly higher than for the other diets. These results are in agreement with a review of Jensen and Mikkelsen (1998), where it is stated that the growth rate of pigs fed fermented feed is less consistent. The diet BSLAC did not affect gain and feed conversion as also shown by Pollmann et al (1980). Lactobacillus may have a function depending on dietary carbohydrate. Also Park et al (2001) demonstrated that Lactobacillus Acidophilus only improved feed efficiency of piglets.
The digestibility of dry matter (DMD), organic matter (OMD), crude protein (CPD), ether extract (EED), NDFD and nitrogen retention are reported in Table 5. The DMD, OMD, CPD, EED, NDFD and nitrogen retention tended to be improved in the diets FLF, FLF2%Mo, BSPHY and BSLAC, although they were not significantly different (P>0.05). Similarity, PUN was similar among diets (P=0.78). According to Hale and Newton (1979) the nutrient digestibility and PUN (Pollmann et al 1980) of pigs fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus was not different from those on the basal diet. Nguyen Thi Thu Hong and Lindberg (2007) reported that growing pigs fed fermented feed had higher crude protein digestibility than that of raw or cooked feeds. Winsen et al (2001) explained that the fermented feed enhanced the digestibility of nutrients due to a reduction of substrates for microbial growth.
Table 3: Effect of treated feeds on pig performance |
||||||
Growing phase |
BS |
FLF |
FLF2%Mo |
BSPHY |
BSLAC |
P/SE |
Live weight, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
31.6 |
31.4 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
31.2 |
|
Final |
55 |
57.4 |
55.2 |
55.6 |
55 |
|
Daily gain |
0.669 |
0.743 |
0.680 |
0.680 |
0.651 |
0.78/0.05 |
Feed conversion ratio |
2.40 |
2.11 |
2.32 |
2.42 |
2.56 |
0.25/0.17 |
Finishing phase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Live weight, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
55.0 |
57.4 |
55.2 |
55.6 |
55.0 |
|
Final |
87.8 |
91.8 |
89.2 |
88.2 |
87.4 |
|
Daily gain |
0.820 |
0.862 |
0.840 |
0.815 |
0.835 |
0.86/0.03 |
Feed conversion ratio |
2.92 |
2.99 |
2.90 |
2.88 |
2.53 |
0.17/0.13 |
Overall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
31.6 |
31.4 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
31.2 |
|
Final |
87.8 |
91.8 |
90.4 |
88.2 |
87.4 |
|
Daily gain |
0.749 |
0.805 |
0.765 |
0.752 |
0.749 |
0.73/0.03 |
Feed conversion ratio |
2.70 |
2.61 |
2.66 |
2.69 |
2.42 |
0.21/0.16 |
Back fat thickness |
14.37 |
15.96 |
14.53 |
14.41 |
15.93 |
0.77/1.16 |
Table 4: Effect of treated feed on daily feed intake of grower-finisher pigs |
||||||
|
BS |
FLF |
FLF2%Mo |
BSPHY |
BSLAC |
P/SE |
Growing phase, kg DM/day |
||||||
DMI |
56.0 |
54.8 |
55.3 |
57.5 |
54.0 |
0.94/3.05 |
DM |
1.87 |
1.83 |
1.84 |
1.92 |
1.80 |
|
CP |
0.329 |
0.322 |
0.325 |
0.338 |
0.318 |
|
Finishing phase, kg DM/day |
||||||
DMI |
95.6ab |
103a |
102a |
93.8ab |
81.6b |
0.04/4.87 |
DM |
2.39 |
2.57 |
2.55 |
2.34 |
2.04 |
|
CP |
0.368 |
0.396 |
0.392 |
0.361 |
0.314 |
|
Overall, kg DM/day |
||||||
DMI |
152 |
158 |
157 |
151 |
136 |
0.21/6.98 |
DM |
2.17 |
2.25 |
2.25 |
2.16 |
1.94 |
|
CP |
0.349 |
0.359 |
0.359 |
0.349 |
0.316 |
|
a,b Data in a row with a different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05). |
Table 5: Effect of treated feed on nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention |
|||||||
|
BS |
FLF |
FLF2%Mo |
BSPHY |
BSLAC |
P |
SEM |
Digestibility, % |
|||||||
Dry matter (DMD) |
84.7 |
90.0 |
86.3 |
87.5 |
88.0 |
0.16 |
1.43 |
Crude protein (CPD) |
84.5 |
90.6 |
86.8 |
85.0 |
88.3 |
0.29 |
2.15 |
Ether extract (EED) |
77.4 |
88.0 |
80.6 |
81.9 |
85.0 |
0.21 |
3,17 |
NDF |
35.7 |
54.3 |
43.5 |
46.5 |
47.0 |
0.30 |
5.82 |
Nitrogen retention,% |
49.9 |
63.4 |
58.1 |
56.1 |
61.4 |
0.27 |
4.43 |
PUN, mmol/litre |
5.92 |
5.15 |
4.95 |
5.08 |
5.45 |
0.78 |
0.59 |
The effect of fermented feed on phosphorus excretion is shown in Table 6. The data indicate that the diets FLF, BSPHY and BSLAC decreased P excretion in faeces (P=0.06) and total P excretion/P intake was significantly lower than for the BS diet (P<0.01). The utilization of organic phosphorus/P intake was increased in the treated feeds (P=0.05). This criterion is very important for evaluating the potential of fermented feed in reducing of P excretion to the environment.
