Back to contents |
The study was conducted to determine the effect of phytase and carbohydrase supplementation to diets based on rice bran on the digestibility of dietary components and phosphorus excretion of growing pigs. The basal diet was composed of maize meal, fish meal, soybean meal and rice bran, in which rice bran was considered as feed rich in fibre and phosphorus. The basal diet was calculated to meet requirement of growing pigs according to NRC (1998). Four diets including a basal diet (diet I), a basal diet supplemented with phytase (diet II), a basal diet supplemented with carbohydrate enzyme (diet III), and a basal diet supplemented with phytase plus carbohydrate enzyme (diet IV). Four castrated male pigs (Landrace x Yorkshire) with the initial body weight of 33 ± 1 kg were designed according to a 4x4 Latin square. The experimental period lasted 12 days, the first 7 days for adaptation to the diet and last 5 days for fecal and urine collection.
The results show that the diets had no impact on the feed intake (P>0.05). There were significant differences in the digestibility of DM, OM, CF, NDF and P among diets (P<0.05), exception of CP digestibility (P>0.05). The diets supplemented phytase had higher P retention and lower total P excretion than the diets without phytase supplementation (P>0.05). The enzyme supplementation to diets (diet II, III and IV) had lower N excretion than diet without enzyme supplementation (P<0.05). The N retention was different significantly among the diets (P<0.05), with the highest value for the diet supplemented both phytase and carborhydrase enzyme. In conclusion, enzyme supplementation to the diets improved the digestibility of dietary components and P and N retention.
In general, cereals ordinarily used in swine feeds have adequate contents of total phosphorus: 0.20-0.84% for maize, 0.24-0.77% for full fat soybean, 0.84-1.65% for rice bran (Chinh et al 2001). In addition, abundant in many feed ingredients of plant origin, phytate is one of the most important anti-nutritional factors for non-ruminant animals. However, the limited ability of pigs to use phytate-P poses a problem. This relates to the ability of phytate to form complexes with other dietary nutrients, such as minerals, proteins, free AA, and starch (Selle et al 2000). Phytase catalyzes the removal of orthophosphate groups from phytate (Maga 1982), allowing the bound nutrients to be released for utilization. The activity of intrinsic phytase in diets for pigs and activity of endogenous phytase in the digestive tract are not sufficient for efficient hydrolysis of phytate (Pointillart et al 1987; Cromwell et al 1993). Therefore, when rations are formulated for these animals, it is necessary to add inorganic phosphorus to meet their nutritional requirements, leading to increase environmental pollution and diet costs.
The supplementation of phytase to swine diets can improve the digestibility and retention of P in pigs (Simons et al 1990; Lei et al 1993a, b) and also improved the apparent ileal digestibilities (AID) of CP and some of the AA (Mroz et al 1994; Kemme et al 1999). As a consequence, phytase can reduce phosphorus, nitrogen and sulfur excretion, decreasing environmental pollution. A report focused on reducing or eliminating the inorganic phosphorus sources in swine feeds formulated with corn and soybean bran have been found that phosphorus excretion in the feces can be reduced by about 50% with the use of phytase (Cromwell et al 1995). The optimum supplementation rate appears to be 500FTU/kg diet, although a maximum response can be achieved at 1000FTU/kg diet (Canh 1995). Recently, Wenk et al (1993) investigated the effects of the use of carbohydrate and phytase in a combination with pig, and found that both had a more or less pronounced effect on the digestibility of organic matter, energy, and N as well as P and zinc. However, they could not find any favorable effect of a combination of carbohydrate with the phytase concerning growth performance and digestibility of the nutrients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the digestibility of dietary components and phosphorus excretion of growing pigs given diets based on rice bran with phytase supplementation.
Materials and methods
Location and climate of the study site
The study was carried out at the Station of Animal Feed Trial (SAFT) belonging to National Institute of Animal Sciences.
