Back to Content

MEKARN Regional Conference 2007: Matching Livestock Systems with Available Resources

Citation

Effect of different nitrogen sou

Effect of different nitrogen sources (raw manure, bio-digester effluent, and urea) on biomass yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.), and of feeding the leaf meal to pigs

Do Viet Minh, Le Van Huyen and Ngo Thanh Vinh

NIAH, Hanoi, Vietnam
minhdoviet@yahoo.com

 

Abtract:

Two experiments were carriet out to determine the effect of different nitrogen sources and harvesting time on forage biomass yield and chemical composition of sweet potato (Ipomoea Batatas L.) and investigate the effect of replacing soybean meal with sweet potato meal on feed intake and performance of growing pigs on small holder farms. The first experiment was a split-plot arrangement to evaluate the biomass production of sweet potato, with 3 farms, each with three nitrogen sources (raw manure liquid [RML], biodigester effluent liqud [BEL] and urea liqid [UL]).

 

Vine (stem and leaf) and leaf biomass production at 30 day cutting intervals were 23.6 tonnes and 11.2 tonnes/ha for RML, higher compared to the BEL (20.6 tonnes and 9.9 tonnes) and  UL (19.8 tonnes and 9.1 tonnes). The DM, CP, CF, ADF contents of sweet potato vines (SWPV) were significant higher for the RML treatment compared to the BEL and UL treatments. However, the DM, CP, CF and ADF contents of  sweet potato leaf (SWPL) were not significantly among treatment (P>0.05)

 

The second experiment was with 54 crossed pigs F1 (Large White x Mong Cai) at three farms with 3 dietary treatments (0, 25 and 50% of soybean meal replaced by sweet potato leaf meal [SWLM]) and 3 replicates per treatment (2 pigs/replicate). Feed intakes were highest for the SPLM50  diet, but growth rates and feed conversion were best on the SPLM25 diet.

Key words: Agronomy, conversion, fertilization, leaf-stem ratio, live weight gain, soybean

 

Introduction

Sweet potato is planted widely in the Red River Delta, and the sweet potato vines and leaves are potential feed sources for livestock especially for pigs. Sweet potato leaves (SWPL) can be used for feeding pigs in fresh, dry and ensiled forms. However, the economic efficiency of these different forms has not been researched under farm conditions. SWPL are high in protein content (from 25.5 to 29.8 % in DM). Crude protein of sweet potato stems is lower (range from 11.5 to 13.7% (Le Van An 2004). Vegetables require many nutrient elements for good growth and production, but N, P and K are three elements of most concern. Leafy vegetables are especially heavy users of nitrogen (Luyen and Preston 2004). The practice of the farmers especially in rural areas of Red River Delta with shallow soils is to plant and harvest sweet potato but with little investment in fertilizers, for economic reasons (low prices for sweet potato root and high cost of fertilizer). Normally, the farmers use some of kind of traditional fertilizer: livestock manure, green manure or ash.  It is very important to find out a cheaper way of supplying plant nutrients such as integrating livestock into the system, with utilization of the manure in biodigesters and application of the effluent as fertilizer for crop production such as sweet potato (Rodriguez and Preston 1996). Despite the potential for improved fertilizer capacity of effluent compared with raw manure there are few reports of trials to compare the two sources of plant nutrients. In Vietnam, Le Ha Chau (1998a,b) showed that the effluent from biogas-digesters charged with cattle or pig manure was superior to the fresh manure when applied to plots growing forage cassava and ponds growing duckweed. In both cases biomass yield and protein content were increased by the effluent compared with the fresh manure. The effluent resource from biodigesters is an abundant and cheap fertilizer easily applied by farmers. It can be used to replace the inorganic fertilizers. Biogas-digesters can play a pivotal role in integrated farming systems by reducing health risks, facilitating control of pollution and at the same time adding value to livestock excreta through production of biogas and improved nutrient status of the effluent as fertilizer for ponds and crop land (Preston et al 1996).