Fredlund et al 1997; Skoglund et al 1997; Larsen et al 1999 and Lyberg et al 2006, reported that fermented feed can improve intrinsic phytase activity, and thus reduce P excretion. Lui et al (1997) also found that fermented feed increased phytase efficacy with increasing P absorbed. Fermented feed and diets supplemented with phytase and Lactobacillus increased the efficacy of using P. The positive effect of soaking feed on P utilisation was reported by Carlson and Poulsen (2003) and Lyberg et al (2005).
With the exception of FLF2%Mo the aim of using molasses in this diet was to get rapid fermentation, but a quick fermentation resulted in highly acidic conditions and according to Carlson and Poulsen (2003) intrinsic phytase was reduced over time with pH below 5. This could explain the higher P excretion in FLF2%Mo as compared to the other diets.
Table 6: Effect of treated feeds on phosphorus excretion |
|||||||
|
BS |
FLF |
FLF2%Mo |
BSPHY |
BSLAC |
P |
SEM |
P intake, g |
17.4 |
17.0 |
16.5 |
17.2 |
17.1 |
0.99 |
1.54 |
P excretion, g |
11.7 |
7.72 |
11.7 |
8.92 |
9.49 |
0.10 |
1.17 |
Inorganic P |
2.41 |
1.78 |
2.61 |
1.79 |
1.93 |
0.42 |
0.38 |
Organic P |
9.26 |
5.94 |
9.12 |
7.13 |
7.56 |
0.17 |
1.28 |
Total P excretion/ P intake, % |
79.1a |
60.5b |
83.9a |
58.1b |
59.8b |
<0.01 |
4.72 |
Organic P excretion / P intake, % |
53.3a |
34.9b |
55.3a |
41.4b |
44.2b |
0.05 |
6.92 |
a,b Data in a row with a different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05). |
The effect of fermented feed on Enterobacteria counts and Salmonella excretion is shown in Table 7. Enterobacteria counts were reduced in the treated feeds (P<0.01), particularly in the two fermented diets FLF (2.31 cfu/g x106) and FLF2%Mo (2.10 cfu/g x 106) compared with BS (13.06 cfu/g x 106), with the exception of BSLAC. This result was silmiar to the report of Pollmann et al (1980), who found that supplementation of Lactobacillus to pig diets did not suppress E. coli.
A reduction of Enterobacteria counts in the faeces of pigs fed fermented liquid feed has been shown by van Winsen et al (2001), who found that there is a positive correlation between pH and Enterobacteria counts. Nout et al (1989) stated that Coliforms and Salmonella were inhibited in the low pH conditions of fermented feed (below 4.5) compared with dry feed (Russell et al 1996; Jensen and Mikkelsen 1998).
Salmonella was totally absent in the faeces, although there were not enough data to say that fermented feed influences this bacteria, as normally Salmonella is not detected in the feed, and therefore were not isolated in the faeces in this study. van der Wolf et al 2001 reported that fermented feed reduces Salmonella in pigs, and Dahl (1997, cited by Scholten,1999) demonstrated that Salmonella numbers are lower in pigs fed FLF.
Table 7: Effect of treated feeds on Enterobacteria counts and Salmonella excretion in faeces |
|||||||
|
BS |
FLF |
FLF2%Mo |
BSPHY |
BSLAC |
P |
SEM |
Enterobacteria counts, cfu/g x 106 |
13.06a |
2.31c |
2.10c |
5.17b |
11.88a |
<0.01 |
0.88 |
Salmonella |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Fermented liquid feed and the diets supplemented with Lactobacillus and phytase tended to improve gain and feed efficiency of pigs, and reduced Enterobacteria and phosphorus excretion into the environment.
These improvements may be due to a low pH condition, which inhibits the growth of Enterobacteria and stimulates phytase activity, thus improving phosphorus absorption.
AOAC 1984 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
Carlson D and Poulsen HD 2003. Phytate degradation in soaked and fermented liquid feed--effect of diet, time of soaking, heat treatment, phytase activity, pH and temperature. Animal Feed Science and Technology 103, 141-154.
Carlson D and Poulsen HD 2003. Phytate degradation in soaked and fermented liquid feed--effect of diet, time of soaking, heat treatment, phytase activity, pH and temperature. Animal Feed Science and Technology 103, 141-154.
Chai W and Udén P 1998 An alternative oven method combined with different detergent strengths in the analysis of neutral detergent fibre. Animal Feed Science and Technology 74: 281-288.
Cromwell GL, Stahly TS, Coffey RD, Monegue HJ, Randolph JH 1993. Efficacy of phytase in improving the bioavailability of phosphorus in soybean meal and corn-soybean meal diets for pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71,1831-1840.
