Back to contents | Citation of this paper |
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect on methane production of potassium nitrate or urea as NPN sources in substrates containing varying ratios of sugar cane and Tithonia diversifolia. The treatments in a 6*2 factorial arrangements with 4 replications were: proportions of Tithonia leaf meal of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% replacing sugar cane (DM basis) and source of NPN (Potassium nitrate or urea).
Gas production, methane percentage in the gas, percent of substrate solubilized, and methane produced per unit substrate solubilized, were lower for nitrate than for urea at all levels of Tithonia leaf meal replacing derinded sugar cane in the substrate. When urea was the NPN source the level of Tithonia leaf meal did not affect gas production, but reduced it when nitrate was the source of NPN. The methane percentage in the gas, percent of substrate solubilized and methane produced per unit substrate solubilized, decreased linearly for both urea and nitrate with increasing levels of Tithonia leaf meal. There were no differences in ammonia concentration but VFA concentration was increased as Tithonia replaced sugar cane in the substrate. Ammonia and VFA concentrations were lower with nitrate than with urea.
Wild sunflower (Tithonia diversifolia) is a shrub widely spread in northern Laos where it is appreciated as a valuable green manure. In Western Kenya, it is renowned as a component of agro-forestry systems as it is rich in N, P and K which are essential for soil fertility (Jama et al 2000). According to Lijzenga (1998), the biomass from Tithonia has proved to be valuable in improving soil fertility for crop production in areas constrained by soil N, P and K deficiencies. It has been reported that addition of foliage of Tithonia diversifolia to the cropping area leads to double the yield of the crops and that it is more effective than urea when applied at the same N rate (Sanchez 2001).
The forage of Tithonia is also considered to have a potential use for livestock production (Mahecha and Rosales 1905). According to Pathoummalangsy and Preston (2008) the leaves of Tithonia foliage are readily consumed by goats in the fresh state. However, the protein in Tithonia leaves was shown to be 79% degradable in the rumen in 24h (Vargas 1994), which according to Preston and Leng (1987) would indicate that it would not be a good source of "bypass" protein. Thus one of the initiatives to improve the utilization of Tithonia foliage in goats was centered on supplying rapidly fermentable carbohydrate to utilize better the ammonia derived from fermentation of the soluble protein in the rumen. Thus supplementation of Tithonia foliage with cassava root chips gave positive results in terms of improved nitrogen retention in growing goats (Pathoummalangsy and Preston 2008). A similar response to fermentable carbohydrate in the form of sugar cane was reported by Sitone et al (2012), with improvements in feed intake and growth rate compared with feeding Tithonia foliage as the only feed.
There are many reports of antimicrobial activity in leaf extracts of Tithopnia: to protect crops from termites (Adoyo et al 1997), to control insects (Carino and Rejestes 1982; Dutta et al 1993), with medicinal value for treatment of hepatitis (Lin et al 1993; Kuo and Chen 1997), to control amoebic dysentery (Tona et al 1998) and to have broad spectrum activity against a range of bacteria associated with wound infections (Ogunfolakan et al 2010)]. folakan et al (2010). Leaf extracts of Tithonia were found to be as effective as Ivermectin in treating Scabies in rabbits (Hang et al 2012).
It was therefore hypothesized that such antimicrobial activity in the foliage of Tithonia diversifolia might be effective in reducing methane production in an in vitro rumen incubation.
The experiment was conducted in the laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forest Resources, Souphanouvong University, Luang Prabang province, Lao PDR, from January to February 2012.
The experimental design was a 6*2 factorial arrangement with four replications of the following treatments in a random block design:
Table 1. Ingredients in the substrate, g DM |
||||||||||||
|
Proportion of Tithonia (%) in the substrate |
|||||||||||
|
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
100 |
||||||
|
KN |
U |
KN |
U |
KN |
U |
KN |
U |
KN |
U |
KN |
U |
Tithonia leaves |
2.4 |
2.4 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
7.20 |
7.20 |
9.60 |
9.60 |
11.3 |
11.8 |
||
Sugar cane stalk |
11.3 |
11.8 |
8.88 |
9.38 |
6.48 |
6.98 |
4.08 |
4.58 |
1.68 |
2.18 |
||
Urea |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
||||||
KNO3 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
The equipment and procedure was that used by Sangkhom Inthapanya et al (2011) (Photos 1 and 2).
