MEKARN Regional Conference 2007: Matching Livestock Systems with Available Resources |
The effect of sulfur (S) supplementation on utilization of fresh cassava foliage and cassava hay was evaluated using sixteen multiparous Holstein-Friesian crossbred dairy cows in mid-lactatation. The experimental design was a 2x2 factorial arrangement using two roughages (FCF: rice straw + fresh cassava foliage, CH: rice straw + cassava hay, CH) and two elemental sulfur levels (0.15 and 0.4% S of DM). The four dietary treatments were offered in the form of a totally mixed ration with concentrate to roughage (chopped rice straw + chopped cassava foliage) at 60:40 ratio and offered ad libitum.
Fresh cassava foliage or cassava hay did not affect DM intake, rumen ecology parameters, total tract digestibility, blood metabolites and hormones. However, HCN intake and blood thiocyanate concentration were significantly higher in cows fed with fresh cassava foliage, although with no sign of toxicity. DM intake, average daily live weight gain, molar percentage of propionate in the rumen, rumen bacteria and fungal zoospores were increased in cows fed the higher level of sulfur. The higher S level also appeared to facilitate cassava cyanide detoxification especially when the cassava foliage was given in the fresh state.
It is concluded that supplementation with 0.4% sulfur will be nutritionally beneficial when cassava foliage is used as a portion of the roughage component in diets for milking cows.
Feeding of dairy cattle in the tropics is often difficult because of deficiencies in feed supply, in both quality and quantity (Wanapat and Devendra 1992). The use of rice straw as a feed in the dry season, in spite of its low nutritive value, has been a common feeding system, generally practiced by dairy farmers in the tropics when green forages are often scarce (Leng and Preston 1983; Wanapat 1994). Chemical treatment of rice straw to improve its quality has been reported (Wanapat et al 1990, 1996). The development and utilization of cassava hay (cassava whole crop at a young growth stage, 3-4 months and being harvested about 30-45 cm above ground, sun-dried for 1-2 days until having a final dry matter of at least 85%, Wanapat 1999; 2003) as an on-farm feed has been recommended as a possible solution to the lack of good-quality roughages during the dry season in the tropics (Wanapat et al 1997). Cassava hay has high protein content, (20 to 27% in DM) and condensed tannins (1.5 to 4%. The use of cassava hay at 0.56 to 1.70 kg/head/day or about 0.1 to 0.5 % BW has proved to be an excellent ruminant protein feed (Wanapat 1999; 2003). The use of cassava hay has been successfully implemented in several ways by either direct feeding or as a protein source in the concentrate mixtures (Wanapat et al 2000a,b,c; Hong et al 2003; Kiyothong and Wanapat 2004; Wanapat et al 2007), as a combination in a pellet of cassava hay, soybean meal and urea (Wanapat et al 2006) or inclusion in a high quality feed block (Wanapat et al 1999; Wanapat and Khampa 2006).
Fresh cassava foliage supported high growth rates (>800 g/day) when fed to fattening cattle as the sole source of roughage and protein in a liquid-based diet of molasses/urea (Ffoulkes and Preston 1978). However, there is a lack of information of feeding fresh cassava foliage as a supplement for dairy cows. During the rainy season, it is difficult to make cassava hay, therefore feeding fresh cassava foliage to ruminants could be a possible alternative method. However, cassava foliage especially fresh cassava contains cyanogenic glucosides, linamarin and lotaustralin. After tissue damage, these are hydrolyzed by the endogenous enzyme linamarase to cyanohydrins. Further hydrolysis to HCN may result in chronic toxicity. In ruminants, HCN can be rapidly detoxified by rhodanese and b-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (Martensson and Sorbo 1978; Frankenberg 1980) by rumen microbes (Majak and Cheng 1984) and animal tissue (rumen wall, liver, kidney and red blood cell) (Aminlari and Gilapour 1991; Aminlari et al 1989). Rhodanase is a sulfur transferase that catalyses the formation of thiocyanate from cyanide and thiosulphate or other suitable sulfur donor, then the less toxic thiocyanate is excreted in the urine.
The main sources of sulfur for HCN detoxification are the sulfur amino acids, cysteine and methionine or elemental sulfur (Oke 1978). Detoxification of cyanide into -SCN causes an increased demand for sulfur-containing amino acids (Maner and Gomez 1973). NRC (2001) also mention that the sulfur requirement of dairy cattle consuming cyanogenic plants (such as cassava or sorghum) may be increased because of the need for sulfur in the detoxification of cyanogenic glucosides. Hence, the hypothesis behind this study was that feeding fresh cassava foliage or cassava hay (10% in total ration) combined with adequate sulfur could provide good sources of protein for milk production in dairy cattle with no toxic effects from cyanide.