Dahl J 1997. Feed-related risk factors for sub-clinical salmonella infections. Veterinńrinformation, December1997, pp. 17±20 (in Danish).
Fredlund K, Asp NG, Larsson M, Marklinder I and Sandberg AS 1997. Phytate Reduction in Whole Grains of Wheat, Rye, Barley and Oats after Hydrothermal Treatment. Journal of Cereal Science 25, 83-91.
Hale OM and Newton G L 1979. Effects Of A Nonviable Lactobacillus Species Fermentation Product On Performance Of Pigs. Journal of Animal Science, (48) 4, 770-775.
Jensen BB, Mikkelsen LL 1998. Feeding liquid diets to pigs. In: Garnsworthy P.C., Wiseman, J. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottingham University Press, Loughborough, UK, pp. 107±126.
Larsen T, Skoglund E, Sandberg AS and Engberg RM 1999. Soaking and pelleting of pig diets alters the apparent absorption and retention of minerals. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 477-483.
Liu J, Bollinger DW, Ledoux DR, Ellersieck MR and Veum TL. 1997. Soaking Increases the Efficacy of Supplemental Microbial Phytase in a Low-Phosphorus Corn-Soybean Meal Diet for Growing Pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75:1292–1298.
Lyberg K 2006. Phosphorus in Pig Diets. Effect of Liquid Feeding, Phosphorus Levels and Phytase Supplementation on Digestibility and Performance. Doctoral thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Lyberg K, Simonsson A and Lindberg JE 2005. Influence of phosphorus level and soaking of food on phosphorus availability and performance in growing-finishing pigs. Animal Science 81: 375-381.
Mikkelsen LL, and Jensen BB 1997. Effect of fermented liquid feed (FLF) on growth performance and microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract of weaned piglets. Pages 639–642 in Digestive Physiology in Pigs. J. P. Laplace, C. Fevriér, and A. Barbeau, ed. EAAP Pub. No. 88, INRA, Paris, France.
Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung, Luu Huu Manh and Brian Ogle 2005 Effects of fermented liquid feeds on the performance, digestibility, nitrogen retention and plasma urea nitrogen (PUN) of growing-finishing pigs. Workshop-seminar "Making better use of local feed resources" (Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle) MEKARN-CTU, Cantho, 23-25 May, 2005. Article #29. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/xdun.htm
Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung, Pham Quang Minh, Luu Huu Manh and Brian Ogle 2007 Effects of fermented liquid feeds on the performance, digestibility, nitrogen retention and plasma urea nitrogen (PUN) of growing-finishing pigs. Workshop-seminar “Matching Livestock Systems with Available Resources” Regional Conference organized and sponsored” (Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle) Sida/SAREC, Ha Long Bay, 25-28 November 2007.
NRC 2000 Requirement of Swine. 10th revised edition.
Park JS, Carter SD, Rincker MJ, Fent RW and Gilliland SE 2001. Effects of Lactobacillus Acidophilus L23 Supplementation on Growth Performance of Weanling Pigs Fed Low-Lactose Diets. Animal Science Research Reports . Animal Science.
Pollmann DS, Danielson DM and Peo E R, Jr. 1980. Effect of Lactobacillus Acidophilus on Starter Pigs Fed a Diet Supplemented with Lactose. Journal of Animal Science. 1980. 51:638-644.
Rene Van winsen, Urlings BAP, Lipman LJ A, Snijders JMA, Keuzenkamp D, Russell PJ, Geary TA, Brooks BH, and Campbell A 1996. Performance, water use and effluent output of weaner pigs fed ad libitum with either dry pellets or liquid feed and the role of microbial activity in the liquid feed. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 72:8–16.
Russell PJ, Geary TM, Brooks PH, Campbell A 1996. Performance, water use and effluent output of weaner pigs fed ad libitum with either dry pellets or liquid feed and the role of microbial activity in the liquid feed. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 72, 8±16.
Ryan B Joiner BN and Ryan Jr TA 2000 Minitab statistics software release 13. Dubury Press.
Siener H, Heynck H, and Hesse A. 2001. Calcium-binding capacities of different brans under simulated gastrointestinal pH conditions. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 49:4397–4401.
Skoglund E, Larsen T and Sandberg AS 1997. Comparison between steeping and pelleting a mixed diet at different calcium levels on phytate degradation in pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 471-477.
Tran Thi Thu Hong and Jan Erik Lindberg. 2007. Effect of cooking and fermentation of a pig diet on gut environment and digestibility in growing pigs. Livestock Science, 109 (1-3), 135-137.
van der Wolf PJ, Wolbers WB, Elbers ARW, van der Heijden HMJF, Koppen CJMC, Hunneman WA, van Schie, FW and Tielen MJM. 2001. Herd level husbandry factors associated with the serological Salmonella prevalance in finishing pig herds in The Netherlands. Veterinary Microbiology. 78:205–219.[Medline].
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3583-3597.
van Winsen RL, Urlings BAP, Lipman LJA, Snijders Jos MA, Keuzenkamp David J, Verheijden HM, and van Knapen F. 2001 Effect of Fermented Feed on the Microbial Population of the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Pigs. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 67(7): 3071–3076.