Back to content

Live stock production, climate change and resource depletion

Citation

 The supplementation of dried cassava chips in growing rabbit diets to improve growth performance and economic returns

Nguyen Thi Kim Dong and Nguyen Van Thu

Cantho University, Cantho City, Vietnam
ntkdong@ctu.edu.vn

 

Abstract

In a feeding trial, 60 crossbred rabbits with average initial  live weight of 735±4.64g and 8 weeks of age were fed 5 levels of dried cassava chips (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 g/rabbit/day) as a supplement to Para grass fed ad libitum. In experiment 2, 30 crossbred rabbits at 12 weeks of age with average live weight of 1213±147g were used to measure digestibility and N balance.

Increasing the offer level of dried cassava chips in a basal diet of Para grass fed to growing rabbits led to linear increases in total DM intake, live weight gain, coefficients of apparent digestibility and N retention. There were positive linear relationships between coefficients of apparent DM digestibility and live weight gain and N retention. It was proposed that the determinant of rabbit growth rate in forage-based diets is the overall apparent digestibility of the diet rather than the composition of the diet in terms of the relative proportions of soluble and structural carbohydrates.

Key words: carbohydrates, digestibility. feed conversion, N balance, Para grass

Introduction

Rabbits are raised in almost all developing countries, including Vietnam, and contribute to improving the nutrition and economy of famer smallholders, both as a source of animal protein as well as a source of extra income. Rabbit meat has been also considered as good meat for it's high content of protein , low fat  and low cholesterol levels (Owen 1992).

In the Mekong delta of Vietnam feeding of rabbits is mainly based on natural grasses and agro-industrial by products (Nguyen Thi Kim Dong and Nguyen Van Thu 2009) so the cost for rabbit production is lower than for the other animal species ones. This study aimed to evaluate the potential benefits from supplementing Para grass with dried cassava chips in diets of growing rabbits. 

Materials and methods

Animals and experimental design

Two experiments were carried out at the Experimental farm in Cantho City. For the feeding trial, sixty crossbred rabbits (local x improved breeds) at 8 weeks of age with average initial weight around 735g, were arranged in a completely randomized design with 5 treatments and 3 replications. Four rabbits balanced for sex were the  experimental unit. The treatments were dried cassava chips (DC) supplemented to the Para grass (PG) basal diet at levels of 0 (DC0), 10 (DC10), 20 (DC20), 30 (DC30) and 40g (DC40) / day/ animal. Soybean waste  was offered at 150g/day/animal and extracted soybean meal was fed at 7-11g/day/animal for adjustment of the same protein level of 11.5g/day/rabbit. The experimental period lasted 9 weeks.

In the digestibility trial, the experimental design was similar to that of the feeding trial; 30 rabbits at 12 weeks-old  with live weight around 1200g were used. The animals had two week for adaptation and another week for feces and urine collection. Feeds offered and refusals were  measured daily. Urine was collected for nitrogen analysis to calculate the nitrogen retention.  DM, CP, EE, and NDF apparent digestibility coefficients were calculated according to McDonald et al (2002).   

Feeds, feeding and management

Para grass was collected daily in the areas surrounding the farm. Soybean waste was bought daily from the soybean milk factory in the city;  cassava chips and extracted soybean meal were bought on one occasion from an animal feed shop  for using throughout the trials. The animals were fed three times a day at 7:30h, 14:00h and 18:00h. Fresh water was always  available. The animals were vaccinated against rabbit hemorrhagic and parasite diseases.

Measurements

The measurements taken were  intakes of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), ash, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), daily weight gain, feed conversion ratio, economic returns, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention. Chemical analyses of DM, OM, CP, EE, CF, NDF and Ash followed the procedure of AOAC (1990) and Van Soest et al (1991).

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) option in the ANOVA program of the Minitab software (Minitab 2000). The comparison of differences between two treatments was done by the Tukey option of Minitab  (2000).

Results and discussion

Experiment 1. Feeding trial

The values for ingredient composition (Table 1) are in agreement with those compiled by Gőhl (1971)

Table 1: Chemical composition of feeds (% in DM except for DM which is on fresh basis, and ME ) in the feeding trial

 

DM

OM

CP

EE

CF

NDF

Ash

ME MJ/kg

Para grass

17.4

89.6

12.3

5.09

28.9

67.1

11.2

8.72

Dried cassava chips

94.3

97.1

2.70

1.59

3.39

15.6

3.09

13.4

Soya waste

12.0

95.3

21.3

15.4

3.50

35.0

4.96

13.1

Extracted soybean

87.9

90.1

42.8

3.22

3.70

27.4

11.3

12.4

DM: dry matter, OM: organic matter, CP: crude protein, NDF: neutral detergent fiber.
ME: calculated according to
Maertens
et al.(2002)

