MEKARN Regional Conference 2007: Matching Livestock Systems with Available Resources |
This experiment focused on the effect of cassava hay (CH) and coconut oil (CO) supplementation on feed intake, digestibility and rumen ecology in swamp buffaloes. The experiment was arranged in a 4*4 Latin square design with 4 treatments and 4 replications. The treatments were: C: control, rice straw ad libitum (no supplementation), CH: rice straw ad libitum plus supplementation of cassava hay at 1 kg/hd/d, CO: rice straw ad libitum plus supplementation of coconut oil at 2 ml/kg of BW. CH+CO: rice straw ad libitum plus cassava hay at 1 kg/hd/d plus coconut oil at 2 ml/kg of BW. Four male of swamp buffaloes of 252±6.13 kg live weight were used.
The results show that supplementation of CH or CH+CO significantly increased (p<0.05) NH3-N and
blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration. The pH, and VFA
concentration was not significantly different among treatments, but
VFAs tended to increase when supplemented with CH or CH+CO.
Supplementation of CO significantly reduced (p<0.05) protozoa
population in the rumen. Total DM intake was highest (p<0.05)
with supplementation with CH (8.4 kg/d) followed by CH+CO (8.2
kg/d) and supplementation of CO or without supplementation (6.8 and
6.2 kg/day, respectively). The digestion coefficients for DM, OM,
CP, NDF and ADF were highest (p<0.05) with supplementation with
CH (58.4, 59.8, 61.0, 53.4 and 60.7%, respectively) as compared
with supplementation with coconut oil and with no supplementation
(p<0.05). The results obtained from this study lead to the
conclusion that supplementation affected rumen ecology, diet
digestibility and feed intake in swamp buffaloes. When supplemented
with CH or CH+CO rumen ecology and digestibility were improved.
Supplementation with only CO significantly decreased roughage
intake due to reduced numbers of protozoa.
In recent years, the human population has increased rapidly, and
the demand for food, in particular livestock products is expected
to increase in all developed and developing countries. Livestock
plays a major role in the livelihoods of small-farmers in Southeast
Asia and contributes to the regional and national economic
development.
The Lao PDR is a predominantly rural society with 85% of the
population depending on agriculture for their livelihoods, and with
most of the rural households producing food mainly for their own
consumption. Agriculture, including livestock, accounts for 52% of
GDP and over 95% of all livestock is owned by smallholders (Stur et al
2002). Livestock provide many benefits, including
draft power to cultivate the land, transport of agricultural
products, and manure for vegetables, fruit and crop production.
Animals act as a safety net for the family when cash is needed,
especially for sending children to high school. In developing
countries, smallholders commonly use crop wastes after harvest to
feed to animals (Chantalakkana 2001).
Most swamp buffaloes are fed on low-quality roughages,
agricultural crop-residues, and industrial by-products, which
basically contain high levels of cellulose, hemi-cellulose and
lignin, as well as low levels of fermentable carbohydrates and
poor-quality protein. However, crop residues are an available feed
resource in local areas from crop cultivation and are a very
important source of roughages for ruminants. Farmers usually give
these feed resources, particularly rice straw, to buffaloes as
their main diet during the dry season in many Asian countries.
These diets result in low performance, productivity and poor health
due to their low quality, because rice straw is low in available
energy, protein and vitamin, has an imbalance of essential
minerals, and contains a large pool of structural carbohydrates
(Wanapat 1999). However, The rumen has been long recognized as an
essential fermentation vat that is capable of producing
end-products, particularly the volatile fatty acids (VFA) and
microbial proteins as major energy and protein sources for the
ruminant host.
It has been suggested that supplementation of good quality
protein can improve roughage intake and digestibility by improving
the rumen ecology. Cassava is one of the most important crops as a
source of protein for animals, and cassava leaf has a high crude
protein concentration of from 16.7 to 39.8%, according to Allen
(1984). Furthermore, cassava hay has been reported to manipulate
the rumen in terms of improving rumen ecology and enhancing by-pass
protein (tannin-protein complex) and hence could improve DM
digestibility of low quality feed (Wanapat 2000). In addition, it
is possible to improve feed intake, digestibility and the feeding
value of rice straw with oil supplementation, particularly coconut
oil, which is a fat, consisting mainly of highly saturated (over
90%), and is rich in lauric acid. Saturated fatty acids are more
digestible in ruminants than in non-ruminants (Palmquist and
Jenkins 1980). The purpose of this experiment was to determine the
effect of cassava hay and coconut oil supplementation on feed
intake and digestibility, and on rumen ecology and fermentation
end-products. Supplementation of coconut oil could increase the
energy concentration of the diet, and reduce the protozoa
population in rumen, and the combined use of cassava hay and
coconut oil could thus be beneficial for small farmers in the
tropical areas.
The experiment was conducted at the Livestock Research Center
(Nam Xuang), National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute,
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane Lao PDR, situated
44 km from Vientiane City. The climate in this area is divided into
two seasons: dry and wet. The wet season is from May to October.
