Workshop-seminar, 23-25 May, 2005, MEKARN-CTU |
Contents |
In total 40 Yorkshire x Landrace pregnant sows from the 2 nd to the 5 th litter were allocated to 4 dietary treatments, and given diets with 0 (CLM0), 10 (CLM10), 20 (CLM20) and 30 % (CLM30) inclusion of cassava leaf meal (CLM). Treatment groups were balanced for breed and litter number. The sows were fed the experimental diets from 21 days of pregnancy to farrowing.
For treatments CLM0, CLM10, CLM20 and CLM30 the mean number of piglets born/litter was 9.9, 12.7, 11.2 and 11.7, respectively, and number weaned/litter 8.50, 10.1, 9.18, and 9.33, respectively. Birth weights per piglet were 1.59, 1.42, 1.67 and 1.43 kg, and total litter weight 15.5, 17.6, 16.9 and 16.6 kg, respectively. The mean weaning weights per piglet were 6.31, 6.11, 6.20 and 6.56 kg , respectively, and total weaning weights per litter increased by on average 5.6 % in the CLM fed groups, and were 54.2, 61.6, 56.8 and 61.4 kg/litter, respectively.
It was
concluded that up to 30 % of cassava leaf meal can be included in
the diet of pregnant sows without any detrimental effects on
reproduction.
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a widely grown crop
in most countries in the tropical regions of Africa, Latin America
and Asia, and ranks as one of the main crops in the tropical
countries (Calpe 1992). Dried cassava leaves (CL) are a good
source of protein, minerals, and vitamins. The yield of cassava
leaves (as dry matter, DM) as a by product of root harvesting may
amount to as much as 4.6 tones/ha (Ravindran et al 1990). With
adequate irrigation, fertilization and harvested from 4 months of
age in a cycle of 60 - 75 days, annual leaf DM yields of over 21
tons/ha can be obtained (Ravindran 1993).
Numerous reports have shown that cassava leaf has a high but
variable protein content (170 to 400 g/kg CP on a dry matter
basis), with almost 0.85 of the crude protein fraction as true
protein (Ravindran 1993). While cassava leaf protein is low in
sulfur amino acids (Gomez and Valdivieso1984), the content of most other
essential amino acids is higher than in soybean meal (Eggum 1970).
However, the high fiber content of leaf meals is a major factor
limiting their exploitation as a source of protein and other
nutrients for non-ruminant animals (Just 1982a,b). Sows should be
able to digest high fibre diets more efficiently than growing pigs,
and pregnant sows can use high fiber diets at up to 9-12% crude fibre in the
diet DM. Anti-nutritional factors, such as HCN and tannins, can
possibly limit the use of this product in sow diets. However very
little research has been done on the effects of cassava leaf meal
(CLM) on sow performance.
Therefore, the main objectives of this study were to determine
the optimum level of inclusion of sun-dried cassava leaves in diets
for pregnant sows with respect to effects on reproductive
performance.
In total 40 Yorkshire and Landrace sows at 21 days of pregnancy,
and from 3rd to 6th litter were allocated
into 4 treatments (10 sows per treatment) to determine the effects
of cassava leaf meal in the pregnancy diet on performance. The sows
were balanced for breed and litter number among
treatments.
Four levels of cassava leaf meal of 0, 10, 20, and 30% CLM (of
DM) were included in the basal diet to give treatment CLM0, CLM10,
CLM20, and CLM30 respectively. The basal diet included maize,
cassava root meal, rice bran, soybean meal, fish meal and mineral
and vitamin supplements. Oil was added to treatment CLM30 to
balance the energy content. CLM replaced rice bran (on a w/w
basis). The feed formulation and chemical composition of the diets
are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Ingredient and chemical composition of the experimental diets |
||||
|
CLM0 |
CLM10 |
CLM20 |
CLM30 |
Maize |
371 |
370.2 |
379.6 |
379.2 |
Cassava root meal |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Rice bran |
373.2 |
273.2 |
173.2 |
73.2 |
Cassava leaf meal |
0 |
100 |
200 |
300 |
Oil |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5.3 |
Soybean meal |
60 |
60 |
54 |
52 |
Fish meal |
68.5 |
68.5 |
68.5 |
68.5 |
Limestone |
13.2 |
13.2 |
9 |
5.3 |
Salt |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
Monocalcium phosphate |
4.7 |
5.5 |
6.3 |
7.1 |
Premix |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
Chemical composition |
|
|
|
|
ME (kcal/kg)* |
2971 |
2947 |
2938 |
2957 |
Crude protein |
14.7 |
15.5 |
16.2 |
16.96 |
Ether extract |
6.50 |
6.13 |
5.80 |
5.44 |
Crude fiber |
5.68 |
5.97 |
6.25 |
6.53 |
Lysine* |
0.92 |
0.98 |
1.03 |
1.09 |
Methionine* |
0.31 |
0.33 |
0.34 |
0.36 |
Calcium |
0.84 |
0.95 |
0.91 |
0.89 |
Phosphorus |
0.76 |
0.73 |
0.70 |
0.67 |
*Calculated values |
Cassava leaves were collected at root harvesting time, and sun dried for 2 days then ground to pass a 1 mm screen before mixing with the other ingredients. The cassava leaf meal was included in the diets from the 21st day of pregnancy to farrowing.
