Back to Content

MEKARN Regional Conference 2007: Matching Livestock Systems with Available Resources

Citation

Use of Giant taro leaves

Use of Giant taro leaves (Alocasia macrorrhiza) for replacement of soybean meal in diets of Mong Cai sows in Central Vietnam

 

Hoang Nghia Duyet, Pham Thi Loan and Truong Thi Thuan

Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry

duyethue2005@yahoo.com

 

 

Abstract

Farmers in the sandy coastal area of Thua Thien Hue often grow taro in their gardens or fields and use the leaves and tubers for the pigs and roots for people. This study was carried out between September 2006 and May 2007 at 104 household farms to evaluate the benefit of growing taro and using the leaves for replacement of a conventional protein source (soybean meal) for Mong Cai (MC) sows. Results show that even on the very poor sandy soils in Vinh Phu commune farmers can get a net benefit of about five million VND per sao (500 m2), which is five times higher compared with rice production.

 

Eighteen Mong Cai sows from third parity were mated by AI with the same semen of a Yorkshire boar and allocated to three diets based on rice bran and cassava root meal: T0: 100% soybean meal as protein supplement, T50:  50% taro leaves and 50% from soybean; T100: 100% taro leaves. Rice bran was 20% of diet and cassava root meal 61, 49 and 38% and taro leaves 0, 22 and 42% of the DM for T0, T50 and T100, respectively. Taro leaves were chopped and boiled for 10 minutes before mixing with other ingredients. Feeding was 1.2 kg DM/day in pregnancy and ad lib in lactation

    

 Litter size at birth was 12.1, 12.7, 13.2 and at weaning 10.7, 11.1, 11.3 for T0, T50 and T100, with no differences among treatments. Piglet weight at weaning decreased with increasing level of taro leaves (7.15, 6.95, 6.48 kg) but did not differ for litter weight (76.2, 77.6 and 73.5 kg). Live weight loss of sows during lactation increased (7.31, 10.95 and 16.0%) and time to re-mating increased (7.2, 8.5 12.7 days) with increasing level of taro leaves. Economic benefit was increased linearly with substitution of soybean by taro leaves.

Keywords: Boiling, cassava root meal, lactation, piglets, reproduction, rice bran

 

Introduction

Taro has been grown for thousands of years in the tropics (Mai Thach Hoang and Nguyen Cong Vinh 1003). The starch grains of the corms are very small, which makes taro highly digestible. The level of crude protein is slightly higher than that in yam, cassava or sweet potato (FAO 1993). The chemical composition of Colocasia esculenta is as follows: Tubers, dry matter (DM) 26.2%, crude protein (CP) 8.7% and leaves DM 8.2%, CP 25%. When cooked taro tuber was used for feeding growing pigs, average gain was 590g/day and feed conversion ratio (FCR) 3.2 kg feed/kg gain (Anon 1985).

 

In the coastal area of Thua Thien Hue Province (Phu vang, Phong dien and Huong Thuy districts), farmers have been growing several species of taro, such as Bac Ha (Alocasia odora), Quang (Xanthosoma violeaceum) and Cham (Colocasia esculenta) in the sandy soil areas. On average households plant taro on about 500 m2 for leaves and roots. Mean yield is about 10 tonnes of root and 20 - 30 tonnes of leaves per hectare per crop (Hoang Van Tha 1003). The chemical composition is as follows: DM 22% and CP 17 - 23% in DM (NIAH 1001). Taro leaves are commonly given to pigs, especially to MC sows.

 

Vietnam has about one million Mong Cai (MC) sows, concentrated in the North and Central part of the country (Hoang Nghia Duyet 1992). Traditionally farmers in Central Vietnam use large amounts of vegetables in the diet of MC sows, such as sweet potato leaves, taro leaves and water spinach, mixed with rice bran, cassava root meal, broken rice, and then cook the mixture before feeding. Taro leaves have high nutrient content (high CP and vitamin content, and well balanced amino acids), but have a high oxalic acid content. Farmers often select the cheapest materials such as rice bran, cassava root meal and sweet potato root meal for feeding pigs, including taro leaves and stems,  that they grow in their garden or in the field. A forage based diet is useful for MC sows, because then the sows do not become so fat during pregnancy, and the milk production is higher. Duncan et al (1960) reported that the effect of vitamin and mineral levels on the reproductive performance of the sows is more important than high protein levels. Mong Cai sows can obtain these nutrients from high levels of forage in the diet. Le Thi Men et al (1999) and Hoang Nghia Duyet et al (2003, 2004) showed that a suitable proportion of forage leaves in the diet of MC sows is 30 - 40 % (in DM) in the pregnancy period and 20 - 30% in the lactation period. However, very little research has been done on the use of taro leaves as replacement for conventional protein sources in diets for MC sows. In view of rapidly increasing price of soybean meal, it is important to find alternative protein sources for MC sows.