Annual rainfall is on average 1400-1800 mm, and the peak rainfall
occurs in the period July to August. The dry season is from
November to April. Only about 1 to 2% of the annual rainfall occurs
during the dry season. The average minimum and maximum temperatures
are about 15oC and 32oC, respectively. This
experiment was started in June 2006 and finished in December 2006.
Four male buffaloes, approximately 2-2.5 years of age with live
weights of 252±6.13 kg were used. All animals were confined in
separate pens. Fresh water was available all times during the whole
experiment. Cleaning of the pen was done daily. A vaccination
program, de-worming and a vitamin A, D3, E injection
were given before the commencement of the experiment. Each animal
was weighed at the beginning and the end of each period.
The experiment was arranged in a 4*4 Latin square design with 4
treatments and 4 replications. Four male swamp buffaloes were
randomly assigned to treatments. The diets comprised of basal
roughage, rice straw (RS), which was fed ad libitum, and with a
rumen supplement of 200 g/hd/d. Rice straw was collected from local
farms around the Livestock Research Center and transported to a
store. Feed offer and feed refusals were weighed every day to
calculate feed intake during the first 14 d. Cassava hay (CH) was
harvested 3 months after planting by hand, and the green part cut
at a height of 50-70 cm above the ground. The foliage was chopped
into small pieces (2-3 cm) by chopping machine (hand-operated).
After that, it was sun-dried for 2-3 days to reduce moisture
(DM>85%) and hydro-cyanic acid (HCN) content. Cassava hay was
stored and fed to the buffaloes according to the following
treatments in two equal parts in the morning (07:00h) and in the
afternoon (16:30h). Coconut oil was bought from the market. The
treatments were supplementation of cassava hay or coconut oil
according to respective experiments as follows:
C: control, fed rice straw ad libitum (no
supplementation)
CH: fed rice straw ad libitum plus cassava hay supplementation
at 1 kg/hd/d
CO: fed rice straw ad libitum plus coconut oil supplementation
at 2 ml/kg of BW
CH+CO: fed rice straw ad libitum plus cassava hay at 1 kg/hd/d
plus coconut oil at 2 ml/kg of BW
All animals were offered fresh water ad libitum and a rumen
supplement at 200 g/hd/d of concentrate (50 g urea, 10 g suphur, 50
g salt, 50 g bone meal and 40 g molasses). Buffaloes were adapted
to the diets for about 30 days prior to the first period and for
intake measurement and sample collection periods during 14 and 5 d,
respectively for each period.
Buffaloes were weighed at the beginning and at the end of each
period for 2 consecutive days (28 days per period). Feed offer and
refusals were measured daily to determine feed intake. Feed samples
were randomly collected daily, and all samples were combined
together and randomly sampled for dry matter (DM), ash and crude
protein (CP) analysis according to AOAC (1990). The contents of
neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF) and
acid-detergent lignin (ADL) were determined according to the
procedure of Goering and Van Soest (1970).
The fecal samples were collected from rectum
before feeding in the mornings during the last 5 days of each
period. The samples were kept in the refrigerator until analyses
for DM, OM, CP, NDF and ADF, with acid insoluble ash (AIA) used as
an internal indicator to calculate digestibility of feed according
to Galyean (1989).
Blood samples of about 10 ml were taken from
jugular vein into a tube by needle at 0 and 4 hr post-feeding on
the last day of each period. The samples were refrigerated for 1 hr
and then centrifuged at 3500 x g for 20 min. The plasma was removed
and was analyzed for blood-urea nitrogen (BUN) composition
according to the method of Roseler et al
(1993).
Rumen fluid samples (80 ml) were taken at 0
and 4 hr post-feeding on the last day of each period by using a
stomach tube connected with a vacuum pump. Rumen fluid pH was
determined immediately after sampling by pH meter and rumen fluid
was fixed by adding 10% H2SO4 solution (1 ml
H2SO4 to 9 ml of rumen fluid) for later
analysis of NH3-N concentration (AOAC 1990) and VFA
concentration by HPLC (Samuel 1997). Methane (CH4)
production was estimated from the concentrations of C2, C3 and C4
according to the equation of Moss et al (2000). The
subsequent rumen fluid was immediately fixed with 10% formalin
solution (1:9 v/v, rumen fluid: 10% formalin) for measuring the
protozoa population (Galyean 1989).
All data were analyzed of Variance (ANOVA) according to Latin
square design using the General Linear Model (GLM) of Minitab
Software Version Release 14 (2003), treatment means which showed
significant differences with probability level of p<0.05 were
compared using Tukey's pairwise comparison procedures. Statistical
model was as follows: Yijk = µ +Ti +
Cj + Rk +eijk Where =
Yijk = The criteria under study, in treatment were (i);
column (j); row (k). µ = Overall sample mean. Ti =
Effect of treatment (i). Cj = Effect of treatment (i) at
column (j). Rk = Effect of treatment (i) at row (k).
eijk = Error
The chemical composition of the experimental feeds is shown in Table 1. The rice straw contained 92.4% DM. The content of crude protein in rice straw, cassava hay (CH) and rumen supplement was 3.0, 21.3 and 54.6% of DM, respectively, and the level NDF, ADF and ADL in rice straw and CH was 78.2, 51.7, 12.9 and 52.4, 34.0, 10.8% of DM, respectively. Coconut oil (CO) comprises 6% oleic (C18:1); 2% linoleic (C18:2); 6% capric (C10:0); 47% lauric (C12:0); 18% myristic (C14:0); 9% palmistic (C16:0); 3% stearic (C18:0) acid (Scientific Psychic 2005).