This was to evaluate the effect of sulfur supplementation of fresh cassava foliage and cassava hay in milking dairy cows, on:
rumen pH, ammonia nitrogen, total volatile fatty acids, cyanide concentration and microflora population and microbial protein synthesis
nutrient digestibility
serum concentration of urea nitrogen, thiocyanate, thyriod gland hormones and liver enzymes
milk production and composition.
Sixteen , multiparous Holstein Fresian crossbred dairy cows were used in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) to determine the effects of sulfur on utilization of fresh cassava foliage and cassava hay. The experiment period was 30 days and carried out on the dairy farm of the Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Sakon Nakon Campus. The cows were from 100 to150 days-in- milk with a range of 12-15 kg/day milk yield. The treatments in a 2x2 factorial arrangement were: two levels of sulfur (0.15 and 0.4% in diet DM) and either fresh cassava foliage (FCF) or cassava hay (CH) supplying 10 % of the diet DM. Summary of treatment feeds (total mixed rations, TMR) and animals in the experiment are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Summary of experimental feeds (total mixed rations, TMR) and animals |
||||
|
FCF |
CH |
||
Item |
S0.15 |
S0.4 |
S0.15 |
S0.4 |
Roughages (% DM in TMR) |
|
|
|
|
Rice straw (R) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Fresh cassava foliage (FCF) |
10 |
10 |
- |
- |
Cassava hay (CH) |
- |
- |
10 |
10 |
Concentrates (% DM in TMR) |
|
|
|
|
0.2 % S |
60 |
- |
60 |
- |
0.6 % S |
- |
60 |
- |
60 |
Roughage: concentrate |
40:60 |
40:60 |
40:60 |
40:60 |
Experimental period (days) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Number of animals |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Lactation |
1-2 |
1-2 |
1-2 |
1-2 |
Range of initial LW (kg) |
450-550 |
450-550 |
450-550 |
450-550 |
Range of initial milk yield |
12-16 |
12-16 |
12-16 |
12-16 |
Range of day-in-milk |
100-150 |
100-150 |
100-150 |
100-150 |
S0.15= TMR
containing sulfur at 0.15% DM |
Whole fresh cassava foliage crop (variety Rayong 72, bitter variety) was harvested from plots on the university farm. Cutting height was 30-45 cm above ground (at the point where the woody stem charges to the green stem) at a young growth stage (3-4 months). Harvesting was once a day in the morning (07:00 am) throughout the experimental period. The foliage was kept in the cooling room (40 C) until the total mixed rations (TMR) were prepared. The cassava hay was made by chopping the fresh foliage which was then sun-dried for 1-2 days until reaching a final DM of at least 85%. Concentrate and roughage (30% chopped rice straw and 10% chopped FCF or CH, DM basis) were provided every day (09:00 am and 15:00 pm) in the form of total mixed ration (TMR) with concentrate to roughage at 60:40 using a mixing machine. Water was added to obtain TMR moisture at 45-50 %.
The TMR diets were formulated for two levels of S and two supplemental roughages (FCF and CH) (Table 3). The cows were housed individually for each treatment and had ad libitum access to the TMR (fresh quantities offered three times a day), fresh water and mineral block. The cows were milked twice daily by milking machine. The cows were adjusted to the diets for the first two weeks, and actual intakes and other measurements were taken subsequently during the experimental period of 30 days of milk collection.
Feed intakes were recorded daily. Samples of feeds (fresh feed offered and feed residues) were randomly collected (250 g) once a day in the morning before new fresh feed was offered and were kept in a refrigerator until analysis. During the last five days of each period, the cows were in metabolism crates. Feces and urine were collected daily before the morning feeding; a 1% sub-sample of urine and a 3% sub-sample of feces were collected, bulked by period and stored at –20°C until later analysis.
Rumen fluid and blood samples were collected at 0 and 4 h-post feeding on the last day of each period. About 100 ml of whole rumen fluids were collected by stomach tube from individual cows and pH of rumen contents was determined immediately using a glass electrode pH meter. Ruminal fluid samples were then filtered through four layers of cheesecloth and were centrifuged (3,000´g, 40 C for 15 min) immediately and supernatant of centrifuged rumen fluid was divided into two parts. The first 50 ml of rumen fluid was kept in a plastic bottle where 5 ml of 1M H2SO4 was added and stored at –20 0C and later used for NH3-N and VFA analysis. The second portion of 1 ml rumen fluid was kept in plastic bottle with 9 ml of 10% formalin solution and stored at 40 C for later measurement of total direct count of bacteria, protozoa and fungal zoospores. Blood samples were taken from a coccygeal vessel into heparinized Vacutainer tubes and centrifuged immediately to separate plasma that was stored at -20°C before analysis. Milk yields of each cow were recorded daily. Milk samples of 60 ml (in ratio of morning milk samples to afternoon milk samples at 60:40) were collected twice daily during milking (05.00 and 17.00 h) on the last five days of each period for later chemical analysis.