 

Hypotheses

   

 

Material and methods

 

Eighteen local third parity Mong Cai sows were randomly allocated to three treatments:

 

The experimental model is shown in Table 1.

 

 

Table 1. Experimental model 

Parameter

T0

T50

T100

Number of sows

6

6

6

Soybean meal in protein supplement (%)

100

50

0

Crude protein in the diet (%)

13

13

13

Amount of feed in pregnancy (kg/day,  DM)

1.2

1.2

1.2

Feed in lactation

Ad-libitum

Ad-libitum

Ad-libitum

 

Growing and processing of the taro leaves:

Taro leaves were purchased from farmers who grow the crop in their fields or gardens. The foliages were harvested by taking leaves and stems from the taro plants, chopping them finely (3 -5 mm in length) and mixing in the planned ratio according to the dietary treatment. The mixture was then boiled for 10 minutes to destroy the calcium oxalate, and allowed to cool before feeding. The diets were offered 2 times per day (at 10.00h and 17.00h) in pregnancy and 3 times per day (at 07.00, 12.00 and 17.00h) in lactation.

Animals:

In total 18 MC sows were selected from farms in Vinh Phu commune (Phu Vang district). All were in their third parity with a live weight of about 80 kg. They were allocated at random to the three diets. All were mated by AI with semen from the same Yorkshire boar. The sows were kept in individual concrete floored pens and were fed the experimental diets from three weeks after mating.

 

The amount of feed (DM basis) was the same in all treatments. During pregnancy, the sows were given  1.2 kg of feed (in DM) per day. In lactation the sows were fed with increasing amounts after farrowing and after 5 days were fed ad-libitum. The crude protein level was 13% in DM both in pregnancy and lactation. The ingredient and chemical composition of the feedstuffs and experimental diets are shown in Table 2, 3, 4 and 5.

 

Figure 1. Dietary sources of crude protein

 

 

 

Table 2. Chemical composition of diet ingredients (g / kg DM)

Ingredients

DM (g)

CP (g)

EE (g)

Ash (g)

CF (g)

Kcal (ME)

Lys (g)

Price (VND)

Rice bran

887

116

115

7.4

88

2878

5.7

2000

Cassava meal

900

34

28

19.0

35

3484

1.2

1700

Soybean meal

890

460

163

49.1

63.9

3800

15

12000

Taro leaves

165

227

50

45.0

115

3425

1.1

2100

 

 

Table 3.  Ingredient and chemical composition per kg of diet T0

Ingredient

DM (kg)

Fresh (kg)

CP (g)

ME (Kcal)

Lys (g)

CF (g)

Price (VND)

Rice bran

0.20

0.22

23.2

576

1.14

17.6

400

Cassava meal

0.61

0.68

20.7

2125

0.73

21.4

1037

Soybean meal

0.19

0.21

87.4

722

2.85

12.14

2280

Taro leaves

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

1.00

1.12

131.3

3423

4.72

51.1

3717

 

 

Table 4. Ingredient and chemical composition per kg of diet T50

Ingredient

DM (kg)

Fresh (kg)

CP (g)

ME (Kcal)

Lys (g)

CF (g)

Price (VND)

Rice bran

0.20

0.22

23.2

576

1.14

17.6

400

Cassava meal

0.49

0.54

16.7

1707

0.59

17.2

833

Soybean meal

0.09

0.10

41.4

342.0

1.35

5.7

1080

Taro leaves

0.22

1.33

49.8

754

0.24

25.3

462

Total

1.00

2.20

131.1

3378

3.32

65.8

2775

 

Table 5. Ingredient and chemical composition per kg of diet T100

Ingredient

DM (kg)

Fresh (kg)

CP (g)

ME (Kcal)

Lys. (g)

CF (g)

Price (VND)

Rice bran

0.20

0.22

23.2

576

1.14

17.6

400

Cassava meal

0.38

0.42

12.9

1324

0.46

13.3

646

Soybean meal

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Taro leaves

0.42

2.54

95.1

1438

0.46

48.3

882

Total

1.00

3.18

131.3

3338

2.06

79.2

1928

 

Measurements:
For the Taro:

Growing time, time at start and finish of harvesting, yield of stems, leaves and roots and economic benefit of growing taros (income for one Sao = 500 m2)

For the Mong Cai sows:

Litter size at birth and at weaning (piglets/ litter), live weight of the piglets at birth and at weaning (kg/ piglet).

Litter weight of piglets at 21 days of age, FCR and price for producing1 kg of weaned piglets (kg feed / kg weaned piglet and price).

An economic comparison was made between the diets.