Soybean meal (SBM), fishmeal and meat meal are the main protein sources in commercial pig diets in many developed and developing countries. However, an increasing human demand for protein in developing countries and the relatively high cost of imported ingredients has turned attention to the exploitation of non-conventional ingredients and by-products, which these regions have in abundance (D´Mello 1995). In Vietnam, soybean meal and fishmeal are the major protein sources used in commercial feed for pigs. However, they tend to be rather scarce and expensive for small producers in the rural areas of Northern Vietnam. This has stimulated animal nutritionists to search for cheaper locally available feedstuffs and to investigate their composition and nutritive value.

In the present study, there were two experiments: application of three sources of nitrogen (biodigester effluent, raw manure and urea) to sweet potato cultivation; and replacement of soybean meal with sweet potato leaf meal in the diets of growing pigs.

 

Materials and methods

Sweet potato planting and processing

The treatments applied to sweet potato were:

There were 9 main plots with 27 sub-plots (Table 1). The area of each main plot was 12*30 m (360 m2), and of the sub-plots 4*10m. Total area was 1080 m². The sweet potato was planted with 40 cm between rows and 10- 15cm between stem cuttings. All the nitrogen sources were applied in equal amounts every month at an overall level of 120 kg N/ha. Urea and raw pig manure were diluted with water to have the same solids (DM) content as the biodigester effluent before application to the sweet potato. The biodigester was charged with pig manure.  

  

Table 1. Experimental layout of plots

Farm 1

RML

BEL

UL

BEL

UL

RML

UL

RML

BEL

Farm  2

RML

BEL

UL

BEL

UL

RML

UL

RML

BEL

Farm  3

RML

BEL

UL

BEL

UL

RML

UL

RML

BEL

 

Feeding trial

The study was carried out in Catque commune, Hoai Duc district, Hatay province with 54 F1 growing pigs (Large White x Mong cai) on three farms allocated to 3 dietary treatments with 3 replicates/treatment (2 pigs/replicate). A randomized factorial block design was used with each farm as one block.

Experimental design

The treatments were:

 

·        SPLM0:  Basal diet of maize meal, rice bran, soybean meal, fish meal and vitamin and mineral premix

·        SPLM 25: Same as SPLM0 but with 25% of the soybean meal replaced by sweet potato leaf meal supplemented with synthetic lysine and methionine

·        SPLM 50: Same as SPLM25 but with 50 % of soybean meal by with sweet potato leaf meal

Measurements

Pigs were weighed every month.  Feed intakes were calculated daily.

Chemical analysis

All analyses were performed in accordance with the methods of AOAC (1990).

Economic analysis 

Economic analyses were carried out using current prices in Vietnamese Dong (VND) to comparefeed costs per kg live weight gain.

Statistical analysis

 

The data from the agronomy and feeding trials were subjected to ANOVA using the General Linear Model (GLM) option in the MINITAB (Release 13.31) software for Windows (Minitab 2000) with the statistical model below. Pair-wise comparisons of treatment means were made using the Tukey test.

 

Yij      = m + ai  + βj + (aβ)ij + eij

m      seq level0 \h \r0 seq level1 \h \r0 seq level2 \h \r0 seq level3 \h \r0 seq level4 \h \r0 seq level5 \h \r0 seq level6 \h \r0 seq level7 \h \r0 =  the general mean

ai     =  the effect of ith dietary treatment

Βj     = the effect of jth farms

(aβ)ij =  the interaction between dietary treatment and farms

eij     =  the eth error term

 

Results and discussion

           

Effect of different nitrogen sources on biomas yield, leaf:stem ratios and chemical composition of sweet potato

 

Application of nitrogen from raw pig manure supported higher forage biomass production compared to biodigester effluent and urea (Table 2; Figure 1).

