This study was conducted to determine effects of Eucalyptus leaf powder (ELP) supplementation on characteristics of ruminal fermentation of a 40:60 mixture of rice straw and concentrate, using the in vitro gas production technique. Rumen fluid was collected from two rumen fistulated beef cattle with 215 ± 15 kg of body weight. The substrates were supplemented with ELP at levels of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6%. The volume of gas was recorded after incubation periods of 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. In vitro true digestibility (IVTD) was determined after 12, 24 and 48h of incubation. Methane production was measured after 48 h of incubation using the indirect method of carbon dioxide absorption as well as directly by gas chromotography.
The cumulative gas production and the rate of gas production, as well as the in vitro digestibiliity, were reduced as the level of ELP was increased. The methane content of the gas decreased linearly with level of added ELP to a recorded maximum of 28% with addition of 6% ELP. The indirect measurement of methane by absorption of carbon dioxide gave values about 10% higher than the values recorded by gas chromotography; however, the trends with increasing levels of ELP were almost identical for the two methods.ion.
Methane is one of the major products of anaerobic fermentation of feeds in the rumen. Reducing CH4 production is an important goal of ruminant nutritionists as it represents a significant loss of energy for the host animal and contributes to global warming (Moss et al 2000). Many attempts have been made to depress rumen methanogenesis through the use of feed additives such as ionophores, halogen compounds, unsaturated fatty acids and organic acids.
Currently numerous studies have attempted to exploit plant secondary metabolites as natural feed additives to improve the efficiency of rumen fermentation such as enhancing protein metabolism and decreasing methane production (McIntosh et al 2003). Recently, many reviews have been published on plant extracts such as saponins, tannins and essential oils (EOs) as rumen modifiers (Calsamiglia et al 2007). Plant derived EOs may be a useful means to improve efficiency of nutrient utilization in ruminants and reduce the impact of their production on the environment (Benchaar et al 2008). The Eucalyptus is a tall evergreen tree with many species available and these can be found in many parts of the world, which produce a wide variety of oil. Akin et al (2010) reported that the major components of Eucalyptus camaldulensis oil were ethanone (13.73%), eucalyptol (25.36%) and caryophyllene (11.55%). Eucalyptol (1.8- cineole) is the main active ingredient in oils from E. Camaldulensis (Sallam et al 2009a). Recently, in vitro studies have demonstrated that EOs or their components have the potential to favorably alter rumen metabolism (Busquet et al 2006). However, there are few experimental data on effects of the Eucalyptus leaf powder on rumen digestion and rumen fermentation.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate effects of different levels of E camaldulensis) leaf powder (ELP) supplementation on feed digestibility and methane production in ruminants by using in vitro gas technique.
The study was carried out at the Animal Feed Station belonging to National Institute of Animal Sciences. The station is located in the Red River Delta at 105o47’E longitude and 21o05’N latitude, with a mean altitude of 2 m above sea level. The climate is tropical monsoon with wet season between April and November and dry season from December to March.
This study was conducted using an in vitro gas technique with different incubation times. The treatments in a completely randomized design (CRD) were seven levels of Eucalyptus meal powder: ELP0=0 (control); ELP1= 1%, ELP2=2%, ELP3= 3%, ELP4= 4%, ELP5= 5% and ELP6= 6% added to a basal substrate containing ratio of 40:60 roughage (rice straw) and concentrate (14% crude protein). Eucalyptus powder was prepared by drying fresh Eucalyptus leaves at 60°C. Substrate and dried Eucalyptus leaves were milled to pass through a 1mm screen prior to mixing the ELP with the rest of the substrate at the pre-determined levels. Samples (200 mg of substrate mixture DM) were put into 100ml syringes for the incubations. The ingredients of the substrate and their chemical composition are shown in Table 1.
Two, male 3-year-old, rumen fistulated, Laisind cattle with initial BW of 215 ± 15 kg were used as rumen fluid donors. They were fed the same roughage: concentrate mixture as was used in the incubations. dietary ingrediets as those used in the incubations. The rumen liquor was obtained from each animal before the morning feeding. It was filtered through four layers of cheese cloth into pre-warmed thermos flasks. Preparation of artificial saliva was done according to the procedure detailed in Menke and Steingass (1988). The artificial saliva and rumen fluid were mixed in a 2:1 ratio to prepare the inoculum. The syringes with the mixtures of substrates were prewarmed in a water bath at 39°C for 1 hour before adding 30 ml of rumen inoculum mixture to each one. During the incubation, the gas production was recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96h. Cumulative gas production data were fitted to the model of Ærskov and McDonald (1979) as follows:
y = a + b(1-e(-ct))
Where a = the gas production from the immediately soluble fraction, b = the gas production from the insoluble fraction, c = the gas production rate constant for the insoluble fraction (b), t = incubation time, (a+b) = the potential extent of gas production. y = gas produced at time “t”.