Experimental feeds
The basal diet was based on maize meal, fish meal, soybean
meal, soybean oil, rice bran, in which rice bran was considered as feed rich in
fibre and phosphorus (Table 1). The basal diet were calculated to contain
metabolizable energy, crude protein and essential amino acids to meet
requirements of growing pigs according to NRC (1998), and was offered in mash
form (Table 2). Four diets including a basal diet (CTL), a basal diet
supplemented with phytase (PHY), a basal diet supplemented with carbohydrase
enzyme (CAR), a basal diet supplemented with phytase plus carbohydrase enzyme (PHY-CAR).
The phytase and carbohydrase enzyme were supplied by BIOMIN Vietnam.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 2. Ingredient and chemical compositions in the basal diet |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ingredient composition (% on air-dry basis) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maize meal |
33.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Soy bean cake |
22.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fish meal |
5.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rice bran |
35.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Soy oil |
2.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minerals |
2.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premix-Vitamin |
0.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Methionine |
0.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salt |
0.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical composition (% on DM basis) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dry matter |
90.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CP |
17.7 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CF |
12.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NDF |
29.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OM |
90.6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P |
0.7 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DM= Dry matter, CP = Crude protein, OM = Organic matter, CF = Crude fiber, NDF = Neutral detergent fiber, P = phosphorus |
Four castrated male pigs (Landrace x Yorkshire) at around 2.5 months of age were arranged according to 4 x 4 Latin squares. All the pigs were vaccinated against pasteurellosis and hog cholera, and be kept individually in metabolism cages and given free access to drinking water through nipple drinkers. The metabolism cages were placed indoors, with maximum temperatures ranging from 25oC to 33oC
The experiment was included three periods. Each period was last 12 days, of which 7 days was for adaptation and 5 days for fecal collection. The pigs were fed ad libitum in the adaptation periods and then in the collection periods were restricted to 80% of the mean intake in the previous adaptation period. During both adaptation and collection, the feed was given in equal amounts twice per day at 8:00 and 16:00 hours and in the adaptation periods, remaining feed was removed and weighed and fresh feed was added. Feces and urine were collected twice daily after each meal. Ten percent of the total feces and urine were sampled at each collection time and stored in a refrigerator at 4oC. At the end of each collection period, samples of feces and urine were pooled and taken for analysis.
Urine samples were analyzed for total nitrogen and phosphorus in fresh form. Feed and faces were dried at 60oC for 48 h and ground to pass through a 1-mm sieve before analysis. The samples were analyzed ash, CP (N x 6.25), phosphorus according to standard AOAC (1990) methods. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was analyzed using method of Goering and Van Soest (1991).
Statistical analyses were performed using the GLM procedure of SAS (1998). Data were analyzed using the model Yijk=μ+Ti+Aj+Pk+εijk where Yijk, observation from animal, j, receiving diet I, in period k; μ, the overall mean; Ti, effect of diets; Aj, the effect of animal (j = 1, 2, 3 and 4); Pk, the effect of period (k = 1, 2, 3 and 4); and εij, the residual effect. Difference between treatment means were determined by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DMRT) (Steel and Torrie, 1980) with P<0.05 were accepted as representing statistically significant differences.
In general, supplementation of phytase and carbohydrase enzyme did not affect on daily DM and nutrient intake (P>0.05) (Table 3). Regarding fecal characteristics, DM concentration in diets II was higher than that in the diets I, III and IV (P<0.05) due to the lower level of fecal fibre, which has a low water holding capacity (Eastwood 1973; Serena et al 2008). The fecal P concentration in the diets II and IV was lower than in the diet I and III, which supported that the diets supplemented phytase decreased the fecal P concentration.