Table 1. Feedstuffs used in the experiment and their
chemical composition |
|||
|
Rumen supplement |
Rice straw |
Cassava hay |
Ingredients, % |
|
|
|
Urea |
25.0 |
- |
- |
Suphur |
5.0 |
- |
- |
Salt |
25.0 |
- |
- |
Bone meal |
25.0 |
- |
- |
Molasses |
20.0 |
- |
- |
Chemical composition, % in DM, except for DM which is on fresh basis |
|||
Dry matter |
89.4 |
92.4 |
91.9 |
Ash |
9.3 |
13.5 |
6.7 |
Crude protein |
54.6 |
3.0 |
21.3 |
Neutral-detergent fiber |
- |
72.8 |
52.4 |
Acid-detergent fiber |
1.6 |
51.7 |
34.0 |
Acid-detergent lignin |
- |
12.9 |
10.8 |
Condensed tannins |
- |
- |
3.6 |
Rumen ecology parameters are presented in Table 2. Rumen pH, total VFA and their proportions were not affected by supplementation of CH and CO. Supplementation of CH and CH+CO resulted in significantly higher NH3-N and BUN concentration when compared with the control and CO supplemented groups. Supplementation of CO was significantly reduced (P<0.05) protozoa population (1.2 x105 cells/ml) vs (4.8 x105 cells/ml) when without supplemented oil.
Table 2. Effect of cassava hay, with or without coconut
oil supplementation on rumen ecology in swamp buffaloes
|
||||||
|
Control |
Supplemented groups |
SEM |
|||
CH |
CO |
CH+CO |
||||
pH, |
0 h post-feeding |
7.2 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
0.11 |
|
4 h post-feeding |
7.1 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
0.09 |
NH3-N, mg% |
0 h post-feeding |
5.8a |
13.5b |
6.5a |
11.6b |
0.93 |
|
4 h post-feeding |
6.6a |
17.4b |
6.3a |
15.7b |
1.45 |
TVFA, mM |
|
93.1 |
108.4 |
98.1 |
103.4 |
7.49 |
Acetate |
0 h post-feeding |
65.4 |
67.0 |
62.3 |
66.0 |
5.37 |
|
4 h post-feeding |
57.8 |
65.9 |
57.6 |
59.0 |
4.99 |
Propionate |
0 h post-feeding |
24.3 |
31.2 |
28.4 |
30.6 |
3.06 |
|
4 h post-feeding |
21.3 |
28.7 |
24.9 |
28.0 |
2.35 |
Butyrate |
0 h post-feeding |
10.3 |
12.5 |
12.3 |
13.1 |
1.38 |
|
4 h post-feeding |
8.8 |
11.5 |
8.4 |
10.9 |
0.91 |
BUN, mg% |
0 h post-feeding |
8.6a |
12.3b |
6.9a |
11.5b |
1.55 |
|
4 h post-feeding |
11.7a |
16.9b |
7.6a |
15.0b |
1.06 |
Protozoa, x105 |
0 h post-feeding |
4.9a |
3.7b |
1.2c |
1.2c |
0.11 |
|
4 h post-feeding |
4.6a |
3.3b |
1.1c |
1.1c |
0.10 |
a,b,c Values on the same row with different
superscripts differ (P<0.05) NH3-N = Ammonia nitrogen; TVFA = Total volatile fatty
acid; BUN = Blood-urea nitrogen. SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = No supplementation (fed rice straw ad libitum).
CH = Fed rice straw ad libitum + cassava hay supplementation at
1 kg/hd/d. CO = Fed rice straw ad libitum + coconut oil supplementation at
2 ml/kg of BW. CH+CO = Fed rice straw ad libitum + cassava hay at 1 kg/hd/d +
coconut oil at 2 ml/kg of BW. |
Total dry matter intake was significantly higher (p<0.05) in buffalo supplemented with CH, with or without CO, as compared with control and CO supplemented alone (Table 3). Moreover, rice straw intake was higher (p<0.05) in CH without CO supplementation. Digestibility of nutrients is presented in Table 4, and were significantly different (p<0.05) among supplemented groups. Buffalo supplemented with CH had significantly higher diet digestibility than those supplemented with only CO or control treatment. However, there was no difference in digestion in the CH and CH+CO supplemented groups. Digestibility of CP was significantly higher for the treatment with CH. Buffalo live weight changes (LWC) during the experimental period are shown in Table 3. There was a significant difference in LWC among supplemented groups. Buffaloes on diets CH and CH+CO maintained live weight better than animals on C and CO (188 and 100 vs 53 and 45 g/hd/d, respectively.