 

Table 2. Least square means for biomass yield and leaf percent of vines in sweet potato fertilized with difference N sources

 

RML

BEL

UL

SEM

 

Fresh biomass, kg/ha

 

 

Vines

23257a

20656b

19842b

506

0.001

Leaves

11136a

9938b

9106c

258

0.001

Leaf, % of vine

48.2

48.4

46.7

0.95

0.38

abc Means in the same row without a common superscript are different at P<0.05

 

 

Figure 1. Fresh biomass yield of sweet potato vines according to source of fertilizer N

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited to here

The results in table 3 show that the DM, CP and CF  contents of sweet potato vines were  significantly higher for RML treatment compared to the BEL and UL treatments, however, the DM, CP, CF, ADF and NDF contents of sweet potato leaf were not significantly among treatment dry season in north Vietnam.    

 

3.2.  Feeding trial

The interaction between dietary treatment and farms on feed intake and performance of growing pigs were non-significantly difference.

seq level0 \h \r0 seq level1 \h \r0 seq level2 \h \r0 seq level3 \h \r0 seq level4 \h \r0 seq level5 \h \r0 seq level6 \h \r0 seq level7 \h \r0 Chemical composition, nutritive value of the dietary ingredients and experimental diets

The chemical composition and nutritive value of the dietary ingredients are given in Table 1. The soybean meal (SBM) used was a local variety with rather low crude protein (CP) (392 g/kg), lysine (20.0 g/kg) and methionine (5.4 g/kg) contents. The sweet potato leaf meal (SPLM) was make by sun-dried and milled to obtain the meals. The CP was 255 g /kg DM, the crude fibre (CF), NDF and ADF contents were 117 g, 269 g and 193 g/kg DM, respectively, the lysine and methionine contents were 3.8 g/kg and 2.9 g/kg DM, respectively for SPLM.

Experimental diets were formulated to contain 0 (control), 120 and 80 g/kg of SPLM (Table 2a, 2b), for first (20 to 50 kg) and second (50 to finish) period of growing pigs with supplementation of 150 g of SPLM and lysine and methionine. The diets used in the study were formulated to contain slightly lower levels of crude protein than the requirements of NRC (1998) which from 20 to 50 kg is 16 % CP and from 50 to 80 kg is 15 % CP. However, the present study was carried out on the crossed breed. The lysine and methionine contents of the basal diet (BSD) and SPLM  diets were from 6.0 to 7.0 g/kg and 2.5 to 3.9 g/kg, respectively. This is agreed with recommendations of McDonald et al., (2001) that 7.5 and 3.9 g/kg, for lysine and methionine, respectively, which are also slightly lower compared to the feeding standards for pigs of NRC (1998). There was no difference among the BSD and SPLM  diets with NRC (1998) standards for the lysine and methionine. The crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents of the SPLM diets were higher compared to the BSD diet. 

 

Feed and nutrient intakes

            Daily DM, CP, ME and nutrient intakes of growing pigs are shown in table 7. The mean DM, CP intake were 2.06, 2.08 and 2.20 kg DM/day for basal diet (BSD), SLPM25 and SPLM50 diet, respectively and significantly higher for the SPLM50 diet compared to the BSD and SPLM25 diet with supplementation of lysine and methionine (P<0.05). Especially, feed and nutrient intakes were significantly higher during first and second month of experimental period (20 to 50 kg of body weight). This indicated that feed intake is not only affected by crude fiber content but also depended on supplementation of lysine and methionine, and soybean meal could not completely replace with SPLM in the diet of growing pigs during first period at body weight of 20 to 50 kg. However, DM, CP, ME and feed intakes at second period of fattening pigs were non-significantly different among treatment. This indicated that dietary fiber is effected lower in adult pigs (second period) than in young pigs (first period), and soybean meal can be replaced with 50 % of  SPLM in the diets of fattening period at body weight of 50 to 80 kg with supplementary lysine and methionine. This is agreed with some previous research that digestibility of dietary fiber is lower in young pigs than in adult pigs and negative effects to energy and nutrient digestibility (Bach Knudsen, 1997; Bach Knudsen and Jørgensen, 2001).