 

Results and discussion

Agronomy trial

Table 6 and Figures 1, 2 and 3 show that the main taro species grown in the sandy soil of Vinh Phu commune are Bac Ha (Alocasia odora), Mon Quang (Xanthosoma violeaceum) and Mon Cham (Alocasia esculenta). Although these species are very well adapted and produce very high yields of leaves and roots the average area for growing taros in Vinh Phu is still small.

 

Table 6. Growth parameters and yield of leaves and stems

Item

Unit

Bac Ha (Alocasia odora)

Cham (Alocasia esculenta)

Quang (Xanthosoma violeceum )

 

P

Number of households

 

48

37

19

 

Area

m2

88.3

63.1

81.9

0.05

Start of harvest after planting

days

51.8a

48.2b

55.9c

0.01

Times of re-harvesting

days

5.9

5.8

5.9

0.77

Time of final harvest

days

141

143

145

0.11

Number of leaves+stems/ cut

Stems+leaves

1.58

1.78

1.63

0.15

Leaves+stems/ kg

Stems+leaves

13.0

15.0

15.0

 

Stems+leaves at harvest

kg/ clump

0.34

0.32

0.33

0.27

Root yield/ m2

Kg

0.35a

0.28b

0.37a

0.01

Stem+leaf yield / household

Kg

1577a

1434b

1292c

0.01

Root yield/ household

Kg

178a

103b

172a

0.01

a,b,c Significant differences between treatments at P <0.05

 

 

Figure 1. Average area given to growing of taro in 3 communes

Figure 2. Average yield of leaf per household in 3 communes

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Average yield of roots per household in 3 communes

 

        

Table 7. Yield (kg) and income (VND) from growing taro in Vinh Phu

Item

Unit

Bac Ha

Cham

Quang

P

Yield of stems+leaves

kg/ sao

9991

9916

9260

0.65

Root yield

kg/ sao

1063

859

1113

 

Income (stems and leaves)

Millions / sao

3.00

2.98

2.78

0.15

Income from roots

Millions / sao

3.19 a

2.58 b

3.34 a

0.01

Total income

Millions / sao

6.18a

5.55 b

6.12 a

0.01

1 Sao = 500 m2 ;

a,b,c Significant differences between treatments at P <0.05

 

 

Figure 4. Average yield of stems and leaves per Sao (500m2) in 3 communes

Figure 5. Average yield of roots per Sao (500m2) in 3 communes

 

Table 7 and Figures 4 and 5  show that although only one crop per year of taro is grown in the sandy soils of the commune, very high yields and benefit per unit area are possible: about 10 tonnes of leaves and stems, and 1 tonne of roots per sao. Total income ranged from 5.6 to 6.2 million VND / sao. If compared with rice, growing taro can result in 5 times higher benefit. When comparing communes, Table 7 also shows that the yield of stems and leaves was almost the same (P>0.05), but the yield of roots and total benefit was higher in Bac Ha and Quang, and lower in Cham (P<0.05).

Reproduction in Mong Cai sows

Table 8 and Figures 6, 7, 8 and 9 show that length of pregnancy, litter size at birth and at weaning, and percentage of piglets alive at weaning were very high and between treatment differences were non-significant. Sow live weight at farrowing and at weaning were significantly higher in treatment T0 and were lowest in T100 (P< 0.05), but total litter live weight at weaning was not significantly different between treatments (P>0.05). 

Table 8. Effect of diet on reproductive performance

Treatment

T0

T50

T100

P

Pregnancy (days)

113

114

114

0.56

Litter size at birth

12.2

12.7

13.2

0.33

Litter size at 24 h

11.0

12.0

12.0

0.15

Litter size at weaning

10.7

11.2

11.3

0.17

% alive at weaning

97.2

93.3

94.8

0.48

Birth weight (kg)

0.64a

0.65a

0.62b

0.03

Weaning weight (kg)

7.15a

6.95a

6.48b

0.01

Total weaning weight (kg/ litter)

76.2

77.6

73.5

0.23

a,b,c significant differences between treatments at P <0.05

 

 

 

Figure 6. Litter size of crossbred piglets from Mong Cai sows when soybean meal was replaced by cooked taro leaves

 

Figure 7.  Birth weights of crossbred piglets from Mong Cai sows when soybean meal was replaced by cooked taro leaves

 

 

Figure 8. Weight at weaning of crossbred piglets from Mong Cai sows when soybean meal was replaced by cooked taro leaves

 

Figure 9.  Litter weight at weaning of crossbred piglets from Mong Cai sows when soybean meal was replaced by cooked taro leaves

 