Feed intake and growth performance

Intake of Para grass declined as the offer level of cassava chips was increased (Table 2). Actual intake of cassava chips was slightly less than the offer level, but was strongly and positively related to total DM intake and growth rate (Table 3; Figures 1 and 2). Strangely, there was no relationship between cassava chip intake and feed conversion.  Under the conditions in Vietnam, economic benefits were increased by almost 70% by supplementing Para grass with cassava chips (Table 3). The results are in marked contrast with those reported by Hongthong Phimmmasan et al (2004),  where there was no improvement in growth rate of rabbits when a water spinach basal diet was supplemented with broken rice, a carbohydrate source of similar composition to cassava chips.  The reason may be that the response to supplementation with a starch-rich carbohydrate is more a function of the effect on the digestibility of the diet, than of the nature of the carbohydrate. In this respect, the digestibility of Para grass is considerably inferior to that of water spinach (Nguyen Thi Kim Dong et al 2006).  Supporting evidence for this hypothesis is presented in the results from Experiment 2.

Table 2: Daily intakes of feeds (g DM/animal) and fed components (g/animal) of rabbits in the feeding trial

Item

Treatment

SEM/P

DC0

DC10

DC20

DC30

DC40

Cassava chips

-

7.80a

17.8b

25.4c

34.3d

1.03/0.001

Para grass

31.7a

25.3b

25.7b

20.0c

22.3bc

2.00/0.001

DM

53.4a

55.2a

68.2b

68.5b

79.9c

1.43/0.001

OM

48.7a

51.0a

63.4b

64.3b

75.3c

1.33/0.001

CP

11.0

10.4

11.2

10.3

10.6

0.26/0.140

EE                   

4.02ab

3.92a

4.47bc

4.18abc

4.55c

0.11/0.008

NDF

28.0a

25.1ab

27.8ab

24.7b

27.7ab

0.69/0.012

ME, MJ/animal

0.56a

0.62a

0.79b

0.82b

0.96c

0.16/0.001

DC0: basal diet, DC10, DC20,DC30 and DC40: DC supplementation at levels of 10, 20, 30, and 40g, respectively.
Means with different letters within the same rows are different at P<0.05.
ME: calculated according to Maertens et al (2002)

 

Table 3: Mean values for changes in live weight, feed conversion and economic return

Item

Treatment

SEM/P

DC0

DC10

DC20

DC30

DC40

Initial weight, g

737

735

738

727

738

5.53/0.567

Final weight, g

1755a

1848ab

2047abc

2083bc

2255c

67.5/0.003

Daily gain, g

16.2a

17.7ab

20.8abc

21.5bc

24.1c

1.09/0.002

FCR

3.33       

3.13       

3.28

3.18

3.35

0.14/0.761

Total cost, VND

61,268

63,194

67,534

69,393

72,709

 

Total income, VND

78,975

83,175

92,100

93,750

101,475

 

Net income, VND

17,707

19,981

24,566

24,357

28,766

 

Means with different letters within the same row are different at P<0.05

 

Figure 1. Relationship between daily intake of cassava chips and total DM intake Figure 2. Relationship between daily intake of cassava chips and growth rate

  

Carcass traits of growing rabbits

Cassava chip supplementation had no effect on the proportions of total lean meat and thigh lean meat in the carcass but increased the meat: bone ratio (Table 4).  When  corrected for final live weight, the weight and length of the caecum was decreased by cassava chip supplementation, presumably reflecting the reduction in dietary fiber as cassava chips replaced Para grass.

Table 4: Mean values of slaughter weights, carcass traits and internal organs of growing rabbits

Item

Treatment

SEM/P

DC0

DC10

DC20

DC30

DC40

Live weight, g

1785a

1887 a

2068 ab

2081ab

2291b

73.0/0.005

Carcass weight, g

852a

904a

955a

1019ab bc

1143b

51.0/0.019

% Carcass

47.7

47.9

46.1

49.0

49.8

1.19/0.32

% Lean meat

73.9

75.3

72.4

68.8

77.3

1.89/0.08

% Thigh

28.5

26.8

25.6

28.6

28.5

1.59/0.61

Lean meat/bone

3.11

3.08

3.18

3.49

3.89

0.44/0.34

Caecum length, cm/kg LW

28.2

28.5

23.4

26.6

26.0

 

Caecum weight, g/kg LW

8.18

7.37

7.06

7.16

6.42

 

Means with different letters within the same rows are different at P<0.05

Experiment 2. Digestibility trial

The ingredients used in this experiment were similar in composition (Table 5) to those used in the feeding trial.