Table 3. Feed intake and nutrient digestibility |
|||||
Items |
CTL |
PHY |
CAR |
PHY-CAR |
SEM |
Intake (g/day) |
|||||
DM |
1148 |
1103 |
1126 |
1103 |
21.6 |
CP |
204 |
196 |
200 |
196 |
3.8 |
OM |
1040 |
1000 |
1020 |
1000 |
19.5 |
CF |
142 |
136 |
139 |
136 |
2.7 |
NDF |
339 |
326 |
333 |
326 |
6.4 |
P |
7.8 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
7.5 |
0.15 |
N |
32.6 |
31.3 |
31.9 |
31.3 |
0.61 |
Fecal characteristics (% DM) |
|||||
DM |
44.6a |
48.2b |
44.4a |
44.8a |
0.75 |
CP |
14.0a |
14.2a |
15.3b |
15.6b |
0.20 |
OM |
82.4a |
75.6b |
80.8c |
81.0c |
0.27 |
CF |
28.3a |
29.6ab |
30.5b |
30.4b |
0.40 |
NDF |
43.1a |
42.6ab |
42.2b |
42.2b |
0.20 |
P |
1.4a |
1.0b |
1.5c |
1.1b |
0.04 |
N |
2.24a |
2.26a |
2.5b |
2.5b |
0.03 |
Digestion coefficient, % |
|||||
DM |
73.5a |
74.5a |
76.3b |
76.7b |
0.31 |
CP |
79.0 |
79.6 |
79.6 |
79.5 |
0.19 |
OM |
75.9a |
78.7b |
78.9b |
79.2b |
0.28 |
CF |
38.0a |
38.8a |
41.5b |
42.8c |
0.57 |
NDF |
42.1a |
43.8a |
46.3b |
46.7b |
0.49 |
P |
46.5a |
61.6b |
47.4a |
64.1b |
1.58 |
a, b, c Values within the row without common superscript are different at P<0.05 |
As shown in table 3, the digestibility of CP was not
different among diets (P>0.05). As was suggested by Liao et al (2005) phytase
supplementation to diets for growing pigs did not improve the digestibility of
CP and amino acids. Adeola and Sands (2003) theorized that the formation of
ternary complexes of phytase and protein during intestinal passage may have a
negative effect on protease activity and on the digestibility of CP.
Pig fed the diets supplemented cabohydrase or a combination of phytase and
cabohydrase enzyme had a positive effects on the digestibility of DM, OM, CF,
NDF and P (P<0.05). The positive effects may have been due to disruption of
intact cell walls and release of entrapped nutrients or due to the changes in
the physical properties of non-starch polysaccharides, such as viscosity and
water holding capacity, and/or changes in the composition and content of
bacteria in the small and large intestine (Jensen et al 1998; O’Connell et al
2005). The current results are in agreement with studies by Ngoc et al (2011)
and Len et al (2009). However, other studies (Jensen et al 1998; Högberg and
Lindberg 2004) have reported no effect of enzyme supplementation (β-glucanase)
on the digestibility of dietary components in pigs fed cereal-based diets.
However, in the current study, the digestibility of DM, CF and NDF was not
enhanced when pig fed diet with phytase addition (P>0.05), except for
digestibility of OM and P (P<0.05) (Table 3). A study by Woyengo et al (2008)
showed that phytase at 250 FTU/kg increased the digestibility of P by 51% at 20
kg of body weight or by 54% at 60 kg of body weight.
Table 4 shows that the daily excretion of fecal N and P or urinary N, in contrast to the daily excretion of urinary P (P>0.05), were influenced by the diets (P<0.05). Fecal daily phosphorus excretion was higher for the diets II and IV than for diets I and III, which is suggested that pigs fed diets with phytase supplementation, decreased fecal P excretion. The daily fecal N excretion was decreased when pigs fed diet with a combination enzyme addition, this can be due to the amount of fecal excretion was reduced. Moreover, the decrease in fecal N excretion was most likely associated with increased bacterial protein output (Canh et al 1998) because of the fermentation of dietary fiber components when diet supplemented a combination enzyme.