Feed (both fresh feed offered and feed residues) and fecal samples were analyzed for DM, ash, CP (AOAC 1990) and NDF and ADF (Goering and Van Soest 1970). Hydrogen cyanide content of feed and cassava foliage was determined by spectrophotometer (SpectroSC, LaboMed, inc. USA.) with the 2, 4-quinolinediol-pyridine reagent (Lambert et al 1975). Feeds (TMR, CH, FCF) were extracted with 0.1 M phosphoric acid and the acid extract (feed material removed by filtration) hydrolyzed in 2 M H2SO4 at 100 0C for 50 minutes (Bradbury et al 1991). To 4.0 ml of the acid solution was added 5 ml of 3.6 M NaOH, after which the solution was filtered. After five minutes 1 ml aliquots were taken for colorimetric determination of cyanide by Modified Konig Reaction (Lambert et al 1975).
Rumen fluid samples were analyzed for NH3-N using the procedure of AOAC (1990). VFA analysis was by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC; Model Water 600; UV detector, Millipore Corp.) according to the method of Samuel et al (1997). Total direct count of bacteria, protozoa and fungal zoospores in rumen fluid were done according to the method of Galyean (1989).
Plasma samples were analyzed for urea-nitrogen (BUN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxin (T4) using automated clinical chemistry analyzers (Vitallab Flexor E). Thiocyanate was determined using the method of Lambert et al (1975). Plasma samples (1 ml) were added to 3 ml 15% w/v trichloroacetic acid, and centrifuged for 15 min at 1,000 g. One ml of supernatant was used for colorimetric procedure with 2, 4-quinolinediol-pyridine as the coupling reagent (Lambert et al 1975).
Milk samples were analyzed for fat, protein, lactose and solids-not-fat using infrared apparatus (Milko-scan 104, Foss Electric, Denmark). A sub-sample of the composite was analyzed for milk urea nitrogen according to the method of Roseler et al. (1993) using a Sigma diagnostics kit #535 reading at 540 nm in a spectrophotometer (Spectonic 20, Milton Roy company, USA) and milk thiocyanate using the method of Lambert et al (1975). One ml of milk sample was added to 3 ml 15% w/v trichloroacetic acid, centrifuged for 15 min at 1,000xg. One ml of supernatant was used for colorimetric procedure with 2, 4-quinolinediol-pyridine as the coupling reagent (Lambert et al 1975).
Data were analyzed using Proc. GLM model in the software
of SAS (1996). Differences among means were tested using Duncan’s New Multiple
Range Test.
All values for chemical composition of cassava hay and fresh cassava foliage (Tables 2 and 3) are in the range of reports in the literature (Wanapat et al., 2000a; Man and Wiktorsson, 2001; Wiktorsson and Man, 2002; Wanapat, 2003; Kiyothong and Wanapat, 2004; Wiktorsson and Khang, 2004; Wanapat et al. 2006).
Table 2. Ingredients and chemical composition of experimental concentrates, fresh cassava foliage (FCF) and cassava hay (CH) |
||||
|
Sulfur
concentration |
|
|
|
Ingredient |
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
|
Cassava root chips |
52.2 |
52.0 |
|
|
Dried tomato pomace |
7.2 |
7.2 |
|
|
Dried brewer’s grain |
23.0 |
23.0 |
|
|
Palm kernel meal |
7.6 |
7.6 |
|
|
Molasses |
5.2 |
5.1 |
|
|
Urea |
3.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
Sulfur |
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
|
Dicalcium phosphatea |
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
|
Salt |
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
|
Mineral mixb |
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
FCF |
CH |
Dry matter (%) |
94.5 |
95.1 |
26.8 |
95.8 |
|
% in DM |
|||
Organic matter |
95.7 |
94.6 |
92.5 |
92.1 |
Crude protein |
19.8 |
19.5 |
21.3 |
20.7 |
Neutral detergent fiber |
25.3 |
25.7 |
48.8 |
50.6 |
Acid detergent fiber |
15.0 |
15.2 |
32.5 |
35.3 |
Ash |
4.4 |
5.3 |
7.5 |
8.2 |
a
1kg contains: Calcium 300 g; Phosphorus 140 g. |
Table 3 Chemical composition of four total mixed rations (TMR) fed to dairy cows |
||||
|
FCF |
CH |
||
|
S0.15 |
S0.4 |
S0.15 |
S0.4 |
DM, % |
50.2 |
50.7 |
56.1 |
57.6 |
As % of DM |
|
|
|
|
OM |
92.8 |
92.1 |
92.8 |
92.1 |
CP |
15.2 |
15.0 |
15.2 |
15.0 |
NDF |
46.9 |
47.1 |
47.1 |
47.3 |
ADF |
28.8 |
28.9 |
29.1 |
29.2 |
Ash |
7.3 |
7.8 |
7.3 |
7.9 |
S |
0.15 |
0.40 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
FCF = fresh cassava foliage, CH: cassava hay, S0.15 = sulfur in ration at 0.15% dry matter, S0.4 = sulfur in ration at 0.4% dry matter |
DM intake tended to be higher (P=0.065) when the sulfur level was increased (Table 4). These results could be due to the significant increase in DM digestibility especially in the fresh cassava foliage treatment when the sulfur level was increased. Hydrocyanic acid (HCN) intakes were higher in cows fed fresh cassava foliage than in those fed cassava hay. However, there were no signs of toxicity.