Dry mater digestibility and organic matter digestibility were estimated at 12, 24, 48 hours after fermentation. The residual solutions were filtered by gravity, using Whatman No 4 filter paper, and the residues dried at 105°C for 24 h, for the determination of IVDMD. The dry residues were incinerated at 550°C for measuring in vitro OM disappearance (IVOMD).
Two methods were compared.
Immediately after the incubation at 48h, 1ml of the gas phase was sampled from the syringe and analysed for methane by gas chromatography (GC17A, Detector FID) according to Van Nevel et al (1970).
Immediately after removal of the syringes from the water bath, 4 ml of 10M NaOH were introduced using a 5 ml capacity syringe. The content was inserted into the silicon tube, which was fastened to the 100 ml capacity syringe. The clip was then opened while the NaOH was gradually released. The content was agitated while the plunger began to shift position to occupy the vacuum created by the absorption of CO2. The volume of methane was read on the calibrated body of the syringe. To determine the actual gas produced, the average of the volume of gas produced from the blanks was deducted from the volume of gas produced per sample (Demeyer 1988; Fievez et al 2005).
Data were analyzed by using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS (1998). The model was
Yij = µ + Ti + εij,
where Yij is the observed treatment i, for replication j; µ the overall mean; Ti the mean of each treatment; and εij the residual effect. Multiple comparisons among treatment means were performed by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DMRT) (Steel and Torrie 1980).
The composition of the concentrate and the analysis of the ingredients used in the substrates are in Table 1. The ELP was low in crude protein and relatively high in NDF and ADF, the values being similar to those reported by Sobhy et al (2010) and Sallam et al (2010).
Table 1: Ingredient and chemical composition of experimental diets |
|||
|
Ratio |
||
Concentrates |
Rice Straw |
ELP |
|
Ingredients |
--------------- % DM-------------- |
||
Cassava chip |
58 |
|
|
Rice bran |
11 |
|
|
Corn meal |
13 |
|
|
Palm meal |
15 |
|
|
Urea |
3 |
|
|
DM, % |
93.4 |
95.8 |
96.7 |
|
--------------% DM----------------- |
||
OM |
94.2 |
83.5 |
91.5 |
Ash |
5.8 |
16.5 |
8.5 |
CP |
14 |
3.8 |
7.5 |
NDF |
26.7 |
75.6 |
55.8 |
ADF |
18.5 |
47.2 |
42.5 |
ELP= Eucalyptus leaf powder; DM = dry matter, OM = organic matter, CP = crude protein, NDF = neutral-detergent fiber, ADF = acid-detergent fiber. |
The cumulative gas production (a+b) and the rate of production (c) were reduced as the level of ELP was increased (Table 1; Figure 1). According to Sallam et al (2009a), eucalyptus oils decreased gas production with increasing level of oil.
Table 2: The effects of ELP on gas kinetics |
||||||||
Gas kinetic |
Fermentation kinetic values |
SEM |
||||||
ELP0 |
ELP1 |
ELP2 |
ELP3 |
ELP4 |
ELP5 |
ELP6 |
||
a |
-7.47bc |
-7.6bc |
-9.20d |
-5.37ab |
-4.88a |
-8.41cd |
-6.37ab |
0.497 |
b |
64.92a |
64.75a |
63.06ab |
59.56bc |
57.51cd |
58.81bcd |
54.58d |
1.35 |
c |
0.057a |
0.055ab |
0.053b |
0.052b |
0.046cd |
0.046c |
0.044d |
0.001 |
a+b |
57.44a |
57.13a |
53.85ab |
54.19ab |
52.62b |
50.39bc |
48.21c |
1.28 |
Gas 96 h (ml/200mg substrate) |
58.15a |
57.74a |
54.45ab |
54.80ab |
51.80bc |
49.26cd |
47.16d |
1.28 |
a-d Values in the same row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05). |
|
Figure 1: Effect of ELP on cumulative gas production at different time of incubation |
The in vitro digestibility of DM and OM decreased as the level of ELP was increased (Tables 3 and 4; Figures 2 and 3). Similar results were reported by Sallam et al (2009a) in in vitro experiments with Eucalyptus oil supplementation. Related results were presented by Soltan (2009) who observed that essential oil mixtures reduced DM and OM digestibility, and roughage intake, in growing heifers. Oh et al (1967) and Nagy and Tengerdy (1968) observed that Eucalyptus oil markedly inhibited activity of ruminal bacteria in vitro. Russell and Strobel (1989) found that supplementation with Eucalyptus oil led to the inhibition of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria, such as Cellulotytic ruminococci and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. Eucalyptus leaves contain tannins, flavonoids and volatile oils. Inhibitory interactions between terpenes, as well as other plant secondary compounds, may inhibit the activity of rumen protozoa and methanogenic bacteria (Sallam et al 2009b).
