Back to contents    Citation of this paper

Effect of fresh cassava leaves and water spinach as protein sources in diets on N and amino acid digestibility in growing crossbred pigs 

Chhay Ty, Le Duc Ngoan*, Le Dinh Phung*

Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid),
Pras Teat village, Rolous commune, Kandal Stung district, Kandal province. PO Box 2423 Phnom Penh 3, Cambodia

chhay@celagrid.org
Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry, Vietnam, 102 Phung Hung Street. Hue city, Vietnam 

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to study effect of fresh cassava leaves and water spinach as protein sources in diets on N and amino acid digestibility in growing crossbred pigs. A balance experiment was arranged as a Latin-square design and included 4 male castrates of 50.3 (1.44) kg live weight. Four treatments included diets based on rice bran, broken rice and fishmeal (as the control diet – CTRL), and with fresh cassava leaves (FCL) or fresh water spinach (WS) or mixture of WS and FCL with ratio 1:1 (WSFCL) as the main protein source. Feed intake and nutrient digestibility were measured.

The control diet had higher feed intake than diets with fresh cassava leave, water spinach and mixture of fresh cassava leave and water spinach as the main protein source. Fresh water spinach was more palatable than the cassava leaves as reflected in higher total dry matter intake but not differences in proportion of the diet (26.7% for fresh cassava leaves and 26% for fresh water spinach and 26.3% for fresh cassava leave mix with water spinach). Digestibility of DM, OM, N, CF, NDF and essential amino acid in WS diet was higher than those in other treatments. There appeared to be some synergism effects between fresh cassava leaves and the fresh water spinach as the N retention of pigs fed the mixture fresh water spinach and fresh cassava leave diet (21.0g/day) was almost as high as on the fresh water spinach diet (24.6g/day) and higher than cassava leave diet  (16.7 g/day). In conclusion, fresh water spinach and mixing water spinach with cassava leaves could be a good protein sources for pigs. 

Key words:   Digestibility, growing pigs, fresh cassava leaves, water spinach

Introduction

In Cambodia, pig production is important for poor farmers in terms of main family income sources, money savings and festivals. Normally, farmers keep around 1-3 heads/ household. Most still practice the traditional scavenging system or a form of semi confinement using poor quality rice by-products without protein/amino acid supplementation and local and/or crossbred between local and exotic breeds. For these reasons pigs grow slowly and take a long time to reach slaughter weight.  

Recently, many researchers have developed systems to use protein-rich forages for pigs to replace expensive and imported fish meal and soybean meal. Several studies have been done on amino acid profiles of forages rich in protein and found that Lysine, Isoleucine and Leucine are  limiting amino acids for pigs (Le Duc Ngoan and Lindberg, 2001; Le Van An et al., 2003). Apparent ileal digestibility of some local protein sources have been studied in growing pigs (Bui Huy Nhu Phu et al. 2000; Le Duc Ngoan and Lindberg, 2001; Le Van An et al. 2003). Positive effects of supplementation of Methionine and Lysine in diets based on cassava foliages were reported by Nguyen Thi Loc et al., (2003) and Du Thanh Hang et al., (2009b). Mixing cassava leaves with water spinach in pig diets let to improve intake and animal growth rates (experiment 1 and 2).  However, it is not known if this is due to improving digestibility of the protein in water spinach and cassava leaves or an improvement in the amino acid profile balance in the diets.

Objective

The aim of the present experiment was therefore, to study the total tract digestibility of DM, N, OM, CF and NDF on crossbred pigs fed diets contained the fresh cassava leaves, fresh water spinach and a mixture of fresh water spinach and cassava leaves as protein sources with a basal diet of rice bran, broken rice and fish meal in Cambodia.