Table 4 Effect of fresh cassava foliage (FCF), cassava hay (CH) and different concentrations of S in total mixed rations on daily intakes, HCN intake, total-tract digestibility, live weight and weight change of dairy cows |
|||||||||
|
FCF |
CH |
|
Contrast |
|||||
|
0.15 |
0.40 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
SEM |
Cassava |
S |
C*S |
|
Daily intake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM, kg |
11.6 |
12.4 |
11.0 |
11.8 |
0.40 |
Ns |
0.065 |
ns |
|
% LW |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
0.10 |
Ns |
0.057 |
ns |
|
HCN, mg/d |
1180 |
1256 |
99.4 |
107.1 |
41.2 |
*** |
ns |
ns |
|
Apparent total-tract digestibility, % |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
DM |
65.6 |
72.7 |
68.6 |
72.1 |
2.14 |
Ns |
* |
ns |
|
OM |
73.3 |
77.0 |
73.5 |
75.3 |
3.60 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
|
CP |
72.5 |
76.8 |
73.8 |
75.3 |
3.50 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
|
NDF |
59.3 |
71.3 |
64.1 |
65.8 |
3.15 |
Ns |
0.052 |
ns |
|
ADF |
53.2 |
60.2 |
56.3 |
56.4 |
2.09 |
Ns |
0.114 |
0.131 |
|
Live weight, kg |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Initial |
473 |
472 |
473 |
451 |
18.3 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
|
Final |
463 |
474 |
472 |
457 |
16.6 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
|
Daily gain |
-0.48 |
0.10 |
-0.06 |
0.33 |
0.24 |
Ns |
0.058 |
ns |
|
ns: non-significant, *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 |
The tendency for apparent digestibility of ADF to be higher in cows fed the higher S level could be attributed to increased numbers of rumen bacteria and fungal zoospores (Table 5). The tendency for a negative effect of the low S diet on live weight change may be due to reduction in muscular development as a result of depletion of the sulfur-containing amino acids necessary for formation of S-amino acids as well as for cyanide detoxification (Onwuka et al 1992). These authors reported that goats on the low sulfur, cassava-based diet had the greatest weight losses as compared to S supplemented groups. They proposed that a dietary level of 0.5% elemental S ensured adequate cassava cyanide detoxification in sheep and goats. However, if the difference in our experiment was due to the needs of S for cyanide detoxification, there should have been an interaction between LW change and cassava, as the loss of weight should have been much more pronounced with the fresh cassava foliage, which had ten times higher concentration of HCN. In fact, there was no interaction.
There were no effects of the form of cassava foliage, level of S or the interaction of the two, on rumen pH, ammonia nitrogen, and total or individual VFA. Similar findings were reported by de Oliveira et al (1996) that moderately high percentages of sulfur (0.4 to 0.6%) in the diet generally had no effects on these parameters. Qi et al (1993) also indicated that rumen ammonia was not affected by added sulfur. Wora-anu et al (2004) reported that cattle fed cassava hay or fresh cassava foliage showed no differences in terms of effects on rumen pH, VFA and ammonia concentrations.