Photo 1. The in vitro system |
Photo 2. Gas production after incubation |
Experimental procedure
Fresh sugar cane stalk was collected from the farm of Souphanouvong University. The outer rind was removed with a knife and the central part (the sugar-rich pith) chopped into small pieces (about 2mm section) and then ground (1mm sieve). The Tithonia leaves were brought from Parkou district, Luang Prabang province (Photo 3). The sample was chopped into small pieces of around 1-2 cm of length, then ground (1 mm sieve). They were mixed with sugar cane stalk as substrate and either potassium nitrate or urea as NPN sources (Table 1) prior to adding 0.96 liters of buffer solution (Table 2) and 240 ml of rumen fluid (obtained from a newly slaughtered buffalo in the village abattoir), and put in the incubation bottle which was then gassed with carbon dioxide. The bottles were incubated at 38 0C in a water bath for 24 hours.
Photo 3. Tithonia diversifolia foliage |
Table 2. Ingredients of the buffer solution |
|||||||
Ingredients |
CaCl2 |
NaHPO4.12H2O |
NaCl |
KCl |
MgSO4.7H2O |
NaHCO3 |
Cysteine |
(g/liter) |
0.04 |
9.30 |
0.47 |
0.57 |
0.12 |
9.80 |
0.25 |
Source: Tilly and Terry (1963) |
The gas volume and the percentage of methane in the gas (Crowcon infra-red analyser; Crowcon Instruments Ltd, UK) were recorded for the separate incubations after 24 hours. At the end of the incubation the residual DM in the incubation bottle was determined by filtering through cloth and drying (100°C for 24 hours). Samples of filtrate (10 ml) were used to determine ammonia (NH3). Samples of 20 ml were used to determine volatile fatty acid (VFA). Methods for ammonia and VFA were those described by Ly and Nguyen Van Lai (1997).
The data were analyzed by the General Linear Model (GLM) option in the ANOVA program of the Minitab (2000) Software. Sources of variation in the model were: NPN source; proportion of Tithonia leaves, interaction NPN*proportion of leaves and error.
Results
Table 3. Chemical composition of ingredients in the substrate |
|||
|
Fresh Tithonia leaf |
Tithonia leaf meal |
Sugar cane stalk |
DM, % |
30.8 |
85.0 |
24.9 |
CP in DM, % |
22.9 |
20.1 |
5.2 |
CP solubility, % |
35.6 |
33.4 |
11.9 |
Effect of proportion of Tithonia leaves and NPN source on methane production
Gas production, methane percentage in the gas, percent of substrate solubilized, and methane produced per unit substrate solubilized, were higher for urea than for nitrate, for all levels of TLM (Table 1; Figures 1-4). When urea was the NPN source the level of TLM did not affect gas production, but reduced it when nitrate was the source of NPN. For methane percentage in the gas, percent of substrate solubilized and methane produced per unit substrate solubilized, the values decreased linearly for both urea and nitrate as tghe proporion of TLM was increased..
Table 4. Mean values of gas production, per cent of methane, DM solubilised and methane production per unit DM solubilized |
|||||||||||
|
Levels of Tithonia leaves |
|
NPN source |
|
|
||||||
|
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
100 |
Prob. |
K-nitrate |
Urea |
SEM |
Prob. |
Gas production, ml |
1294 |
1400 |
1444 |
1463 |
1506 |
1456 |
<0.001 |
1310 |
1544 |
16.0 |
<0.001 |
Methane, % |
23 |
22 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
20 |
<0.001 |
19.8 |
22.5 |
0.17 |
<0.001 |
Methane, ml |
294 |
304 |
307 |
307 |
311 |
294 |
0.335 |
259 |
346 |
3.85 |
<0.001 |
DM solubilized, % |
50.4 |
56.7 |
59.9 |
61.2 |
64.7 |
63.9 |
<0.001 |
55.8 |
63.2 |
0.38 |
<0.001 |
CH4, ml/g DM substrate solubilized |
49.9 |
46.3 |
44.1 |
43.2 |
41.6 |
39.8 |
<0.001 |
41.4 |
46.9 |
0.60 |
<0.001 |
Figure 1. Effect of proportion of Tithonia leaf meal replacing sugar cane stalk on gas production with K-nitrate or urea as NPN source |
Figure 2. Effect of proportion of Tithonia leaf meal replacing sugar cane stalk on percentage methane in the gas with K-nitrate or urea as NPN source |
Figure 3. Effect of proportion of Tithonia leaves replacing sugar cane stalk on percentage of substrate solubilized with K-nitrate or urea as NPN source |
Figure 4. Effect of proportion of Tithonia leaves replacing sugar cane stalk on methane produced per unit substrate solubilized with K-nitrate or urea as NPN source |
Rumen ammonia and VFA
Ammonia levels were higher for urea than for nitrate and were not affected by level of TLM (Table 2; Figure 5). VFA concentrations were also higher for urea than for nitrate, but were increased with a curvilinear trend by 35% overall on nitrate and by 54% on urea, as the TLM was increased from zero to 100% of the substrate (Table 2; Figure 6).