Average daily weight gain (ADG), feed conversion ratios (FCR) and feed costs (FCS) per kg body weight gains (BWG)

Average daily weight gains (ADG), feed conversion ratios (FCR) and feed costs/ kg gain (FCS) are shown in Table 8. The mean ADG was 701 g, 743 and 658 g/day, for the BSD, SPLM25 and SPML50 diets, respectively. The ADG was significantly higher for the SPLM25 diet compared to the BSD and SPLM50 diet (P<0.05). This indicated that soybean meal could not replace completely with SPLM. However, ADG was non-significantly difference between SPLM50 and BSD treatment during second period (fattening pigs), it indicated that soybean meal could be replaced 50 % with sweet potato leaf meal (SPLM) in the diets of adult pigs.  Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was 2.94 kg DM, 2.80 kg DM and 3.34 kg DM/kg BWG, for the BSD, SPLM25 and SPML50 treatments, respectively. The ADG was significantly higher for the SPLM25 treatment compared to the BSD and SPLM50 treatments (P<0.05), however, there was no significant difference between BSD and SPLM50 treatments. It indicated soybean meal could be replaced 50 % with SPLM with supplementation of lysine and methionine. Feed cost per kg gains (FCS) was significantly higher for the BSD and SPLM50 treatments compared to the SPLM25 treatment. However, there was no significantly difference between BSD and SPLM50 treatments. It indicated that  soybean meal can be replaced 50 % with sweet potato leaf meal with supplementary lysine and methionine, and improved economic efficiency of growing pig production under smallholder conditions. 

 

4. Conclusions

It can be concluded that application of nitrogen at 120 kg N/ha from raw manure source lead to higher forage biomass production compared to the bio-digester effluent and urea sources. The DM, CP, CF, ADF and NDF contents of sweet potato leaves were not significantly different while applied diffrence of nitrogen sources from raw manure, biogas-digester and urea liqid, during dry season in north Vietnam. The soybean meal could replace 50 % with sweet potato leaf meal in the diets of growing pigs.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Nitrogen content (%) of RM=1.15 %;  BE=0.4 %, U=46 %.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2.  Effect of different nitrogen sources on biomas yield and ratios of fresh sweet potato vines (SWPV) (stem and leaf) and leaf (SWPL)

 

Treatment

SWPV

SWPL

Ratios L/V (%)

 

Kg/ha

SE

P value

Kg/ha

SE

P value

L/V

SE

P value

RML

23257a

506

0.001

11136a

258

0.001

48.2

0.95

0.38

BEL

20656b

522

0.001

9938b

266

0.001

48.4

0.98

0.38

UL

19842b

506

0.001

9106c

258

0.001

46.7

0.95

0.38

a, b,c Means in the same colum without a common superscript are significantly different.

 

Table 3. Effect of different nitrogen sources on chemical compositions of SWPV and SWPL

 

Items

SWPV

SWPL

 

RML

BEL

UL

RML

BEL

UL

DM (g/kg DM)

 

143a

135b

131b

127

128

120

 - SE mean

0.9

0.9

0.9

2.3

2.3

2.3

- P value

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.07

0.07

0.07

CP (g/kg DM)

174

181

164

288

267

264

 - SE mean

2.9

2.9

2.9

4.7

4.7

4.7

- P value

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

CF (g/kg DM)

179a

168b

166b

144

143

142

 - SE mean

1.67

1.67

1.67

1.2

1.2

1.2

- P value

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.65

0.65

0.65

ADF (g/kg DM)

336

339

326

175

174

176

- SE mean

3.7

3.7

3.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

- P  value

0.06

0.06

0.06

0.94

0.94

0.94

NDF (g/ kg DM)

476

470

468

268

267

260

- SE mean

2.3

2.3

2.3

5.0

5.0

5.0

- P value

0.06

0.06

0.06

0.57

0.57

0.57

 

a, b Means in the same row without a common superscript are significantly different.