Table 5. Effect of fresh cassava foliage (FCF), cassava hay (CH) and different concentrations of S in total mixed rations on rumen ecology in dairy cows |
||||||||
|
FCF |
CH |
|
Contrast |
||||
|
0.15 |
0.40 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
SEM |
Cassava |
S |
C*S |
pH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 h, post-feeding |
7.0 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
0.10 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
4 h |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
0.08 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
NH3-N, mg% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 h, post-feeding |
11.8 |
13.8 |
12.4 |
10. 9 |
2.11 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
4 h |
15.3 |
13.9 |
11.2 |
13.7 |
1.97 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
VFA, mmol/liter |
|
|
|
|
|
ns |
ns |
ns |
Total |
106 |
110 |
104 |
108 |
6.57 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Acetate (C2) |
67.5 |
67.5 |
68.6 |
67.2 |
6.82 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Propionate (C3) |
17.2 |
19.5 |
18.0 |
20.2 |
1.16 |
ns |
0.081 |
ns |
Butyrate (C4) |
14.0 |
13.9 |
13.1 |
13.7 |
0.72 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
C2: C3 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
0.26 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
VFA : volatile fatty acid |
There was an indication (P=0.081) that the molar percentage of propionate was increased on the higher level of sulfur. This finding is supported by Thompson et al (1972) and Zinn et al (1997) who reported increased rumen propionate in feedlot cattle when dietary sulfur was increased from 0.12 to 0.37 and 0.15 to 0.25 %, respectively. According to Goodrich et al (1978), low rumen propionate concentrations could occur in ruminants fed with sulfur-deficient diets because little lactate would be converted to propionate via the acrylate pathway. It is hypothesized that in cattle fed with cassava foliage, rumen microbes might need more sulfur for hydrogen cyanide detoxification (Onwuka et al 1992; Promkot et al 2007) leading to sulfur-deficiency in cattle fed a low sulfur diet which in turn might result in low rumen propionate concentration.
Rumen bacteria and fungal zoospores were in higher concentrations in the cows fed the higher S levels with a tendency for interaction with the form of the cassava (P=0.16 and P=0.085), indicating the effects were more pronounced on fresh cassava foliage than on cassava hay (Table 6).
Table 6 Effect of fresh cassava foliage (FCF), cassava hay (CH) and different concentrations of S in total mixed rations on rumen microorganisms in dairy cows |
||||||||
|
FCF |
CH |
|
Contrast |
||||
|
0.15 |
0.40 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
SEM |
Cassava |
S |
C*S |
Total direct counts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bacteria (x10-1 cell/ml) |
1.4 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
0.09 |
ns |
* |
0.162 |
Protozoa (x10-6 cell/ml) |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.07 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Fungal zoospores(x106) cell/ml) |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
ns |
** |
0.085 |
ns = non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 |
It was reported by de Paiva (2007) that a dose of 0.31% sulfur could increase the population of rumen microorganisms (including protozoa). Slyter et al (1986) reported that there were reduced numbers of cellulolytic bacteria in sulfur deficient sheep (0.04% S in the diet) in comparison to sulfur-supplemented sheep (0.34% S). Sulfur is one of many important factors for microbial growth (Leng and Preston 1983). Low levels of sulfur supplementation in the diet containing cassava foliage reduced microbial biomass in the rumen (Promkot et al 2007). Rumen fungi concentrations and activity may be increased by supplementation with a variety of sulfur sources according to Morrison et al (1990) and Gutierrez et al (1996). In Australia, sulfur-fertilized grass (Akin et al 1983) and a methionine-supplemented diet (Gordon et al, cited by Akin and Borneman 1990) resulted in increased fungal populations. In research conducted by Orpin and Greenwood (1986) it was reported that N. patriciarum required a reduced form of sulfur.
Thyroid hormones and liver enzymes were in normal physiological ranges (Table 7 which indicates that feeding fresh cassava foliage or cassava hay at 10% of the diet did not damage the liver and the thyroid gland. Similar findings have been reported by Khang and Wiktorsson (2004) that 11 % of total DMI of fresh cassava foliage did not affect liver enzymes and triiodothyronin and thyroxin concentration of the thyroid gland in local yellow cattle. Soto-Blanco et al (2001) also found that the levels of the thyroid hormones were unaffected when lactating goats were orally dosed with 3 mg/kg/day KCN for 90 days.