The retention of phosphorus increased (P<0.05) for the pigs fed diets with phytase supplementation (Table 4). Some researchers showed that diets supplemented phytase can reduce phosphorus excretion and increase P retention (Kornegay et al 1996, Perney et al 1993, Emiola et al 2009). Cromwell et al (1993) reported that fecal phosphorus excretion of pigs was reduced 34-54%, by adding phytase in maize-soyabean meal diets. Another study pointed out that the combination of phytase and xylanase was improved retention of P (Olukosi et al 2007). However, in the present study individual phytase supplementation did not effect on N retetion, which was in line with earlier studies (Valaja et al 1998, Walz and Pallauf 2003, Johnston et al 2004). In contrast, some reports showed a positive effect of phytase supplementation both on N digestibility and N retention (Ketaren et al 1993, Mroz et al 1994, Sands et al 2001). The increase in P digestibility may have reduced limitation of P status on protein deposition, thereby reducing urinary N excretion.
Nitrogen retetion was enhanced when pigs fed diets with carbonhydrase or a combination of phytase and carbonhydrase enzyme (P<0.05). This can be explained that daily total N excretion was dcreased by supplementation of carbonhydrase or a combination of phytase and carbonhydrase enzyme.
Table 4. Effect of phytase and carbonhydrase enzyme supplementation on the P and N balance |
|||||
Items |
CTL |
PHY |
CAR |
PHY-CAR |
SEM |
Intake (g/day) |
|||||
P |
7.8 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
7.5 |
0.15 |
N |
32.6 |
31.3 |
31.9 |
31.3 |
0.61 |
Excretion (g/day) |
|||||
Fecal P |
4.2a |
2.9b |
4.0a |
2.7b |
0.07 |
Urinary P(x 10-2) |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.27 |
Total P |
4.2a |
2.9b |
4.0a |
2.7b |
0.07 |
Fecal N |
6.8a |
6.4b |
6.5ab |
6.4b |
0.11 |
Urinary N |
3.0a |
2.8b |
2.5c |
2.3c |
0.06 |
Total N |
9.8a |
9.1b |
9.0 b |
8.7b |
0.13 |
Excretion/intake (%) |
|||||
Fecal P |
53.5a |
38.4b |
52.6a |
35.9b |
1.58 |
Urinary P (x 10-2) |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
3.80 |
Total P |
53.6a |
38.4b |
52.6a |
35.9b |
1.60 |
Fecal N |
21.0 |
20.4 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
0.19 |
Urinary N |
9.3a |
8.9a |
7.6b |
7.5b |
0.25 |
Total N |
30.2a |
29.3ab |
28.3bc |
27.9c |
0.37 |
Retention (%) |
|||||
P |
46.4a |
61.6b |
47.4a |
64.1b |
1.58 |
N |
69. 8a |
70.7ab |
71.7bc |
72.1c |
0.37 |
a, b, c Values within the row without common superscript are different at P<0.05 |
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the MEKARN project financed by the SIDA-SAREC for providing the opportunity and the budget to do the research, Thanks are also given to the National Institute of Animal Sciences (NIAS) for providing infrastructure support and laboratory assistance.