Table 3. Effect of cassava hay, with or without coconut oil supplementation, on feed intake and live weight change in swamp buffaloes |
|||||
|
Control |
Supplemented groups |
SEM |
||
|
CH |
CO |
CH+CO |
||
Rice straw DMI |
|
|
|
|
|
kg/hd/d |
6.2a |
7.4b |
6.4a |
6.8c |
0.05 |
% of BW |
2.5a |
2.9b |
2.5a |
2.7c |
0.02 |
Cassava hay DMI |
|
|
|
|
|
kg/hd/d |
- |
1.0 |
- |
1.0 |
0.01 |
% of BW |
- |
0.4 |
- |
0.4 |
0.01 |
Coconut oil intake |
|
|
|
|
|
kg/hd/d |
- |
- |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.04 |
% of BW |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.01 |
Total DMI |
|
|
|
|
|
kg/hd/d |
6.2a |
8.4b |
6.8c |
8.2b |
0.05 |
% of BW |
2.5a |
3.3b |
2.7c |
3.3b |
0.02 |
Live weight change |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial/kg |
253.0 |
251.2 |
254.7 |
252.7 |
0.98 |
Final/kg |
254.5 |
256.5 |
256.0 |
255.5 |
0.98 |
Live weight gain, kg/d |
0.053a |
0.188b |
0.045a |
0.100c |
0.01 |
a,b,c
Values on the same row with different superscripts differ (P<0.05). |
The supplementation of CH, with or without CO significantly
increased digestibility coefficients of all nutrients (DM, OM, CP,
NDF and ADF) leading to significantly higher digestible nutrient
intakes. CO supplementation alone did not additionally improve digestibility and digestible nutrient intake when compared with the
control group.
Table 4. Effect of cassava hay, with or without coconut
oil supplementation, on digestibility and digestible nutrients
intake in swamp buffaloes |
|||||
|
Control |
Supplemented groups |
SEM |
||
|
CH |
CO |
CH+CO |
||
Digestion coefficients, % |
|
|
|
|
|
Dry matter |
47.6a |
58.4b |
51.5a |
54.8ab |
0.92 |
Organic matter |
50.6a |
59.8b |
51.8a |
54.5a |
0.92 |
Crude protein |
55.4a |
61.0b |
52.4a |
62.3b |
0.77 |
Neutral-detergent fiber |
52.3a |
53.4a |
47.7b |
51.6a |
0.85 |
Acid-detergent fiber |
54.8a |
60.7b |
51.9a |
52.7a |
0.80 |
a,b,c Values on the same row with different
superscripts differ (P<0.05). SEM = Standard error of the mean. Control = No supplementation (fed rice straw ad libitum).
CH = Fed rice straw ad libitum + cassava hay supplementation at
1 kg/hd/d. CO = Fed rice straw ad libitum + coconut oil supplementation at
2 ml/kg of BW. CH+CO = Fed rice straw ad libitum + cassava hay at 1 kg/hd/d +
coconut oil at 2 ml/kg of BW. |
The effect of CH and CO supplementation on economical returns is
shown in Table 5. Supplementation of CH with or without CO gave
significantly higher incomes, of 8.0 and 17.2 USD/hd/month, as
compared to the other treatments while supplementation of CO alone
significantly improved in economic returns.
Table 5. Effect of cassava hay, with or without coconut
oil supplementation, on economical returns in swamp
buffaloes |
|||||
|
Control |
Supplemented groups |
SEM |
||
CH |
CO |
CH+CO |
|||
Expenditure, USD/hd/d |
|
|
|
|
|
Rice straw |
0.31a |
0.37b |
0.32a |
0.34c |
0.002 |
Cassava hay |
- |
0.19 |
- |
0.19 |
0.002 |
Coconut oil |
- |
- |
0.53 |
0.52 |
0.006 |
Rumen supplement |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.000 |
Total |
0.61a |
0.86b |
1.15c |
1.35d |
0.010 |
LWG/hd/d |
0.06a |
0.19b |
0.05a |
0.10c |
0.010 |
Income, USD/hd/m |
4.53a |
17.14b |
3.14a |
8.08c |
0.760 |
a,b,c Values on the same row with different
superscripts differ (P<0.05). |
Buffalo generally have the ability to utilize and consume a wide
range of natural grass and crop residues. They are left to graze
freely, with limited available feed resources, especially in the
dry season, or where there is intensive cropping. During this time,
the animals have low performance due to shortage of feeds. Several
improvements can be made to the system, and one common strategy is
to dry cassava foliage to cassava hay, which is mostly used for
ruminants. Whatever, based on this experiment it was found that the
rumen pH was similar among treatments, which is similar to the
findings of Mom Seng et al (2001), Nguyen van Thu (2001),
Promkot and Wanapat (2003) and Yuangklang et al (2001).
Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004) reported that pH was not
significantly different when ruminants were supplemented with
different cassava hay diets. Optimum pH for maximum microbial
growth is between 6.5 and 7.0 (Hungate 1966).