 

    Table 4 . Second  experimental design

Parameter

Basal diet (BSD)

SPLM25

SPLM50

No of farm

3

3

3

No of treatment

3

3

3

No of pig/replicate

2

2

2

No of pig/treatment

6

6

6

Total no of pig/treatment

18

18

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Table 5: Chemical composition of the dietary ingredients  (g/ kg, DM basis)

        Parameter            

Maize meal

Rice bran

Soybean meal

Fish meal

Sweet potato leaf meal

DM (g/kg)

863

875

910

890

910

CP (g/kg)

106

113

392

510

255

EE (g/kg)

39

115

141

102

37

NFE (g/kg)

699

469

296

103

396

CF (g/kg)

15

110

37

8.9

117

Ash  (g/kg)

14

83.7

44

244

109

Ca  (g/kg)

0.8

1.7

2.3

50.9

1.4

P (g/kg)

2.4

16.5

6.3

28.8

6.0

NDF (g/kg)

173

257

209

113

269

ADF (g/kg)

31

118

80

91

193

Lysine (g/kg)

2.7

4.6

20.0

24.3

3.8

Methionine (g/kg)

1.7

2.4

5.4

8.4

2.9

ME (MJ / kg) (calculated)

13.8

10.6

14.1

11.8

 

11.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 6a: Ingredient and chemical composition of the experimental diets of first period (20 kg to 50 kg) of growing pigs, with supplementary lysine and methionine (DM basis)

 

Ingredient

Basal diet (BSD)

SPLM25

SPLM50

Maize meal (g / kg)

560

520

510

Rice bran (g / kg)

250

235.5

235.5

Soybean meal  (g / kg)

120

90

60

Fish meal (g / kg)

50

50

50

Sweet potato leaf meal (SPLM)

0

120

80

Lysine  (g / kg)

0

3

3

Methionine (g / kg)

0

1.5

1.5

Vitamin premixa (g / kg)

5

5

5

Mineral premixb (g / kg)

15

15

15

Analyzed nutrients

 

 

 

DM  (g / kg)

856

856

860

CP  (g / kg)

160

163

161

ME (MJ / kg) #

12.7

12.5

12.5

EE (g/kg)

72.5

60.9

61.0

NFE (g/kg)

549

531

533

CF (g / kg)

40.8

46.8

50.3

NDF (g / kg)

194

209

210

ADF (g / kg)

61

89

90

Ash (g / kg)

46.2

62.5

62.9

Ca (g / kg)

9.7

9.6

9.6

P (g / kg)

7.7

7.8

7.8

Lysine (g / kg)

7.3

8.8

7.4

Methionine (g / kg)

3.6

4.1

3.9

Cost/kg (VND) c

3420

3320

3455

Note: a Contains per 1,000 g vitamin premix supplied per kg diet:  1600 IU vitamin A, 300 IU, vitamin D3, 2 mg thiamine, 3 mg riboflavine, 300 mg choline, 15 mg niacin, 5 mg panthotenic acid, 15 mg pyridoxine, 0.5 mg folic acid. b Contains per 1,000 g mineral premix supplied per kg diet: 27 mg FeSO4.7H2O, 10 mg MnSO4.4H2O,, 15 mg CuSO4.5H2O, 85 mg MgSO4.7H2O, 0.3 mg CoSO4.7H2O, 0.1 mg KI, 0.02 mg Na2SeO3. C 1 USD = 16,100 Vietnamese Dong (VND), and # Calculated values

Table 7b: Ingredient and chemical composition of the experimental diets of second period (50 kg to finish) of fattening pigs, with  supplementary lysine and methionine (DM basis)

 

Ingredient

BSD

SPLM25

SPLM50

Maize meal (g / kg)

600

600

600

Rice bran (g / kg)

230

210.5

195.5

Soybean meal  (g / kg)

100

75

50

Fish meal (g / kg)

30

30

30

Sweet potato leaf meal (SPLM)

0

150

150

Lysine  (g / kg)

0

3

3

Methionine (g / kg)

0

1.5

1.5

Vitamin premixa (g / kg)

5

5

5

Mineral premixb (g / kg)

15

15

15

Analyzed nutrients

 

 

 

DM  (g / kg)

854

856

856

CP  (g / kg)

154

153

151

ME (MJ / kg) #

12.6

12.5

12.5

EE (g/kg)