Table 7. Effect of fresh cassava foliage (FCF), cassava hay (CH) and different concentrations of S in total mixed rations on serum and milk thiocyanate (SCN), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), milk urea nitrogen (MUN), thyroid hormones and liver enzymes |
||||||||
|
FCF |
CH |
|
Contrast |
||||
|
0.15 |
0.40 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
SEM |
Cassava |
S |
C*S |
Serum SCN, ppm |
18.5 |
21.4 |
15.7 |
17.0 |
0.37 |
** |
** |
* |
Milk SCN, ppm |
15.4 |
16.0 |
14.5 |
14.7 |
0.43 |
* |
ns |
ns |
BUN, mg % |
15.5 |
14.8 |
16.3 |
17.5 |
1.21 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
MUN, mg % |
16.7 |
15.56 |
17.03 |
16.26 |
0.50 |
ns |
0.069 |
ns |
T3, nmol/liter |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
0.21 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
T4, nmol/ml |
7.3 |
6.9 |
7.3 |
4.9 |
1.14 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ALT, units/liter |
58 |
62.3 |
55.3 |
50.7 |
5.09 |
0.150 |
ns |
ns |
AST, units/liter |
24.8 |
27.8 |
27.5 |
25.9 |
3.87 |
ns |
ns |
ns |
T3 = triiodothyronine, T4 = thyroxin, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, ns = non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01. |
The concentrations of SCN in plasma were greater in cows given fresh cassava foliage diets than in cows on the cassava hay diet. This increase in the levels of thiocyanate in plasma in the cows fed fresh cassava foliage follows from the higher levels of HCN in the fresh foliage, which has to be detoxified to thiocyanate (Martensson and Sorbo 1978; Frankenberg 1980). The higher levels of SCN with increased S in the diet indicate that the S supplementation facilitated the detoxification of the HCN. This effect was more marked on the fresh cassava foliage diet, as indicated by the significant interaction. This finding indicates that sulfur supplementation could facilitate HCN detoxification (thiocyanate is a metabolic product of cyanide detoxification) in dairy cows fed with cassava foliage. Similar results were reported by Promkot et al (2007) who found that sulfur can stimulate the rate of HCN detoxification by rumen microbes. Onwuka et al (1992) also observed that levels of S in the diet were correlated with serum SCN when sheep were fed with a cassava-based diet. The fact that SCN differences in blood were not reflected in SCN levels in milk could be due to passage of SCN from the blood stream into milk being apparently slow. Grün et al (1995) reported that in cows with healthy udders the SCN content of blood plasma was higher than in milk (on average twice). Jose (2004) stressed that the mammary gland barrier reduces the SCN passage from maternal serum to milk.
HCN can be rapidly detoxified by rhodanese and b-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (Martensson and Sorbo 1978; Frankenberg 1980) in the rumen (Majak and Cheng 1984; Promkot et al 2007) and in animal tissues (rumen wall, liver, kidney and red blood cells) (Aminlari and Gilapour 1991; Aminlari et al 1989). Rhodanase is a sulfur transferase that catalyses the deformation of cyanide and thiosulphate or other suitable sulfur donor to less toxic thiocyanate which is secreted to the blood steam and then excreted in the milk and urine. The main sources of sulfur for HCN detoxification are the sulfur amino acids, cysteine and methionine or elemental sulfur (Oke 1978). Therefore, adding sulfur in feeds containing HCN is essential for HCN detoxification.
Milk production and composition did not differ among treatments except for protein content, which was higher in the high sulfur treatment (Table 8). Similar results have been reported by Stobbs and Wheeler (1977) that protein content of cow’s milk was increased following S supplementation.
Table 8. Effect of fresh cassava foliage (FCF), cassava hay (CH) and different concentrations of S in total mixed rations on milk yield and composition in dairy cows |
||||||||
|
FCF |
CH |
|
Contrast |
||||
|
0.15 |
0.40 |
0.15 |
0.40 |
SEM |
Cassava |
S |
C*S |
Milk yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kg/d |
12.2 |
12.8 |
12.1 |
12.0 |
0.54 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
3.5% FCM, kg/d |
12.2 |
13.0 |
12.7 |
12.5 |
0.56 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
Milk composition (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fat |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
0.33 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
Protein |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
0.08 |
Ns |
* |
ns |
Lactose |
4.4 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
0.17 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
Solid-not-fat |
8.6 |
8.4 |
8.3 |
8.6 |
0.16 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
Total solids |
12.6 |
12.5 |
12.8 |
12.9 |
0.37 |
Ns |
ns |
ns |
ns = non-significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 |
Aminlari M and Gilanpour H 1991 Comparative studies on the distribution of rhodanese in different tissues of domestic animals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol . 99(3):673-677.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1769215
Aminlari M, Gilanpour H, Taghavianpour H and Veseghi T 1989 Comparative studies on the distribution of rhodanese and beta-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase in different organs of sheep (Ovis aries) and cattle (Bos taurus). Comp. Biochem Physiol. 92(2):259-262.
http://www.fao.org/agris/search/display.do?f=./1992/v1817/GB9109359.xml;GB9109359
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Virginia.
Barton J S, Bull L S and R W Hemken 1971 Effects of various levels of sulfur upon cellulose digestion in purified diets and lignocellulose digestion in corn fodder pellets in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 33:682. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/33/3/682
Bouchard R and Conrad H R 1973 Sulfur requirement of lactating dairy cows. II. Utilization of sulfates, molasses, and lignin-sulfo-nate. J. Dairy Sci. 56:1429–1434.