Sows were kept in individual pens with a concrete floor during
the pregnancy period, and in crates in lactation. Piglets had a
closed heated areas to protect them against the cold for 2 weeks
after birth.
During the pregnancy period sows were fed restricted diets,
with the daily feed allowance according to the following schedule.
In the first stage (from the 1st day after insemination
to 84th day of pregnancy) the sows were fed 1.6 to 1.8
kg/day. In the second stage (from day 84 to 107) they were fed 3.0
to 3.5 kg per day. In the lactation period (from farrowing to
weaning of the piglets) the sows were fed ad libitum a diet
without cassava leaves. Piglets were fed a commercial pre-starter
(21.5% crude protein) from day 7 to weaning (28 days). Sows and
piglets were given free access to water from nipple
drinkers.
Cassava leaves and the experimental diets were analysed for
crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and crude fiber (CF)
according to AOAC (1998). NDF was determined by the method of Van
Soest et al (1991). Energy and amino acid concentrations were calculated from feed
composition tables.
Sow performance was evaluated with respect to feed intake in
both pregnancy and lactation periods, weight gain during pregnancy
and weight loss during lactation. The effect of cassava leaf fiber
on the occurrence of MMA problems was also determined with respect
to the rectal temperature of the sows after farrowing. Weaning to
service interval was also recorded
Piglet performance included data on litter size, survival rate
at birth and weaning, weight at birth and at weaning and finally an
economic evaluation was carried out based on a comparison of feed
costs among treatments.
The General Linear Model of Minitab Statistical Software Version 13 (2001) was used. Least -square means (LSM) were compared statistically using the Tukey test (P<0.05). Regression analyses of the effect of level of CLM inclusion against number of piglets born and weaned were done using the regression models in the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.
Chemical composition of CLM was: CP, 22.5%; lipids, 5% and
fiber, 8.8 %. The replacement of rice bran by CLM did not change
the energy content of the diets significantly, but led to
increases in the CP content. The fiber content of the diets
increased gradually with inclusion level of CLM, the difference
amounting to 0.3% CF for each 10% increase in CLM inclusion (Table
1)
The number of piglets born was higher in the groups
fed CLM than in the control group, by 1.3 to 2.8 piglets/litter. The highest
litter size was for the treatment CLM10.
Table 2. Effects of inclusion of CLM in the diet on the performance of pregnant sows |
|||||
|
CLM0 |
CLM10 |
CLM20 |
CLM30 |
SEM |
Number of sows |
10 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
|
No of piglets born/litter |
9.9 |
12.7 |
11.2 |
11.7 |
0.92 |
No of weaned pigs/litter |
8.5a |
10.1 b |
9.2 a |
9.4 a |
0.35 |
Birth weight (kg/litter) |
15.5 |
17.6 |
16.9 |
16.6 |
1.34 |
Birth weight (kg/piglet) |
1.6 |
1.4 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
0.07 |
Weaning weight/litter (kg) |
54.0 |
61.6 |
56.8 |
61.4 |
3.1 |
Weaning weight (kg/piglet) |
6.2 |
6.1 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
0.22 |
a b Means within rows with different superscripts differ (P<0.05) |
The highest number weaned was for the treatment CLM10. and was 10.1 piglets/litter. On average the number of piglets weaned in the CLM fed groups was 1 piglet/litter higher than in the control group. Due to higher litter size, the total weaning weights per litter were higher in the CLM fed groups, the differences ranging from 2.8 to 7.6 kg/litter.