68.7

56

56

NFE (g/kg)

573

576

576

CF (g / kg)

38.4

40.0

44.2

NDF (g / kg)

165

199

200

ADF (g / kg)

60

73

74

Ash (g / kg)

41.8

48.4

48.8

Ca (g / kg)

8.7

8.5

8.6

P (g / kg)

7.3

6.4

6.5

Lysine (g / kg)

6.0

7.0

6.8

Methionine (g / kg)

2.5

3.9

3.7

Cost/kg (VND) c

3332

3390

3270

Note: a Contains per 1,000 g vitamin premix supplied per kg diet:  1600 IU vitamin A, 300 IU, vitamin D3, 2 mg thiamine, 3 mg riboflavine, 300 mg choline, 15 mg niacin, 5 mg panthotenic acid, 15 mg pyridoxine, 0.5 mg folic acid. b Contains per 1,000 g mineral premix supplied per kg diet: 27 mg FeSO4.7H2O, 10 mg MnSO4.4H2O,, 15 mg CuSO4.5H2O, 85 mg MgSO4.7H2O, 0.3 mg CoSO4.7H2O, 0.1 mg KI, 0.02 mg Na2SeO3. C 1 USD = 15,750 Vietnamese Dong (VND), and # Calculated values

 

Table 7: Effect of replacing soybean meal with sweet potato leaf meal and  supplementation of lysine and methionine on nutrient intakes of growing pigs

 

Parameter

BSD

 

SPLM25

SPLM50

SEM

Sig. level

Nutrient intake

(DM basis)

 

 

 

 

 

DM intake (kg/d)

2.06a

2.08a

2.20b

0.04

*

First month

1.56a

1.62ab

1.69b

0.03

*

Second month

2.0a

2.0a

2.2b

0.05

*

Third month

2.63

2.62

2.71

0.08

NS

CP intake (g/d)

311a

317a

335b

11.2

*

First month

249a

259ab

273b

5.2

*

Second month

313a

323a

351b

8.6

**

Third month

371

369

382

11.2

NS

CF intake (g/d)

85a

112b

115b

3.0

**

First month

64a

92b

95b

1.5

**

Second month

80a

115b

119b

2.9

**

Third month

110a

126b

132b

3.7

**

Lysine intake (g/d)

11.9a

14.9b

9.2c

0.3

**

First month

9.8a

12.0b

7.6c

0.2

**

Second month

12.3a

14.9b

9.8c

0.3

**

Third month

13.7a

17.8b

10.2c

0.5

**

Methionine (g / kg)

5.2a

8.0b

5.1a

0.2

**

First month

4.1a

6.3b

4.1a

0.1

**

Second month

5.1a

7.9b

5.2a

0.2

*

Third month

6.3a

9.7b

6.0a

0.3

*

ME intake (MJ/d)

25.9

25.4

26.6

0.70

NS

First month

19.8

19.4

20.3

0.40

NS

Second month

24.8

24.2

26.2

0.65

NS

Third month

33.2

32.5

33.5

1.00

NS

* and  ** Significantly different at P< 0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.

NS is not significant,  P>0.05. SEM is standard error of means.

 a, b,c Means in the same row without a common superscript are significantly different.

 

Table 8: Effect of replacing soybean meal with sweet potato leaf meal with supplementation of lysine and methionine on average daily weight gains (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), feed cost (FCS) of growing pigs.

 

Parameter

BSD

 

SPLM25

SPLM50

SEM

Sig. level

Initial weight (kg)

19.6

19.8

19.4

0.43

NS

Final weight (kg)

82.7a

86.6b

78.7c

0.91

**

ADG (g/d)

701a

743b

658c

8.9

**

ADG1 

520a

554a

458b

13.8

**

ADG2

712ab

757b

659a

16.8

**

ADG3

870a

919 b

858 a

14.2

**

FCR (DM/kg WG)

2.94a

2.80a

3.34b

0.06

**

FCR1

3.03a

2.93 a

3.71 b

0.07

**

FCR2

2.82 a

2.71 a

3.30 b

0.08

**

FCR3

3.03 ab

2.84 b

3.20 a

0.08

*

FCS (VND/kg WG)

11,017a

9,579b

10,999a

247

**

FCS1

10,370a

8,933 b

10,695 a

231

**

FCS2

13,115 a

11,361 b

13,384 a

502

*

FCS3

9,566 a

8,442 ba

8,918 a

240

**

DM intake (kg/d)

2.06a

2.08a

2.20b

0.04

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

* and  ** Significantly different at P< 0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.