Materials and Methods

Experimental animal and treatments

Four crossbred (Hainam breed x Large White) castrate male pigs with a body weight of 50.3kg (SEM±1.44) were used in this study. There were four dietary treatments, including Control diet (CTRL), Fresh cassava leaves (FCL), Fresh water spinach (WS), and Mixture of fresh water spinach and fresh cassava leaves (WSFCL) (50:50 DM basis). The control diet was composed of fish meal (FM), broken rice (BR), rice bran (RB) and premix, while other foliages treatment were composted of the same ingredients in CTRL treatment but low level of fish meal in the diets, however, all diets were balance crude protein and energy. The treatments were:

Experimental feeds and feeding

The cassava variety used in this experiment was known locally breed as called Damlong Kor (sweet variety) and was harvested everyday for pigs after about 3-4 months planting. Stems and petioles were removed from the leaves and then the leaves were chopped into small pieces (about 2-3cm) and offered to pigs immediately. Water spinach was chopped into small pieces and offered immediately at the same time as the fresh cassava leaves (FCL).  

The daily feed offer in dry matter was calculated based on feed consume daily and varied from 2.5-4.5% of the body weight. Pigs were fed thrice daily with equal rations at 8:00, 12:00 and 17:00h and given as a wet mash. The amount of feed offer was reduced if refusals were observed. Fish meal (FM), broken rice (BR), rice bran (RB) and premix were thoroughly mixed together and then fed to pig first prior foliage (FCL, WS and mixture WSFCL). The mixture of FCL and WS were in the ratio 50:50 in DM basis (the proportion used in this experiment was different in experiments 1 and 2 which used 40:60 and 60:40 in DM basis for water spinach and cassava leaves respectively and resulted showed that both proportion were not different on daily weight gain and by the ways, in order to make easy in practical work, new proportion was assigned with 50:50 in DM basis in this study). Water was permanently supplied through low pressure nipples. The animals were weighed at the beginning of the trial and every 12 days. Basal diet was very homogenized, through this method, intake of feed ingredients were calculated, if feed refusals were observed. 

Table 1: Ingredient content and chemical composition of the diets

 

Diets1

FCL

WS

WSFCL

CTRL

Ingredients, % DM basis

 

 

 

 

Cassava leaves

28

0

14

0

Water spinach

0

28

14

0

Fish meal

6

3

4.5

13.5

Broken rice

43

27

35

25.5

Rice bran

21

40

30.5

59

Bio premix 17*

2

2

2

2

Total

100

100

100

100

Calculated chemical composition in % DM basis#

Dry matter

72.6

67.9

70.3

90.4

Organic matter

92.3

89.4

90.8

88.5

Crude protein

17.1

17.2

17.2

17.2

Crude fiber

8.4

15.2

11.8

15.2

Neutral detergent fiber

23.7

31.7

27.7

31.7

Ca

0.750

0.616

0.683

0.962

P

0.621

0.609

0.615

0.880

ME, Kcal/kg

3070

2932

3001

3008

HCN, mg/kg

100.2

0.0

50.1

0.0

Arginine

0.809

0.797

0.803

0.831

Histidine

0.303

0.344

0.324

0.354

Isoleucine

1.133

1.023

1.078

1.092

Leucine

0.670

0.644

0.657

0.690

Lysine

0.551

0.537

0.544

0.516

Methionine

0.199

0.173

0.186

0.187

Phenylalanine

0.752

0.698

0.725

0.766

Threonine

0.398

0.331

0.364

0.309

Valine

0.630

0.635

0.632

0.709

*Amount per kg: Vitamin A: 2800000UI, Vitamin D3: 324000UI, Vitamin E: 2100UI, Vitamin B1: 240mg, Vitamin B2: 440mg, Vitamin B12: 3200mcg, Biotim: 4800mcg, Pantothenic Acid: 2000mg, Fe: 25200mg, Cu: 14400mg, Zn: 37800mg, Mn: 10800mg, I: 252mg, Se: 216mg
1 CTRL= Control diet; FCL= Fresh cassava leaves; WS= Water spinach; WSFCL= Mixture of fresh water spinach and fresh cassava leaves (50:50 DM basis)
# Derived from chemical analysis of samples during experiment and from reference

Experimental design

The experiment was conducted in a 4*4 Latin Square (Figure 1) with the experimental period of 12 days comprising 7 days of adaptation to each diet followed by 5 days to collect feces, feed refusal and urine. All pigs were housed in metabolism cages during the whole trial (48days). 