Table 3: Effect of ELP on IVDMD at 12, 24, 48h of incubation |
||||||||
Incubation time (h) |
Treatments |
SEM |
||||||
ELP0 |
ELP1 |
ELP2 |
ELP3 |
ELP4 |
ELP5 |
ELP6 |
||
12 |
58.2ab |
59.6a |
53.4ab |
54.7ab |
53.6ab |
53.0ab |
51.0b |
1.99 |
24 |
64.4a |
64.9a |
57.9b |
58.9b |
55.0bc |
55.5bc |
52.2c |
1.47 |
48 |
66.1a |
65.7a |
63.2ab |
63.5ab |
61.3ab |
57.1bc |
54.5c |
1.81 |
a-d Values in the same row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05). |
|
Figure 2: Effect of ELP on DM digestibility at different time of incubation |
Table 4: Effect of ELP on IVOMD at 12, 24, 48h of incubation |
||||||||
Incubation time (h) |
Treatments |
SEM |
||||||
ELP0 |
ELP1 |
ELP2 |
ELP3 |
ELP4 |
ELP5 |
ELP6 |
||
12 |
55.8a |
53.4ab |
55.8a |
52.4ab |
49.6bc |
47.0c |
46.7c |
1.4 |
24 |
66.7a |
61.8ab |
61.8ab |
57.7bc |
53.6dc |
52.5dc |
51.0d |
1.54 |
48 |
68.3a |
67.9a |
61.9b |
62.9b |
57.4c |
54.2c |
53.6c |
1.26 |
a-dValues in the same row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05). |
|
Figure 3: Effect of ELP on DM digestibility at different time of incubation |
The methane content of the gas decreased linearly with level of added Eucalyptus leaf meal (Table 5; Figure 4). One component of Eucalyptus oil - p-cymene - decreased methane by 29% at a concentration of 20 mg/liter according to Chaves et al (2008). Sallam et al (2009a) found that eucalyptus oils inhibited methane production by 29.6 - 90.3 % and that protozoal numbers were also decreased. Similar findings were reported by Kumar et al (2009).
The indirect measurement of methane by absoirption of carbon dioxide gave values about 10% higher than the values recorded by gas chromotography; however, the trends with increasing levels of ELP were almost identical for the two methods which indicates that the absorption method could be used for comparative purposes, when direct measurement of methane is not possible through lackof appropriate equipment.
Table 5. Effect of ELP on methane production at 48h of incubation |
||||||||
Method |
Methane content in gas (%) |
SEM |
||||||
ELP0 |
ELP1 |
ELP2 |
ELP3 |
ELP4 |
ELP5 |
ELP6 |
||
Naxide OH |
40.75a |
39.45a |
36.75ab |
36.95ab |
34.25abc |
30.95bc |
29.25c |
1.86 |
GC |
37.32a |
35.62ab |
33.83b |
33.65b |
30.41c |
27.76d |
26.65d |
0.57 |
a-dValues in the same row with different superscripts differ (P<0.05). |
|
Figure 4: Comparison of gas chromotography and carbon dioxide absorption as methods for measurement of methane |
Increasing levels of Eucalyptus leaf meal in the range 0 to 6% in an in vitro incubation of a 40:60 roughage: concentrate substrate resulted in a linear reduction in rate of methane production reaching 28% at the 6% level of ELM.
Indirect measuring of methane percentage in fermentation gas by absorption of carbon dioxide with sodium hydroxide over-estimated by 10% the level determined by gas chromotography, but relative trends in response to added ELM were similar for the two methods.
The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the MEKARN program financed by the Sida-SAREC project for providing the opportunity and the budget to do the research; and to the National Institute of Animal Sciences for providing research infrastructure support.
Akin M, Aktumsek A
and Nostro A 2010
Antibacterial activity and composition of the essential oils of Eucalyptus
Camaldulensis Dehn. and Myrtus communis L. growing in Northern Cyprus.