Bradbury M and McFarlane J 1991 Analysis of cyanide in cassava using acid hydrolysis of cyanogenic glucosides. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 55: 277-290.
Bull L S 1984 Sulfur in ruminant rations. In: Proc. 5th Western Nutr. Conf., Sept. 18 to 18, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. p 33.
Chen X B, Kyle D J and Ørskov E R 1993 Measurement of allantoin in urine and plasma by high performance liquid chromatography with pre-column derivatization.Journal of Chromatography 617, 241-247.
Frankenberg L 1980 Enzyme therapy in cyanide poisoning: Effect of rhodanese and sulfur compounds. Arch. Toxic 45: 3 15-323. http://www.springerlink.com/content/n32548807x826778/
Fron M J, Boling J A, Bush L P and Dawson K A 1990 Sulfur and nitrogen metabolism in the bovine fed different forms of supplemental sulfur. J. Anim. Sci. 68:543-552. diet. J. Anim. Sci. 46:463-477. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/68/2/543
Garrigus U S, Kammlade W G, Boley L E and Hadenbrook H 1953 A study of elemental enterotoxemia in a lamb fattening ration. J Anim. Sci. 12:474.
http://jas.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/474
Goering H K and Van Soest P J 1970 Forage Fiber Analysis. Agriculture Handbook No.379. United State Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Hammond A C 1983 Effect of dietary protein level, ruminal protein solubility and time after feeding on plasma urea nitrogen and the relationship of plasma urea nitrogen to other ruminal and plasma parameters. J. Anim. Sci. 57 (Suppl. 1):435 (Abstr).
Hong N T T, Wanapat M, Wachirapakorn, Pakdee C P and Rowlinson P 2003 Effects of timing of initial cutting and subsequent cutting on yields and chemical compositions of cassava hay and its supplementation on lactating dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:1763-1769.
Ivancic J Jr and Weiss W P 2001 Effect of dietary sulfur and selenium concentrations on selenium balance of lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy sci. 84:225–232.
http://jds.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/1/225
Khang D N and Wiktorsson H 2004 Effects of fresh cassava tops on rumen environment parameters, thyroid gland hormones and liver enzymes of local yellow cattle fed urea-treated fresh rice straw. Trop. Anim. Health and Prod. 36: 751–762. http://www.springerlink.com/content/m77400x026mh4lp2/
Kiyothong K and Wanapat M 2004 Supplementation of cassava hay and stylo 184 hay to replace concentrate for lactating dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17 (5): 670-677.
http://www.cababstractsplus.org/google/abstract.asp?AcNo=20043087268
Kumar R 1992 Anti-nutritional factors, the potential risks of toxicity and methods to alleviate them. In: Legume trees and other fodder tree as protein sources for livestock. A. Speedy and P. Pugliese (Ed.). FAO, Animal Production and Health Paper. 102, 145-160.
Lambert J L, Ramasamy J and Paukstelis J F 1975 Stable reagents for the colorimetric determination of cyanide by modified KOnig reactions. Anal. Chem. 47:916-918.
Leng R A and Preston T R 1983 Nutritional stratergies for the utilization and technologies to the small farmer in Asia. Proceeding of Vth World Conference on Animal Production 1:310-318.
Majak W and Cheng K J 1984 Cyanogenesis in bovine rumen fluid and pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J. Anim. Sci. 59:784–790.
Man N V and Wiktorsson H 2001 Cassava Tops Ensiled With or Without Molasses as Additive Effects on Quality, Feed Intake and Digestibility by Heifers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 624-630.
Martensson J and SorboB 1978 Human β-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase: distribution in cellular compartments of blood and activity in erythrocytes from patients with haernathological disorders. Clin. chem. Acta. 87: 11-15.
Meyrelles L, MacLeod N A and Preston T R 1977b Cassava forage as a protein in sugarcane diets for cattle: effect of different levels without urea on growth and on rumen fermentation. Trop. Anim. Prod. 2: 200-205.
National Research Council 2001 Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th Rev. ed. Natiotal Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Oke O L 1978 Problems in the use of cassava as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3:345-380.
Onwuka C F I, Akinsoyinu A O and Tewe O O 1992 Role of sulphur in cyanide detoxification in ruminants. Small Rum. Res. 8: 277-284.
Promkot C and Wanapat M 2005 Effect of Level of Crude Protein and Use of Cottonseed Meal in Diets Containing Cassava Chips and Rice Straw for Lactating Dairy Cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:502-511.