Figure 1: Experimental layout

Column/Row

1

2

3

4

1

WSFCL

WS

FCL

CTRL

2

WS

FCL

CTRL

WSFCL

3

FCL

CTRL

WSFCL

WS

4

CTRL

WSFCL

WS

FCL

Sample collection

Samples of feeds offered, refusals (in case), urine and faeces were collected daily and weighed, and 10% of the collected amount as faecal sample were stored at -180C until the end of each collection period. A representative sample was obtained from every treatment, mixed thoroughly by hand and then homogenized in a coffee grinder and dried at 600C prior to analyses of DM, OM, HCN, N CF, NDF and amino acids. Urine was collected in a plastic bucket to which sulphuric acid was added to maintain the pH below 4.0 (20ml of concentrated H2SO4). The volume of urine was measured every day and 10% of the total volume was stored at -180C until the end of each period, when a sample was taken for N analysis.

Chemical analyses

The chemical composition of the diets, faeces and urine was determined using the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) methods (1990). Dry matter (DM) was measured by drying fresh samples at 60oC for 24 hours. Total nitrogen (N) was determined on fresh samples by the Kjeldahl method and CP was calculated from total nitrogen (N*6.25). Crude fibre (CF) and Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was determined according to Van Soest et al (1991). All samples were analyzed in duplicates. Amino acids of feed ingredient and faeces were analyzed according to Spackman et al. (1958) on an ion exchange column using HPLC. Samples were weighed as mg and then adding 100 ml HCl 6N to hydrolyze at 110°C for 22 hours, then checking pH with V ml Na2CO3 and take 25 ml of mix add 100 ml reagent l to load of sorbet tip and elute sample by adding 50ml iso-octane and 100ml chloroform to emulsify sample, transfer part of the organic layer in vial to evaporate, after that re-dissolve in 1 ml HPLC mobile to LC/MS analysis. (Standard 20 nmol/ ml)

%AAs: (Ssample x Cstandard x Vfirst x Vfinal x M)/ (Sstandard x Vtaked mix x W (g)).

Statistical analyses

Analysis of variance was performed according to a 4*4 Latin-square design using the general linear models of Minitab statistic software (Minitab 2007 version 15.12). Sources of variation were: column, row, treatments and random error. When the F-test was significant at P<0.05, pair wise comparisons were performed using Turkey’s procedure (Minitab Statistical Software). The model used was:

Yijk = μ + Ti + Pj +Ak + eijk

In where, Yijk = Dependent variables

μ = overall mean

Ti = treatment effect (i=1-4)

Pj = column effect (j=1-4)

Ak = row effect (k=1-4)

eijk = random error 

Results and discussion

Chemical composition of feeds ingredients

Chemical compositions of feed ingredients were determined during the trial and indicated some remarkable differences between fresh cassava leaves and fresh water spinach. The content of DM, OM and NDF in fresh cassava leaves was significantly higher than in water spinach but it was in the other way around for CP and CF. DM contents of basal diet ingredients were almost similar, around 90%. The highest content of CP was found in fish meal with 59.9%. Crude fiber was not found in broken rice, while it was 25% in rice bran. Organic matter and CP of water spinach in our study were in agreement with Bui Huy Nhu Phuc (2000) with 88.8 and 26.4%, respectively, but NDF content was higher, 38.7% compared with 22.9%. HCN content in this study was 357.7 mg/kg DM that was in agreement with experiment 2 and 3 (351 and 378mg/kg DM, respectively) and higher than the study of Nguyen Duy Quynh Tram and Preston (2004) with 269mg/kg DM.  