NS is not significant,  P>0.05. SEM is standard error of means.

 a, b,c Means in the same row without a common superscript are significantly different.

1 USD = 16,100 Vietnamese Dong (VND).

 

 

 

 

 

5. References

 

An, B.X. and Preston T R., 1997.  Gas production from pig manure fed at different loading rates to polyethylene tubular biogas-digesters. . Livestock Research for Rural Development (11) 2: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd11/1/an111.htm

An, L.V., 2004. Sweet potato leaves for growing pigs, PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2004.

AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, (15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC) .

Bach Knudsen, K.E. 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 319-338.

Bach Knudsen, K.E., Johansen, H.N., Glitsø, V. 1997. Methods for analysis of dietary fibre advantages and limitations. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 6, 185-206.

Bach Knudsen, K.E., Jørgensen, H. 2001. Intestinal degradation of dietary carbohydrates –from birth to maturity. In: Lindberg, J.E. and Ogle, B. (Eds). Digestive Physiology of Pigs – Proceedings of the 8th Symposium. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. p. 109-120.

Chau, L.H., 1998 Bio-digester effluent versus manure from pigs or cattle as fertilizer production of cassava foliage (Manihot esculenta).  Livestock Research for Rural Development, Volume 10, Number 3 http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd10/3/chau1.htm

D, Mello, J.P.F., 1995. Leguminous leaf meals in non-ruminant nutrition. In Tropical Legumes in: Animal Nutrition. D, Mello, J.P.F and P. Devendra (Ed.).  Biddles, Guildford, London, pp.247-281.

Dominguez P L and Ly J., 1997. An approach to the nutritional value for pigs of sweet potato vines (Ipomoea batatas (l.) lam). Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 9 Number 2 http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd9/2/ly92.htm

Dominguez P L.,  1992. Feeding of sweet potato in monogastrics. In: Roots, tubers, plantains and bananas in animal feeding (Editors: David Machin and Solveig Nyvold). Animal Production and Health paper No 95, FAO: Rome, 1992. pp. 217-233. http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/AHPP95/95-217.pdf

Dominguez P L., 1990. Ipomoea batatas. Sweet potato. Animal Feed Resources Information System. http://www.fao.org/ag/AGA/AGAP/FRG/afris/Data/542.HTM

Farrell, D.J., Jibrila, H., Perez-Maldonadob, R.A. and Mannionb, P.F., 2000. A note on a comparison of the feeding values of sweet potato vines and Lucerne meal for broiler chicken. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 85, 145-150.

Garcia C, Gonzalez C, Diaz Ivonne and Vecchionacce H 1999. Features of behavior in pigs fed with root and foliage of Batata (Ipomoea batatas L.). http://bibliovet.veter.ucv.ve/Revistafcv/4003/vo;4003.htm

Giang, H.H., Ly, L.V.  and Ogle, B., 2004.  Evaluation of ensiling methods to preserve sweet potato roots and vines as pig feed. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. #45. Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/7/gian16045htm

Giang, H.H., Ly, L.V.  and Ogle, B., 2004:  Evaluation of ensiling methods to preserve sweet potato roots and vines as pig feed. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. #45. Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/7/gian16045htm

Giang, H.H., Ly, L.V. and  Ogle, B., 2004. Digestibility of dried and ensiled sweet potato roots and vines and their effect on the performance and economic efficiency of F1 crossbred fattening pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. #50. Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/7/gian16050.htm

Giang, H.H., Ly, L.V. and  Ogle, B., 2004: Digestibility of dried and ensiled sweet potato roots and vines and their effect on the performance and economic efficiency of F1 crossbred fattening pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. #50. Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/7/gian16050.htm

Goering H K and Van Soest P J.,  1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications. ARS-USDA Handbook No. 379. Washington DC

Hartemink, A.E., Poloma, S., Maino, M., Powell, K.S., Egenae, J., O’Sullivan, J.N. 2000. Yield decline of sweet potato in the humid lowlands of Papua New Guinea. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment 79, 259-269.