Qi K, Lu C D and Owens F N 1992 Sulfate supplementation of Alpine goats: Effects on milk yield and composition, metabolites, nutrient digestibilities, and acid-base balance. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3541–3550.
Qi K, Lu C D, and Owens F N 1993 Sulfate supplementation of growing goats: Effects on performance, acid-base balance, and nutrient digestibilities. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1579–1587.
Roseler D K, Ferguson J D, Sniffen C J and Herrema J 1993 Dietary protein degradability effects on plasma and milk urea nitrogen and milk non-protein in Holstein cows. J. Dairy. Sci. 76:525-534.
Samuel M, Sagathewan S, Thomas J, and Mathen G 1997 An HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acids of ruminal fluid. Indain. J. Anim.Sci. 67: 805-807.
SAS Institute Inc 1989 SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Version 6. 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
Satter L D and Slyter L L 1974 Effect on ammonia concentration on ruminal microbial protein production in vivo. Br. J. Nutr. 32:199–208.
Thompson L H, Wise M B, Harvey R W and Barrick E R 1972 Starea, urea and sulfur in beef cattle rations. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 474-480.
Tucker W B, Hogue J F, Waterman D F, Swenson T S, Xin Z, Hemken R W, Jackson J A, Adams G D and Spicer L J 1991 Role of sulfur and chloride in the dietary cation-anion balance equation for lactating dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1205–1213.
Wanapat M 1994 Supplementation of straw-based diets for ruminants in Thailand. In: Proceedings of Sustainable Animal Production and the Environment. The 7th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Bali, Indonesia. pp. 25-38.
Wanapat M 1999 Feeding of ruminants in the tropics based on local feed resources. Khon Kaen Publ. Comp. Ltd., Khon Kaen, Thailand. 236 pp.
Wanapat M 2003 Manipulation of Cassava Cultivation and Utilization to Improve Protein to Energy Biomass for Livestock Feeding in the Tropics. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16: 463-472.
Wanapat M and Devendra C 1992 Feeding and nutrition of dairy cattle and buffaloes in Asia. Sustainable Animal Production. In: Proceedings 6th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 177-194.
Wanapat M, Petlum A and Pimpa O 2000a Supplementation of cassava hay to replace concentrate use in lactating Holstein Friesian crossbreds. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:600-604.
Wanapat M, Promkot C and Wanapat S 2006 Effect of Cassoy-urea Pellet as a Protein Source in Concentrate on Ruminal Fementation and Digestibility in Cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 1004-1009.
Wanapat M, Pimpa O, Petlum A, Wachirapakorn C and Yuangklang C 2000c Participation scheme of smallholder dairy farmers in the NE, Thailand on improving feeding systems. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:830-836.
Wanapat M, Pimpa O, Petlum A and Boontao U 1997 Cassava hay: A new strategic feed for ruminants during the dry season. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 9 (2):
Wanapat M and Khampa S 2006 Effect of Cassava Hay in High-quality Feed Block as Anthelmintics in Steers Grazing on Ruzi Grass. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 695-198.
Wanapat M, Promkot C, Wanapat S and Rowlinson P 2004 Cassava hay as a protein replacement for soybean meal in concentrate supplement for dairy cows. In: New dimentions and challenges for sustainable livestock farming Vol. II Proc. The 11th Animal science Congress. AAAP. University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. PP. 419-422.
Wanapat M, Puramongkon T and Siphuak W 2000b Feeding of cassava hay for lactating dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:478-482.
Wheeler J L, Hedges D A and Till A R 1975 A possible effect of cyanogenic glucoside in sorghum on animal requirements for sulfur. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge, 84: 377-379.
Wiktorsson H, and Nguyen Khang D 2004 Effects of Ensiled Cassava Tops on Rumen Environment Parameters, Thyroid Gland Hormones and Liver Enzymes of Cows Fed Urea-treated Fresh Rice Straw . Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 936-941.
Wiktorsson H, and Man N V 2002 Effect of Molasses on Nutritional Quality of Cassava and Gliricidia Tops Silage. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15: 1294-1299.
Wora-anu S, Wanapat M, Wachirapakorn C and Nontaso N 2004 Effect of different tropical feed resources on rumen ecology of beef cattle. In Proc. The 11th AAAP Congress, Vol. II (Eds. H. K. Wong, J.B. Liang, Z. A. Jelan, Y. W. Ho, Y. M. Goh., Jothi M. Panandam and W.Z. Mohamad ), Kualar Lumpur, Malaysia. pp 348-351.
Zinn R A, Alvarez E, Mendez M, Montano M, Ramirez E and Shen Y 1997 Influence of dietary sulfur level on growth performance and digestive function in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1723–1728.