Table 2. Mean values of pH, ammonia and VFA in each level of Tithonia leaves after incubation |
|||||||||||
|
Levels of Tithonia leaves |
|
NPN source |
|
|
||||||
|
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
100 |
Prob. |
K-nitrate |
Urea |
SEM |
Prob. |
pH |
6.59 |
6.60 |
6.64 |
6.60 |
6.59 |
6.60 |
0.268 |
6.60 |
6.61 |
0.009 |
0.341 |
Ammonia, mg/100 ml |
11.1 |
11.7 |
11.5 |
11.7 |
12.3 |
11.7 |
0.094 |
10.5 |
12.8 |
0.166 |
<0.001 |
VFA, mg/100ml |
63.8 |
78.1 |
85.9 |
90.6 |
93.8 |
92.5 |
<0.001 |
77.9 |
90.3 |
0.757 |
<0.001 |
Figure 5. Effect of proportion of Tithonia leaf meal replacing sugar cane stalk on ammonia concentration with K-nitrate or urea as NPN source |
Figure 6. Effect of proportion of Tithonia leaves replacing sugar cane stalk on volatile fatty acid concentration with K-nitrate or urea as NPN source |
The effect of the rumen fermentable carbohydrate source (derinded sugar cane) in increasing methane production from TLM was the opposite of the decrease in methane production when cassava root meal was added to sweet potato vines and water spinach (Ho Quang Do et al 2012). Both sweet potato vines and water spinach have high levels of soluble protein, similar to that in TLM. The difference between TLM and sweet potato vines and water spinach is that the latter two forages do not possess anti-nutritional or antimicrobial compounds, in contrast with Tithonia leaves which are apparently rich in a range of such compounds according to the following reports [Extracts from Tithonia plant parts protect crops from termites (Adoyo et al 1997), contain chemicals that inhibit plant growth (Baruah et al 1978; Tongma et al 1997), control insects (Carino and Rejestes 1982; Dutta et al 1993), have medicinal value for treatment of hepatitis (Lin et al 1993; Kuo and Chen 1997), control amoebic dysentery (Tona et al 1998) and have broad spectrum activity against a range of bacteria associated with wound infections (Ogunfolakan et al 2010)].
It can be expected therefore that inclusion of Tithonia foliage in the diet of ruminants will lead to a decrease in enteric methane emissions. This supposition needs to be verified by experiments directly comparing Tithonea leaves with water spinach foliage and/or sweet potato vines in substrates in which the energy component is either sugar cane or cassava root meal.
In an in vitro system, gas production, methane percentage in the gas, percent of substrate solubilized, and methane produced per unit substrate solubilized, were lower for nitrate than for urea at all levels of Tithonia leaf meal replacing derinded sugar cane in the substrate.
When urea was the NPN source the level of Tithonia leaf meal did not affect gas production, but reduced it when nitrate was the source of NPN.
The methane percentage in the gas, percent of substrate solubilized and methane produced per unit substrate solubilized, decreased linearly for both urea and nitrate with increasing levels of Tithonia leaf meal.
It is concluded that inclusion of Tithonia foliage in the diet of ruminants will probably lead to a decrease in enteric methane emissions.
The authors express gratitude to the MEKARN project, supported by Sida, for financial support for this research. Special thanks are given to Mr Sengsouly Phongphanith and Mr Aloun Ounalom who provided valuable help in the laboratory. We also acknowledge the Souphanouvong University, Faculty of Agriculture and Forest Resources, Department of Animal Science, for providing infrastructure support.