Table 9. Effect of diet on reproductive performance of sows

Treatment

T0

T50

T100

P

Total litter weight at 21 days of age

28.3a

29.8a

27.0b

0.02

Sow live weight after farrowing

98.2a

89.4b

89.4b

0.01

Sow live weight after weaning

91.0a

81.8b

75.0c

0.01

% live weight lost during lactation

7.31a

10.9b

16.0c

0.01

Time to re-mating (days)

7.2a

8.5a

12.7b

0.01

Reproductive cycle (days)

166.7a

167.7a

172.2b

0.01

No. of litters / year

2.20a

2.18a

2.12b

0.01

: a,b,c significant differences between treatments at P <0.05

 

 

 

Figure 10. Weight after farrowing and at  weaning of Mong Cai sows when soybean meal was replaced by cooked taro leaves

 

Figure 11. Loss of live weight in lactation and days to re-mating of Mong Cai sows when soybean meal was replaced by cooked taro leaves

 

Table 9 and Figures 10 and 11 show the total live weight/litter of piglets at 21 days of age, which is an indication of the potential milk production of the sows. The percentage of live weight lost during the lactation period, the time to re-mating of the sows after weaning and the number of litters / sow / year were higher in treatments T0 and T50 than in T100 (P< 0.05), but the differences between T0 and T50 were non-significant (P>0.05).

 

 

Table 10. Feed consumed and economic benefit from using taro leaves as a protein supplement for MC sows

Treatment

T0

T50

T100

P

Amount of feed in pregnancy, kg

136

136

136

0.56

Amount of feed in lactation, kg

107.6a

102.4a

89.6b

0.01

Feed for piglets, kg

12.8

13.3

13.6

0.01

Feed weaning to re-mating, kg

10.5

11.5

11.8

0.08

Total feed / cycle, kg

267a

264a

251b

0.01

Feed to produce 1 kg of piglet LW

3.51

3.40

3.44

0.28

Total feed cost (VND)

1,072,738a

828,583b

593,964c

0.01

Income from sale of piglets

1,295,400

1,318,957

1,249,782

0.23

Benefit (VND/litter)

222,663a

490,334b

655,819c

0.01

a,b,c significant differences between treatments at P <0.05

 

 

Figure 12. Feed to produce 1 kg of weaned piglet

Figure 12. Benefit (‘000 VND/ litter)

Table 10 and Figures 12 and 13 show that the total feed to produce 1 kg live weight of weaned piglets was not significantly different between treatments (P>0.05), but feed cost was much higher in treatment T0 and lowest in treatment T100 (P<0.05), and so net benefit was highest in treatment T100 and lowest in treatment T0 (P<0.05).

 

Conclusions

 

·        Taro leaves can completely replace soybean meal in the protein supplement for MC sows without reducing reproductive performance, except for higher sow live weight loss in lactation and increased weaning to service interval.

·        Economic benefits were highest when taro leaves replaced all the soybean meal in the diet for pregnant and lactating MC sows.

 

Acknowledgements

 

The authors are grateful to the MEKARN project, financed by Sida – SAREC, and assistants Ms. Pham Thi Loan and Ms. Truong Thi Thuan for their technical help. Thanks are also due to the 18 farmers in Vinh Phu commune, Phu Vang Distric, Thua Thien Hue province, who shared their experiences and participated actively in this study.

 

References

FAO 1993 Tropical Feeds. B. Gohl. Computerized version 4.0 edited by A. Speedy, Rome, Italy.

FAO 1997 Feeding pigs in the tropics. Rena Perez. Ministry of Sugar, Havana, Cuba.

Hoang Nghia Duyet 2003 The effect of sweet potato stem levels in the diet on the productivity of Mong Cai sows. Science and Technology Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, N0 6- 2003.

Hoang Nghia Duyet, Nguyen Dinh Son, Nguyen Van An and Truong Thi Thuan 2003  Effect of high dietary levels of sweet potato leaves on the reproductive performance of pure and crossbred Mong Cai sows; In: Proceedings of Final National Seminar-Workshop on Sustainable Livestock Production on Local Feed Resources (Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle). HUAF-SAREC, Hue City, 25 – 28 March, 2003. Retrieved , from http://www.mekarn.org/sarec03/duyethue2.htm

 

Hoang Van Tha 2003  Survey of Taro in Huong Tra district of Thua Thien Hue province. BSc Thesis, Page 27.

 

Le Thi Men, Brian Ogle and Vo Van Son 1999 Evaluation of water spinach as a protein source for Ba Xuyen and Large White sows. MSc thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

 

Mai Thach Hoang and Nguyen Cong Vinh 2003  Breeding and intensive root trees production. Agricultural Publishing House, Page 29 - 38.

 

NIAH (National Institute of Animal Husbandry) 2001  Composition and nutritive value of feeds in Vietnam.

 

Go to top