The higher performance of the CLM fed groups was possibly due to
the higher content of vitamins and minerals and the better amino
acid profile of CLM than of rice bran. Especially beta-carotene can
increase the production of uterine specific proteins which support
embryo survival. It also contains a basic glycoprotein with
iron-binding capacity and a group of acidic proteins with immuno-
suppressive capabilities. Beta-carotene also increases the
production of progesterone during the initial formation of the
corpora lutea.
The sows consumed similar amounts of feed during pregnancy because feed was restricted (Table 3). There were no feed refusals recorded during the experimental period, even at the highest level of inclusion of cassava leaf meal.
Table 3. Effects of inclusion level of CLM on feed intake of sows and weight changes during the experiment |
|||||
|
CLM0 |
CLM10 |
CLM20 |
CLM30 |
SEM |
Feed intakes, kg/day |
|
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy |
2.3 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
0.01 |
Lactation |
4.9 |
4.9 |
5.0 |
5.1 |
0.04 |
Weight changes, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial weight at 21 days |
194 |
193 |
191 |
200 |
7.7 |
Weight at 107 days |
235 |
233 |
230 |
238 |
6.9 |
Weight gain |
40.6 |
40.0 |
39.5 |
38.3 |
3.2 |
Lactation |
|
|
|
|
|
After farrowing |
221 |
217 |
216 |
219 |
7.2 |
At weaning |
201 |
197 |
198 |
201 |
6.3 |
Weight loss |
20.0 |
19.9 |
18.1 |
17.3 |
3.4 |
% weight loss |
9.05 |
9.17 |
8.38 |
7.25 |
|
The mean weight gain during pregnancy was around 40 kg. There were no differences among treatments both during pregnancy and lactation
The average body temperatures of the sows during the 5 days
after farrowing for treatments CLM0 to CLM30 were 38.7, 38.7, 38.6,
38.6 °C, respectively. This shows that sows
in the experiment did not have MMA problems. There were no
differences in weaning to service interval among treatments, and it
ranged from 5.2 to 5.3 days.
There were no sign of toxicity recorded in sows and piglets
during the experiment. It can be concluded therefore that the CLM
used in the experiment was safe for animals, even at the high level
(CLM30) of inclusion in the diet. This might have been due to the
fact that the HCN level in dried leaves was low, as other studies
have shown that 90 % of HCN is eliminated during sun drying (Bui Huy Nhu Phuc
et al 2001).
Pregnant sows can utilize high fiber diets, and so cassava can be a useful feed ingredient for sows during pregnancy. It is not only high in protein but also in vitamins and minerals. It can give good reproductive performance.
AOAC 1998 Official methods of analysis, Association of
Official Analytical Chemists, 13th edn. Washington DC.
Bui Huy Nhu Phuc, Ogle B and Lindberg
J K 2001
Nutritive value of cassava leaves for monogastric animals.
International Workshop "Current Research and Development on use of
Cassava as Animal Feed". p 31-40.
Calpe C
1992 Roots, tubers and
plantains: Recent trends in production, trade and use. In: Machin,
D., Nyvild, S. (Eds) Roots , Tubers, Plantains and Bananas in
Animal Feeding. FAO Anim. Prod. and Health Paper 95: 11-25.
Eggum O L 1970 The protein quality of cassava leaves. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 761-769.
Gomez G and Valdivieso M 1984
Cassava for animal feeding: Effect of variety
and plant age on production of leaves and roots. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.
11,49-55.
Just A
1982b The influence of ground barley straw on
the net energy value of diets for growth in pigs. Livestock
Production Science 9,717-729.
Just A
1982a The influence of crude fibre from cereals
on the net energy value of diets for growth in pigs. Livestock
Production Science 9, 569-580.
Minitab Statistical Software version 12
1998 User's
guide to statistics. Minitab Inc., USA
Ravindran V 1993
Cassava leaves as animal feed:
Potential and limitations. Journal of the Science of Food and
Agriculture 61: 141-150.
Ravindran V 1990
Cassava leaf meal. In: Thacker P A and Kirkwood R N (Eds). Non-traditional feed sources for use in
swine production. Butterworths, Boston. pp. 91-101.
Van Soest P J, Roberton J B and Lewis B A 1991
Methods for
dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch
polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74,
3583-3579.