African Journal of
Biotechnology.
9: 531-535.
Benchaar C, Calsamiglia S, Chaves A V, Fraser G R, Colombatto D, McAllister T A and Beauchemin K A 2008 A review of plant-derived essential oils in ruminant nutrition and production. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 145: 209-228
Busquet M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A and Kamel C 2006 Plant extracts affect in vitro rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science. 89: 761-771.
Calsamiglia S,
Castillejos L, Mart´ın-Tereso J and Ter Wijlen H 2007
In vitro evaluation of effects of ten essential oils at three doses on
ruminal fermentation of high concentrate feedlot-type diets.
Animal Feed Science and Technology.
145: 259-270.
Chaves A V, He M L, Yang W Z, Hristov A N and McAllister T A 2008 Effects of essential oils on proteolytic, deaminative and methanogenic activities of mixed ruminal bacteria. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 89: 97-104.
Demeyer D, De Meulemeester M, De Graeve K and Gupta B W 1988 Effect of fungal treatment on nutritive value of straw. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 53, 1811–1819.
Fievez V, Babayemi O J and Demeyer D 2005 Estimation of direct and indirect gas production in syringes: a tool to estimate short chain fatty acid production requiring minimal laboratory facilities. Animal Feed Science and Technology: 123 – 124: 197-210.
Kumar R, Kamra D N, Agrawal N and Chaudhary L C 2009 Effect of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) oil on in vitro methanogenesis and fermentation of feed with buffalo rumen liquor. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology. 9: 237-243.
McIntosh F M, Williams P, Losa R, Wallace R J, Beever D A and Newbold C J 2003 Effects of essential oils on ruminal microorganisms and their protein metabolism. Applied and Environmental Microbiology Journal. 69: 5011-5014
Menke K H and Steingass H 1988 Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development (SAUS). 28: 7-55.
Moss A R, Jouany J P and Newbold J 2000 Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zootech. 49: 231-253
Nagy J G and Tengerdy R P 1968 Antibacterial action of essential oils of Artemisia as an ecological factor. II. Antibacterial action of the volatile oils of Artemisia tridentata (big sagebrush) on bacteria from the rumen of mule deer. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 16:441–444.
Oh H K, Sakai T, Jones M B and Longhurst W M 1967 Effect of various essential oils isolated from Douglas fir needles upon sheep and deer rumen microbial activity. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 15:777–784.
Ærskov E R and
McDonald I 1979
The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation
measurements weighted according to rate of passage.
The Journal of
Agricultural Science.
92: 499–503.
Russell J B and Strobel H J 1989 Effect of Ionophores on ruminal fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology Journal. 55: 1-6.
Salem A Z M, Salem M Z M, El-Adawy M M and Robinson P H 2006 Nutritive evaluations of some browse tree foliages during the dry season: Secondary compounds, feed intake and in vivo digestibility in sheep and goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 127: 251-267.
Sallam S M A, Nasser M E A, Araujo R C and Abdalla A L 2009a Methane emission in vivo by sheep consuming diet with different levels of eucalyptus essential oil. Pp 210-211 in Proc. FAO/IAEA Int. Symp. On sustainable improvement of animal production and health, Vienna, Austria.
Sallam S M A, Bueno I C S, Brigide P, Godoy P B, Vitti D M S S and Abdalla A L 2009b Efficacy of eucalyptus oil on in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane production. Options Mediterraneennes - Nutritional and foraging ecology of sheep and goats. A / no. 85: pp. 267-272.
Sallam S M A, Bueno I C S, Nasser M E A and Abdalla A L 2010 Effect of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus Citriodora) fresh or residue leaves on methane emission in vitro. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 9: 58.
SAS Institute Inc. 1998. SAS/STAT User’s Guid 6. 12th ed. SAS Institue Inc., Cary, Nort Carolina.
Sobhy M, Sallam A, Ives C and Bueno S 2010 Effect of Eucalyptus (Citriodora) fresh or residue leaves on methane emission in vitro. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 9: 58.
Soltan M A 2009 Effect of Essential Oils Supplementation on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Health Condition of Holstein Male Calves During Pre- and Post-Weaning Periods. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 8 (5): 642-652
Steel R G D and Torrie J H 1980 Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, NY, USA.
Van Nevel C J, Demeyer D I, Henderickx H K and Martin J A 1970 A simple method for the simultaneous determination of gas production and volatile fatty acid concentration in the rumen. Zeitschr. Tierphys. Tierern¨ahr. Futtermittelk. 26, 91–100.