Ishida, H., Suzuno, H., Sugiyama, N., Innami, S., Tadokoro, T., Meakawa, A., 2000. Nutritive value on chemical components of leaves, stalks and stems of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Poir). Food Chemistry. 68: 359-367.

Kean Sophea and Preston T R  2001 Comparison of bio-digester effluent and urea as fertilizer for water spinach vegetable. Livestock Research for Rural Development (13) 6: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/6/Kean136.htm

Kyriazakis I and Emmans G C., 1995. The voluntary feed intake of pigs given feeds based on wheat bran, dried citrus pulp and rass meal, in relation to measurements of food bulk. British Journal of Nutrition 73: 191-207

Lin Y H, HuangT C and Huang C.,  1988.  Quality improvement of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam.) roots as feed by ensiling. The British Journal of Nutrition, volume 60, Issue 1, July 1988. pp 173-184.

Luyen, L.T. and Preston T R., 2004: Effect of level of urea fertilizer on biomass production of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) grown in soil and in water.  Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. #81. Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/10/luye16081.htm

Ly J.,  2002. The effect of methionine on digestion indices and N balance of young Mong Cai pigs fed high levels of ensiled cassava leaves. Livestock Research for Rural Development 14 (6) 2002. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd14/6/ly146.htm

Manfredini M, Badiani A, Nanni N and Chizzolini R 1993 Sweet potato chips in heavy pig production. Livestock Production Science, 35 (1993), pp. 329-340

McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh J F D and Morgan C A (Editors) 2001. Animal Nutrition. Sixth edition. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group Limited, Longman house, Burn Mill, Harlow, Essex CM20, 2JE, England.

Minitab, 2000. Reference Manual, 2000, Release 13.31 for Windows, Minitab Inc, PA, USA

Moat, M. and Dryden, G.M. 1993. Nutritive value of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) as a ruminant feed. Papua New Guinea Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 36, 79-85.

Nehring K. & Haenlein, G.F.W. 1973. Feed evaluation and ration calculation based on net energy. Journal of Animal Science, 36, 949-964

NIAH (National Institute of Animal Husbandry), 2001. Nutrient requirements of Tam Hoang meat type strains. In: Composition and Nutritive Value of Animal Feeds in Vietnam, (Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi)

NRC, 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. 9th revised Ed, (National Academy Press, Washington  DC)

Rodriguez, L. and Preston T R 1996  Use of effluent from low cost plastic biodigester as fertilizer for duckweed ponds. Livestock Research for rural Development. (9) 2:   http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd9/2/lylian92.htm

Ruiz, M. E., Pezo, D., Martinez, L. 1980. The use of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas, L. (Lam.)) in animal feeding. I. Agronomic aspects. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 5 (2), 144-151.

Spackman, D.H., Stein, W.H. & Moore, S. 1958. Automatic recording apparatus for use in chromatography of amino acids. Analytical Chemistry, 30, 1190-1206.

Viet, T.Q., Len, N.T.,  Giang, H.H., 2003. Digestibility and nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of fiber in local (Mong Cai), F1 (Mong Cai x Large White) and exotic (Large White) fattening pigs in Vietnam. NUFU workshop, Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi.

Woolfe, J. A. 1992. Sweet potato: an untapped food resource. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 643 pp.

Zhang, L.Y., Xie, Y.Z. 1990. Preliminary studies on potential uses of protein in sweet potato. Jiangsu-Nongye-Kexue 1, 22-24. ( English abstract).