The mean values of ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N)
concentration in the rumen fluid of buffaloes was affected by
supplementation, and were 16.2, 12.6, 6.6 and 7.1 mg%,
respectively, with supplementation with cassava hay, cassava hay
plus coconut oil, coconut oil and without supplementation. The
results were similar to the findings of Wanapat et al
(2005), who found that the ammonia-nitrogen concentration in the
rumen fluid was not significantly affected by increasing level of
oil, but ammonia-nitrogen trended to be increase when supplemented
with a high level of 4% urea. These results are similar to those of
Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004), who showed that ammonia-nitrogen
concentration in the rumen ranged from 12.5 to 14.3 mg% when
supplemented with cassava hay (600 g/hd/d). In addition, rumen
NH3-N was increased from 4.5 to 12.4 mg% in cows fed
with untreated and urea-treated rice straw, respectively (Promkot
and Wanapat 2003), which is imilar to the findings of Chanthai et al (1989) who found that in cattle fed untreated rice
straw NH3-N was less than 2 mg% and increased to 9 mg%
when the straw was treated with urea.
Maximum microbial growth efficiency is highly affected by the
digestion of poor quality forages in ruminants. Bryant (1973)
reported that in principle cellulolytic bacteria species utilize
ammonia as the main source of nitrogen. The most suitable rumen
NH3-N levels for microbial activities were 5-20 mg/100ml
in ruminants fed on low-quality roughages (Boniface et al
1986; Perdok and Leng 1989). Wanapat and Pimpa (1999) found that
optimum range of NH3-N was 13.6-34.4 mg/100 ml for
microbial protein synthesis and digestibility in buffaloes. A
similar result was obtained by Nguyen Van Thu and Preston (1999),
who demonstrated that a concentration of rumen NH3-N of
15-30 mg/100ml was optimum for maximum feed intake and
digestibility. Preston and Leng (1987) also reported that the
optimum level of NH3-N in rumen fluid for microbial
growth ranged from 5 to 25 mg/dl and a range of 8.5 to over 30
mg/dl was considered optimum by McDonald et al (1996).
Supplementation of cassava hay or coconut oil did not
significantly affect total VFA concentration, but they tended to be
higher with supplementation with cassava hay and cassava hay plus
coconut oil as compared to supplementation of coconut oil alone or
no supplement (108.4, 103.4, 98.1 and 93.1 mM, respectively).
Wanapat (2001b) showed that total VFA concentrations at 0 and 4 hr
post-feeding in ruminants fed on rice straw were 85.7 and 80.5 mM,
respectively. Wanapat et al (2005) found that different
supplementation levels of coconut oil significantly affected VFA in
the proportions in the rumen. There was a significantly higher
level of acetate when animals were supplemented with 2% coconut
oil, while propionate and butyrate proportions were increased with
supplementation of 4% coconut oil. Nguyen Van Thu (2005) also
showed that total VFA were significantly lower when buffaloes were
fed rice straw, and were higher when supplemented with sesbania
(Sesbania grandiflora) leaves, and similar results were
found by Nguyen Van Thu (2001). As Leng (1982) pointed out, the
efficiency of microbial growth in the rumen depends on rumen
biochemistry, mainly the factors that are involved in the
production of VFA in fermentative processes. However, total VFA
concentrations in all diets were within the normal range of 70 to
130 mM (France and Siddons 1993)
Blood-urea nitrogen was affected by supplementation of cassava
hay and cassava hay plus coconut oil; it was increased when buffalo
were supplemented with cassava hay and cassava hay plus coconut oil
(14.6 and 13.3 mg%, respectively) as compared to supplemented with
coconut oil and not supplemented (9.4 and 10.9 mg%, respectively).
These results are in agreement with Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004)
who found that with supplementation of cassava hay at 600 g/hd/d,
BUN concentrations at 0 and 4 hr post-feeding were 10.7 and 13.6
mg%, respectively. Earlier work by Wanapat et al (2005)
showed that blood-urea nitrogen was affected by supplementation
with a high level of coconut oil (4%) (20.3 mg%). However, BUN has
been known to be related to inefficient utilization of dietary CP
in ruminants (Lewis 1957).
Coconut oil supplementation reduced the protozoa population in
the rumen. The results obtained from this study agree with various
earlier studies (Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan et al 2001; Mom Seng et al
2001; Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan et al 2005;
Wanapat et al 2005) that found that supplementation of
coconut oil or an oil drench significantly reduced protozoa.