Table 5: Chemical composition of feed ingredients (% in DM, except for DM which is on fresh basis) in the digestibility trial

Feed

DM

OM

CP

EE

CF

NDF

Ash

ME#

Para grass

21.4

87.7

10.9

4.97

28.9

67.4

12.8

8.41

Dried cassava chips

93.8

97.5

2.58

1.60

3.39

16.4

2.67

13.4

Soya waste

12.7

95.2

21.6

15.6

3.50

33.5

5.3

13.1

Extracted soybean

87.9

90.1

42.8

3.22

3.70

26.3

11.3

12.4

# Calculated as MJ/kg DM ( Marteans et al 2002)

Apparent digestibility and N balance

The trends in intake of Para grass and total DM were similar to those in Experiment 1 (Table 6). Coefficients of apparent digestibility of all dietary components increased linearly as the offer level of cassava chips was increased. N  retention expressed as a function of metabolic live weight showed the same trend.

Table 6 . Apparent nutrient digestibility (%) and nitrogen retention (g/kg W0.75) of rabbits

 

Treatment

SEM/P

DC0

DC10

DC20

DC30

DC40

   DM intake, g/day

Cassava chips

   0

7.80

17.5

24.9

36.6

 

Para grass

40.3

35.8

36.0

34.1

34.0

2.05/0.259

Total

63.6a

67.1a

78.4ab

82.9b

92.9b

3.77/0.002

Apparent digestibility, % 

 

 

 

DM

56.0a

66.9b

70.8bc

75.0cd

81.4d

1.71/0.001

OM

56.5a

70.0b

71.9bc

76.4cd

82.6d

1.60/0.001

CP

78.7

79.3

80.5

80.7

81.9

1.82/0.742

EE

72.6a

74.9ab

78.0ab

82.3bc

86.9c

1.70/0.001

NDF

46.9a

55.9ab

58.9b

62.6bc

70.9c

2.01/0.001

Nitrogen balance (g//kgW0.75)

Nitrogen intake

0.97

0.93

0.90

0.98

0.88

0.07/0.796

Nitrogen retention

0.48

0.48

0.53

0.58

0.64

0.05/0.208

Means with different letters within the same rows are different at P<0.05

In the discussion of experiment 1, it was hypothesized that the positive effect of supplementation with starch-rich carbohydrate was probably the result of increasing diet digestibility as Para grass was replaced by cassava root chips. The results from experiment 2 appear to confirm this hypothesis, as observed in the positive linear relationships between percentage apparent DM digestibility (experiment 2) and live weight gain in experiment 1 (Figure 3) and with N retention in experiment 2 (Figure 4). In trials with water spinach replacing Para grass, similar positive relationships  were observed between apparent  DM digestibility and live weight gain (Nguyen Thi Kim Dong et al 2006). Replacing 75% of the Para grass in he diet with water spinach increased apparent DM digestibility from 63 to 73% and growth rate from 13 to 19 g/day.

Figure 3.  Relationship between DM apparent digestibility (from experiment 2)  and live weight gain (from Experiment 1) Figure 4.  Relationship between DM apparent digestibility ( and N retention (from Experiment 2)

 

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support for this research received from the MEKARN program, financed by Sida.

References

AOAC 1990:  Official methods of analysis (15th edition), Washington, DC, Volume 1: 69-90.

Hongthong Phimmmasan, Siton Kongvongxay, Chhay Ty and Preston T R 2004: Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and Stylo 184 (Stylosanthes guianensis CIAT 184) as basal diets for growing rabbits. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. #34. Retrieved December 15, 111, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/5/hong16034.htm

Maertens L, Peter J M, Villamide M, Cervera C, Gidenne T and Xiccato G 2002: Nutritive value of raw materials for rabbit. World Rabbit Science 10 (4), pp. 157-166.

McDonald P, R A Edwards, J F D Greehalgh and C A Morgan 2002:  Animal Nutrition 6th Edition, Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, pp: 245-255.

Minitab  2000: Minitab reference manual release 13.20. Minitab Inc.

Nguyen Thi Kim Dong, Nguyen Van Thu, Ogle R B and Preston T R 2006: Effect of supplementation level of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) leaves in diets based on para grass (Brachiaria mutica) on intake, nutrient utilization, growth rate and economic returns of crossbred rabbits in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August,  2006. Article # 20. RetrievedDecember 15, 111, from http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/kimd2.htm

 

Nguyen Thi Kim Dong and Nguyen Van Thu 2009: The use of agro-industrial by productsfor raising crossbred rabbits in the Mekong delta of Vietnam. Conference on Asian Rabbit Production Development. Sep 10-11 2009. Changchun, China.pp: 156.

Owen J B 1992: Genetic aspects of appetite and food choice by animals. Journal of Agricultural Science 119: 151-155.

Van Soest P J, J B Robertson and B A Lewis 1991:  Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle: methods for dietary fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal Dairy Sci.ence 74: 3585-3597.

Go to top