Adeola O, and Sands J S 2003 Does supplemental dietary microbial phytase improve amino acid utilization? a perspective that it does not. Journal of Animal Science. 81 (E. Suppl. 2):E78–E85. http://jas.fass.org/content/81/14_suppl_2/E78.full.pdf+html
AOAC 1990 Official methods of analysis, 5th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA
Canh N 1995. Update on phytase in animal feeds. Feed mix. 3: 14-18
Canh T T, Sutton A L, Aarnink A J A, Verstegen M W A, Schrama J W and Bakker G C M 1998 Dietary carbohydrates alter the fecal composition and pH and the emission from slurry of growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1887-1895. http://jas.fass.org/content/76/7/1887.full.pdf+html
Chinh B V, Oanh B T, Ha N N, Viet T Q, Khang D T, Tinh N T, Binh L H, and Tao N H 2001 Chemical composition and nutritive value of animal feeds in Vietnam. Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Cromwell G L, Stahly T S, Coffey R D, Monegue H J and Randolph J H 1993 Efficacy of phytase in improving the bioavailability of phosphorus in soybean meal and corn-soybean meal diets for pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 71:1831–1840. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/71/7/1831.pdf
Cromwell G L, Coffey R D, Parker G R, Monegue H J and Randoph J H 1995 Efficacy of a recombinant-derived phytase in improving the bioavailability of phosphurus in corn-soybean meal diets for pigs. Journal of Animal Science.73:2000-2008. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/73/7/2000.pdf
Emiola A, Akinremi O, Slominski B and Nyachoti C M 2009 Nutrient utilization and manure P excretion in growing pigs fed corn-barley-soybean based diets supplemented with microbial phytase. Journal of Animal Science. 2009 Feb;80(1):19-26.
Eastwood M A 1973 Vegetables Fibre: its physical properties. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 32:137-143.
Goering H and Van Soest P 1991 Nutritional aspect of dietary fibres. Animal Feed Science and Technology 32:143-158
Högberg A and Lindberg J E 2004 Influence of cereal non-starch polysaccharides and enzyme supplementation on digestion site and gut environment in weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 116, 113–128.
Jensen M S, Bach Knudsen K E, Inborr J and Jakobsen K 1998 Effect of beta-glucanase supplementation on pancreatic enzyme activity and nutrient digestibility in piglets fed diets based on hulled and hulless barley varieties. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 72:329–345.
Johnston S L, Williams S B, Southern L L, Bidner T D, Bunting L D, Matthews J O and Olcott B M 2004 Effect of phytase addition and dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on plasma metabolites and ileal and totaltract nutrient digestibility in pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 82:705–714. http://jas.fass.org/content/82/3/705.full.pdf+html
Kemme P A, Jongbloed A W, Mroz Z and Beynen A C 1999 Digestibility of nutrients in growing-finishing pigs is affected by Aspergillus niger phytase, phytate, and lactic acid levels. 1. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids. Livestock Production Science. 58:107–117.
Ketaren P P, Batterham E S, Dettman E B and Farrell D J 1993 Effect of phytase supplementation on the digestibility and availability of phosphorus in soya-bean meal for grower pigs. British Journal of Nutrition. 70: 289–311.
Kornegay E T and Qian H 1996 Replacement of inorganic phosphorus by microbial phytase for young pigs fed on a maize-soyabean-meal diet. British Journal of Nutrition. 76(4):563-578. http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FBJN%2FBJN76_04%2FS0007114596001663a.pdf&code=3978a225e897bd93db323feb4fadd1e3
Lei X G, Ku P K, Miller E R and Yokoyama M T 1993a Supplementing corn-soybean meal diets with microbial phytase linearly improved phytate phosphorus utilization by weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 71:3359–3367. http://jas.fass.org/content/71/12/3359.full.pdf
Lei X G, Ku P K, Miller E R, Yokoyama M T and Ullrey D E 1993b Supplementing corn-soybean meal diets with microbial phytase maximizes phytate phosphorus utilization by weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 71:3368–3375. http://jas.fass.org/content/71/12/3368.full.pdf
Len N T, Ngoc T B, Ogle B, and Lindberg J E 2009 Ileal and total tract digestibility in local (Mong Cai) and exotic (Landrace x Yorkshire) piglets fed low and high fibre diets, with or without enzyme supplementation Livestock Science 126:73–79.
Liao F S, Sauer W C, Kies A K, Zhang Y C, Cervantes M, and He J M 2005 Effect of phytase supplementation to diets for weanling pigs on the digestibilities of crude protein, amino acids and energy. Journal of Animal Science. 83:625-633. http://jas.fass.org/content/83/3/625.full.pdf+html
Maga J A 1982 Phytate: Its chemistry, occurrence, food interactions, nutritional significance, and methods of analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 30:1–9.