However, the mean number of protozoa in this study, for animals fed
untreated rice straw, was 4.8 x105 cells/ml, while
Nguyen van Thu (2001), Yuangklang et al (2003) and
Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004) reported protozoa numbers of 3.5;
3.9 and 5.3 x105 cells/ml in cattle, respectively. In
contrast, this result was lower than the finding of Nguyen Van Thu
(2005). In the treatment with supplementation with coconut oil the
protozoa population (1.2 x105) was similar to that
reported by Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan et al (2005), who
concluded that drenching with soy bean oil at levels of 6 and 8
ml/kg BW resulted in a major reduction of the population of
protozoa, and in the period 26 to 30 days after giving oil the
numbers of protozoa were 1.2 and 0.8 x105 cells/ml,
respectively. In contrast with the reduction of protozoa, the
numbers of bacteria were increased by oil supplementation (Nguyen
Thi Hong Nhan et al 2005a). As reported, supplementation
of coconut oil could improve rumen fermentation in terms of the
fermentation end-products (Wanapat et al 2005). However,
the rumen microbes of native cattle and swamp buffalo fed typical
local diets were found to be different, in that buffalo exhibited
higher cellulolytic bacteria and fungal zoospores, but had a lower
protozoa population (Wanapat et al 2000a).
Supplementation of cassava hay significantly increased (p<0.05) both DM rice straw and total DM intake. This is similar to the results of Wanapat et al (1989), Wanapat (2001a), Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004) and Tran Quoc Viet and Dao Duc Kien (2005), who found that supplementation of cassava hay increased total rice straw DM intakes, growth rate and digestibility of cattle and buffaloes. In the current study, supplementation of cassava hay increased rice straw intake (6.8 and 7.4 kg/d) with and without supplementation of coconut oil (CH+CO and CO, respectively). The results agree with Yuangklang et al (2003), who reported that DM intakes of buffaloes were higher for cassava hay than rice straw treated groups (10.4 and 6.7, respectively). Supplementation of coconut oil alone significantly decreased feed intake (6.4 kg/d), which is in agreement with Mom Seng et al (2001) and Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan et al (2001; 2005a). On the other hand, cassava hay has been used successfully as a source of high protein roughage in lactating diary cows, and when supplementing cassava hay at 0.5-1.7 kg/hd/d, levels of concentrate could be reduced by 0.1-1.6 kg/hd/d, respectively (Wanapat et al 2000).
A linear increase in DM intake
was found as level of oil drench increased (Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan et al
2005). Similar results were found by Nguyen Xuan
Trach and Mai Thi Thom (2004) who reported that groundnut oil (5
ml/kg live-weight) could improve feed intake, growth rate and profitability. Church
(1976) and Preston and Leng (1987) found that adding high levels of
fat increased microbial activities. Normally, the fat content of
ruminant diets is low (< 50 g/kg), and if it is increased above
100 g/kg the activities of rumen microbes are reduced (McDonald et al
2002). Looper et al (2001) suggested a limit in total fat
of 6-7% of the ration dry matter. The live weight changes of
buffaloes were significantly improved with supplementation.
Supplementation of cassava hay gave the significantly highest gain
(188 g/d), while the treatment with cassava hay plus coconut oil
gave higher gains than supplementation with coconut oil or no
supplementation (100, 45 and 53 g/d, respectively). All the
buffaloes could at least maintain body weight during the course of
the experiment.
Supplementation of cassava hay plus coconut oil or
supplementation of cassava hay alone significantly improved
digestion coefficients of DM, OM, CP, NDF and ADF as compared to
the supplementation of coconut oil or no supplementation. This
finding is in agreement with Wanapat et al (2005), who
illustrated that digestion coefficients of DM, OM and CP were
significantly improved by supplementation with 4% coconut oil plus
2% urea (57.3, 60.7 and 59.1%, respectively). Digestion
coefficients of DM, NDF and ADF were significantly improved when
buffalo were supplemented with sesbania (Sesbania
grandiflora) leaves, but was reduced when they were fed with
rice straw (Nguyen Van Thu 2005). Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004)
found that digestion coefficients of DM, CP, NDF and ADF were
increased with increased level of supplementation of cassava hay.
Apparent digestibility coefficients of DM and OM were significantly
different between rice straw and cassava hay (51.0 and 56.4 and
60.0 and 62.0%, respectively (Yuangklang et al 2003).
Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan et al (2005a) found that when cattle
had been drenched with soybean oil at 8 ml/kg BW, in the periods 20
to 25 days, and 26 to 30 days, after giving the oil the DM
digestibility was 52.6 and 54.6%, respectively. Several reports
have indicated that cassava hay is a good source of rumen by-pass
protein (Ffoulkes and Preston 1978; Wanapat et al 1997),
due to the condensed tannins acting to protect the protein from
fermentation in the rumen, thus increasing the supply of amino
acids to the small intestine. The supplementation should be the
aimed at contributing fermentable energy and protein to the rumen
to stimulate fibre digestion (Silva and Ørskov 1985). Cassava hay
supplementation, especially at 1-2 kg/hd/d, clearly improved rumen
efficiency, reduced production costs and increased economical
returns (Wanapat et al 2000).
Based result on this experiment it can be concluded that: in
swamp buffalo fed rice straw and rumen supplement (urea &
minerals):
Supplementation with cassava hay improved rumen ecology,
digestibility and feed intake, but did not effected rumen pH and
VFA concentration
Supplementation with coconut oil alone (6% of the diet DM)
reduced numbers of rumen protozoa, negative effect on rumen
ecology, reduce DM digestibility and live weight gain, but did not
affect DM intake, proportions of rumen VFA.