References
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230
Carino M A and Rejestes B M 1982 Isolation and characterization of the insecticidal fraction from leaf extracts of Tithonia diversifolia. Annals of Tropical Research 4: 1–11
Dutta P, Chaudhuri R P and Sharma R P 1993 Insect feeding deterrents from Tithonia diversi-folia (Hemsl) Gray. Journal of Enviornmental Biology 14: 27–33
Ho Quang Do, Tran Duy Khoa, Trinh Phuc Hao, Preston T R and Leng R A 2012 Protein solubility in different forages and methane production in an in vitro incubation. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #155. Retrieved , from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/9/hqdo24158.htm
Inthapanya S, Preston T R and Leng R A 2011 Mitigating methane production from ruminants; effect of calcium nitrate as modifier of the fermentation in an in vitro incubation using cassava root as the energy source and leaves of cassava or Mimosa pigra as source of protein. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 23, Article #21. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/2/sang23021.htm
Jama B, Palm C A, Buresh R J, Niang A, Gachengo C, Nziguheba G and Amadalo B 2000 Tithonia diversifolia as a green manure for soil fertility improvement in western Kenya: A review. Agroforestry Systems. pp 201-221
Kuo Y H and Chen C H 1997 Diversifolol, a novel rearranged eduesmane sesquiterpene from the leaves of Tithonia diversifolia. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 45: 1223–1224
Lin C C, Lin M L and Lin J M 1993 The antiinflammatory and liver protective effect of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) Gray and Dicliptera chinensis Juss. extracts in rats. Phytotherapy Research 7: 305–309
Lijzenga M 1998 Maize response to NPK in relation to soil fertility indices in western Kenya. MSc thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Ly J and Nguyen Van Lai 1997 Laboratory manual. http://mekarn.org/home/training/courses/manual-laboratory-2
Mahecha Liliana y Rosales M 2005 Valor Nutricional del Follaje de Botón de Oro Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) Gray, en la Producción Animal en el Trópico. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 17, Article No. 100. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/9/mahe17100.htm
Minitab 2000 Minitab Software Release 13.2
Ogunfolakan O, Kolawole O S and Olowe A O 2010 In vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Tithonia diversifolia Leaf Extracts on Bacterial Isolates from Wound Infections from a Nigerian Hospital. Research Journal of Medical Sciences, 4: 305-308.
Pathoummalangsy K and Preston T R 2008 Effects of supplementation with rumen fermentable carbohydrate and sources of 'bypass' protein on feed intake, digestibility and N retention in growing goats fed a basal diet of foliage of Tithonia diversifolia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 20, supplement. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/kham20076.htm
Preston T R and Leng R A 1987 Matching Livestock Systems to Available Resources in the Tropics and Subtropics. Penambul Books Australia. Web version http://www.utafoundation. org/ P&L/preston&leng.htm
Sanchez P 2001 The climate change-soil fertility-food security Nexux. In: Sustainable food security for all by 2020. Sept 4-6 2000 Bonn, Germany. http://www.ifpri.org/2020conference/pdf/summary_sanchez.pdf
Sao N V, Mui N T and Binh Đ V 2010 Biomass production of Tithonia diversifolia (Wild Sunflower), soil improvement on sloping land and use as high protein foliage for feeding goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #151. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/8/sao22151.htm
Siton Kongvongxay 2012 Effect of foliages rich in bypass protein on apparent digestibility, growth and methane emission in goats. http://www.mekarn.org/msc2010-12/sitone.pdf
Tona L, Kambu K, Ngimbi N, Cimanga K and Vlietinck A J 1998 Antiamoebic and phytochemical screening of some Congolese medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 61: 57–65
Tilley J M A and Terry R A 1963 A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18 : 104.
Vargas J E 1994 Caracterización de recursos forrajeros disponibles en tres agroecosistemas del Valle del Cauca. En: Memorias II Seminario Internacional Desarrollo sostenible de Sistemas Agrarios, Maestría en Sistemas Sostenibles de Producción Animal en los Trópicos. Cali. P 135-149.
Vu Thi Thu Hang, Do Chien Thang, Luu Thi Nhan 2012 Using extract of Tithonia diversifolia leaves to control Scabies in rabbits.