Mroz Z, Jongbloed A W, and Kemme P A 1994 Apparent digestibility and retention of nutrients bound to phytate complexes as influenced by microbial phytase and feeding regimen in pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 72:126–132. http://jas.fass.org/content/72/1/126.full.pdf
Ngoc T T B, Len N T and Lindberg J E 2011 Influence of particle size and multi-enzyme supplementation of fibrous diets on total tract digestibility and performance of weaning (8–20 kg) and growing (20–40 kg) pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 169:86 – 95.
NRC 1998 Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th Ed. National Academies Press. Washington, DC.
O’Connell J M, Sweeney T, Callan J J O and Doherty J V 2005 The effect of cereal type and exogenous enzyme supplementation in pig diets on nutrient digestibility, intestinal microflora, volatile fatty acid concentration and manure ammonia emissions from finisher pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 81:357–364. http://www.bsas.org.uk/Publications/Animal_Science/2005/Volume_81_Part_3/357/
Olukosi O A, Sands J S and Adeola O 2007 Supplementation of carbohydrases or phytase individually or in combination to diets for weanling and growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 85:1702-1711. http://jas.fass.org/content/85/7/1702.full.pdf
Perney K M, Cantor A H and Straw M L 1993 The effect of dietary on growth performance and phosphorus utilization of broiler chicks. Poultry Science.72:2106 -2114.
Pointillart A, Fourdin A and Fountaine N 1987 Importance of cereal phytase activity for phytate phosphorus utilization by growing pigs fed diets containing triticale or corn. Journal of Nutrition. 117:907–913. http://jn.nutrition.org/content/117/5/907.long
Sands J S, Ragland D, Baxter C, Joern B C, Sauber T E and Adeola O 2001 Phosphorus bioavailability, growth performance, and nutrient balance in pigs fed high available phosphorus corn and phytase. Journal of Animal Science. 79:2134–2142. http://jas.fass.org/content/79/8/2134.full.pdf+html
SAS Institute Inc 1998 SAS/STAT User’s Guid 6. 12th ed. SAS Institue Inc, Cary, Nort Carolina.
Selle P H, Ravindran V, Caldwell R A and Bryden W L 2000 Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation. Nutrition research reviews. 13:255–278.
Serena A, Jørgensen H and Bach Knudsen K E 2008 Digestion of carbohydrates and utilization of energy in sows fed diets with contrasting levels and physicochemical properties of dietary fiber. Journal of Animal Science. 86:2208-2216. http://jas.fass.org/content/86/9/2208.full.pdf
Simons P C M, Versteegh H A J, Jongbloed A W, Kemme P A, Slump P, Bos K D, Wolters M G E, Beudeker R F and Verschoor G J 1990 Improvement of phosphorus availability by microbial phytase in broilers and pigs. British Journal of Nutrition. 64:525–540
Steel R G and Torrie J H 1980 Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co. New York, NY, USA.
Valaja J, Plaami S and Siljander-Rasi H 1998 Effect of microbial phytase on digestibility and utilization of phosphorus and protein in pigs fed wet barley protein with fibre. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 72: 221–233.
Walz P O and Pallauf J 2003 The effect of the combination of microbial phytase and amino acid supplementation of diets for finishing pigs on P and N excretion and carcass quality. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 57: 413–428.
Wenk C, Weiss E, Bee G and Messikommer R 1993 Interaction between a phytse and a carbohydrase in a pig diet. In: Enzymes in Animal nutrition (C. Wenk and M Bossinger ed.). pp. 160-164. http://www.ajas.info/Editor/manuscript/upload/12-7.pdf
Woyengo T A, Sands J S, Guenter W and Nyachoti C M 2008 Nutrient digestibility and performance responses of growing pigs fed phytase- and xylanase-supplemented wheat-based diets. Journal of Animal Science. 86:848-857. http://jas.fass.org/content/86/4/848.full.pdf+html