The use of cassava hay as a protein source in diets for
ruminants can be highly recommended, and it can be an appropriate
feeding strategy to improve livestock production, especially in the
dry season. However, further research relating to oil
supplementation in cassava hay based-diets should be conducted,
especially for both draft and fattening buffalo production
on-farm.
The authors are extremely grateful to the Swedish International
Development Agency (Sida), Department for Research Cooperation with
Developing Countries (SAREC), through the MEKARN regional project
for supporting this thesis research. Thanks also to the National
Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), Livestock
Research Center (LRC) and Tropical Feed Resources Research and
Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty
of Agriculture, Khon Kean University, Thailand, for permission to
use their research facilities and for their
cooperation.
Allen R D 1984 Feedstuffs ingredient analysis table.
Feedstuffs (USA), p. 25-30
AOAC 1990 Official methods of analysis. Association of
official Analysis (15th edition). Washington, D.C,
U.S.A
Boniface A N, Murray R M and Hogan J P 1986 Optimum level of ammonia in the rumen liquor of cattle fed tropical pasture hay. In: Proceedings of Australian Society of Animal Production 16:151-154
Bryant M P 1973 Nutritional requirements of the predominant rumen cellulolytic bacteria. Federation Proceedings. Volume 32 (7) 1809-1813
Chantalakhana C 2001 Urgent Need in Buffalo Development
for Food Security and Self-Sufficiency.
Workshop on Swamp buffalo in
Chanthai S, Wanapat M and Wachirapakorn C 1989 Rumen ammonia-N and Volatile fatty acid concentrations in cattle and buffalo given rice straw-based diets. In:Proc. 7th AFAR Int. Workshop. (Editor. R Dixon), IDPD, Canberra, Australia
Church D C 1976 Rumen metabolism of lipids. Digestive physiology and nutrition of ruminants. Oregon, USA, pp. 253-265
Ffoulkes D and Preston T R 1978
Cassava or sweet potato forage as combined sources of protein and
roughage in molasses based diets: effect of supplementation with
soybean meal. Tropical Animal Production (3) :186-192 http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/tap33/
France J and Siddons R C 1993 Volatile fatty acid production. In: Quantitative Aspects Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism (Editors, J M Forbes and J France). C.A.B. International, Willingford, UK
Galyean M 1989 Laboratory Procedure in Animal Nutrition Research. Development of Animal and Life Science. New Mexico States University, USA
Goering H K and Van Soest P J 1970 Forage fiber analysis. ARS. Handbook N. 379. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, U.S.A
Hungate R E 1966 The Rumen and It's Microbe Academic Press, New York, NY
Leng R A 1982 Modification of rumen fermentation. In: Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures. (Editor: J B Hacker). CAB, Farnham Royal, U.K. pp 427-453
Lewis D 1957 Blood-urea concentration in relation to protein utilization in the ruminant. Journal of Agricultural Science 48, 438
Looper M , Stokes S R, Waldner D N and Jordan
E R 2001 Managing milk composition: Feed additives and production enhancers.
McDonald P, Edwards R A, Greenhalgh J F D and Morgan C A 1996 Animal nutrition. Longman Singapore Publisher, Pte
McDonald P, Edwards R A, Greenhalgh J F D and Morgan C A 2002 Digestion. Animal nutrition, sixth edition. pp. 163-198
Minitab Software Version Release 14 2003 MINITAB® and the MINITAB logo® are registered trademarks of Minitab Inc. Released 14 for Windows®, USA
Mom Seng, Preston T R, Leng R A and Meulen U 2001 Effect
of a single drench of cooking oil on the rumen ecosystem and
performance of young local "yellow" cattle fed rice straw and
cassava foliage. Livestock for rural development.
Moss A R, Jouany J P and Newbold J 2000 Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de Zootechnie 49: 231-253 http://animres.edpsciences.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/animres/pdf/2000/03/z0305.pdf
Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan, Nguyen Trong Ngu, Nguyen Thiet, Preston
T R and Leng RA 2005a Determination of the optimum level of a
soybean oil drench with respect to the rumen ecosystem, feed intake
and digestibility in cattle. Workshop-seminar, MEKARN-CTU.
Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan, Nguyen Trong Ngu, Vo Van Son, Preston T
R and Leng R A 2005b Effect of an oil drench on the growth rate
of cattle fattened on grass, supplemented with molasses, rice bran
or rice straw. Workshop-seminar, MEKARN-CTU.
Nguyen Thi Hong Nhan, Nguyen Van Hon, Ngu N T, Von N T, Preston T R and Leng R A 2001 Practical Application of Defaunation of Cattle on Farms in Vietnam: Response of Young Cattle Fed Rice Straw and Grass to a Single Drench of Groundnut oil. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 14 (4): 485-490
Nguyen Van Thu 2001 Effect of urea-molasses-mineral
supplementation on in vivo, in situ and in vitro feed digestibility
of swamp buffaloes. Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of
Agriculture, Cantho University, Cantho city, Vietnam. http://www.mekarn.org/procbuf/thu.htm
Nguyen Van Thu 2005 Effect of supplementation with
sesbania (Sesbania grandiflora) leaves on rumen parameters,
and in vivo, in sacco and in vitro
digestibility in swamp buffaloes fed rice straw or elephant grass.
Workshop-seminar, MEKARN-CTU.
Nguyen Van Thu and Preston T R 1999 Rumen environment and feed degradability in swamp buffaloes fed different supplements. Livestock Research for Rural Develoment 11(3): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd11/3/thu113.htm
Nguyen Xuan Trach and Mai Thi Thom 2004 Responses of
growing beef cattle to a feeding regime combining road side grazing
and rice straw feeding supplemented with urea and brewers' grains
following an oil drench. Livestock Research for Rural Development.
Palmquist D L and Jenkins T C 1980 Fat in lactation
rations: review. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 1-14
http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/63/1/1
Perdok H B and Leng R A 1989 Effect of supplementation with protein meal on the growth of cattle given a basal diet of untreated ammoniated rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 3:269
Preston T R and Leng R A 1987 Manipulation of feeding and the rumen ecosystem. Anonymous. Matching ruminant production system with available resources in the Tropics and Sub-tropics. Penambul books, Armidale, Australia, pp. 83-92
Promkot C and Wanapat M 2003 Ruminal degradation and
intestinal digestion of crude protein of tropical protein resources
using nylon bag technique and three-step in vitro procedure
in dairy cattle. Livestock Research for Rural Development
Roseler D K, Ferguson J D, Sniffen C J and Herema J 1993
Dietary protein degradability effect on plasma and milk urea
nitrogen and milk non-protein in Holstein cows. Journal of dairy
Science 76: 525
Samuel M, Sagathewan S, Thomas J and Methen G 1997 An
HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acid for ruminal.
Indian Journal of Animal Science 67 (9) 805-807
Scientific Psychic 2005 Fats, Oils, Fatty acids,
Triglycerides-Chemical Structure.
Silva A N and Ørskov E R 1985 Effect of unmolassed sugarbeet pulp on the rate of straw degradation in the rumen of sheep given barley straw. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44:50A
Stur W, Gray D and Bastin G 2002 Review of the Livestock
Sector in the Lao People's Democratic Republic, International
Livestock Research Institute, DAPO 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines.
http://www.ilri.org/
Tran Quoc Viet and Dao Duc Kien 2005 Effects of
supplementation of cassava hay as a high protein feed source to the
rice straw ration and Vong nem (Erythrina senegalensis),
leaves as herbal medicine against helminths, on growth rate and
feed utilization efficiency of local beef cattle under household
conditions. Workshop-seminar, MEKARN-CTU. Making Better Use of
Local Feed Resources
Vongsamphanh P and
Wanapat M 2004 Comparison of cassava hay yield and
chemical composition of local and introduced varieties and effects of levels of
cassava hay supplementation in native beef cattle fed on rice straw. Livestock
Research for Rural Development
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/8/vong16055.htm
Wanapat M 1999 Feeding of ruminants in the tropics based
on local feed resources. M Wanapat (Editor). Department of animal
science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kean, Thailand.
Wanapat M 2000 Rumen manipulation to increase the efficient use of local feed resources and productivity of ruminants in the tropics. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 13(Suppl.): 59-67
Wanapat M 2001a
Role of cassava hay as animal feed in the tropics.
Wanapat M 2001b
Swamp Buffalo Rumen Ecology and Its Manipulation,.
Wanapat M, Ngamsang A, Kokhunlot S, Nontaso N, Wachirapakom C and Rowlinson P 2000a A comparative study on the ruminal microbial population of cattle and swamp buffalo raised under traditional village condition in the NE of Thailand. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 13:918-921
Wanapat M, Puramongkon T and Siphuak W 2000b Feeding of
cassava hay for lactating dairy cows during the dry season.
Asian-Australasian Journal
of Animal Science 13:
Wanapat M, Petlum A and Chanthai S 2005
Effects of levels of urea and coconut oil on rumen ecology, milk yield and
composition in lactating dairy cows fed on urea-treated rice straw.
Wanapat M and Pimpa O 1999 Effect of ruminant NH3-N levels on ruminant fermentation, purin derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 12 (6) 904-907
Wanapat M, Pimpa O, Petlum A and Boontao U 1997 Cassava hay: A new strategic feed for ruminants during the dry season. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 9 (2): http://www.cipav.org.co/LRRD/lrrd9/2/metha92.htm
Wanapat M, Topark-ngarm A, Wanapat S, Luandtong and Taesakun S 1989 The nutritive value of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L) residues and supplementation levels of cowpea residues for native cattle fed on rice straw. Proceedings of 27 th Annual Meeting, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
Yuangklang C, Wora-anu S, Wanapat M, Nontaso N and
Wachirapakorn C 2001 Effects of roughage source on rumen
microbes, feed intake and digestibility in swamp buffaloes.