Table 2:  Chemical composition of the dietary ingredients used for experiment 4 in DM basis

 

Ingredients1

FCL

WS

FM

BR

RB

Dry matter, %

29.4

10.6

90

88.1

91.2

Organic matter, %

93.9

87.4

76.4

99

89.7

Crude protein, %

26.1

29.8

59.9

8.78

11.7

Crude fiber, %

10.5

18.3

3.2b

0

25

NDF, %

43.9

38.7

10.3

0

51.3

HCN, mg/kg

357.7

-

-

-

-

ME Kcal/kg

2532 a

2533a

2866 a

3704f

2842a

Ca, %

1c

0.9d

5.0e

0.2f

0.4g

P, %

0.5c

0.5d

2.7e

0.4f

0.7g

Essential amino acid, %

       

Arginine

0.923

0.761

0.811

0.722

0.911

Histidine

0.399

0.417

0.483

0.175

0.414

Isoleucine

1.543

1.285

2.560

0.830

0.906

Leucine

0.922

0.820

1.548

0.435

0.627

Lysine

0.759

0.723

0.921

0.424

0.480

Methionine

0.215

0.148

0.241

0.203

0.174

Phenylalanine

1.018

0.845

1.745

0.511

0.679

Threonine

0.725

0.687

1.474

0.199

0.101

Valine

0.817

0.793

1.705

0.378

0.648

Essential amino acid, in g/16g N

       

Arginine

3.562

2.572

1.354

8.187

7.796

Histidine

1.526

1.408

0.807

1.985

3.545

Isoleucine

5.908

4.333

4.276

9.423

7.754

Leucine

3.544

2.765

2.586

4.934

5.367

Lysine

2.924

2.443

1.539

4.816

4.107

Methionine

0.812

0.497

0.403

2.307

1.488

Phenylalanine

3.909

2.859

2.914

5.796

5.807

Threonine

2.789

2.328

2.462

2.256

0.864

Valine

3.148

2.677

2.848

4.294

5.547

Tot EAA

28.122

21.883

19.188

43.999

42.275

1.FCL: Fresh cassava leaves; WS: Fresh water spinach; FM: Fish meal; BR: Broken rice; RB: Rice bran; NDF= Neutral detergent fiber; HCN= Hydrogen cyanic acid, Metabolisable energy;
a.
Nguyen T H Ly et al., (2010); b. Nguyen Thi Thuy et al., (2011); c Gohl (1994); d. Ly Thi Men et al., (2000); e. David (1991); f. NIAH, (1995); g. Chanphone and Choke (2003)

 The essential amino acids in cassava leaves have similar value with water spinach. Both forages (cassava leaves and water spinach) have closed value of amino acid with fish meal except Iso, Leu, Lys, Phe, Thr and Val, which were higher in fish meal. Amino acid profile in broken rice were similar value with rice bran but in rice bran was high on Arg, His, Leu, Phe and Val. However, the amino acid content in water spinach and cassava leaves in this study were lower than other studies of Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al., (2000); Le Thi Men et al., (2005) on water spinach and Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al., (2000), Woolfe. (1992) cited by Le Van An. (2003), Bui Huy Nhu Phuc and Lindberg (2001) on cassava leaves. The total essential amino acids of  water spinach and cassava leaves in this study were 22% and 28%, respectively which were lower than above studies nearly twice times (over 45%).  

Table 3: Essential amino acid in water spinach

 

g/16g N

% in DM

%  in DM

 

a

b. Compost

b. Biodigester

Arginine

6.0

1.25

1.12

Histidine

1.6

0.55

0.60

Isoleucine

3.8

1.51

1.37

Leucine

7.2

1.66

1.70

Lysine

4.2

0.97

0.89

Methionine

1.7

0.45

0.57

Phenylalanine

5.2

1.10

1.11

Threonine

4.1

1.09

0.96

Tyrosine

3.7

-

-

Valine

5.2

1.49

1.45

a. Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al., (2000), b. Le Thi Men et al., (2005)

 

Table 4: Essential amino acid in cassava leaves, g/16g N

 

Sun dried (a)

Ensiled (a)

 

b

C

   Arginine

6.5

5.6

Arginine

-

5.9

   Histidine

1.8

1.7

Histidine

2.2

1.9

   Isoleucine

4.2

4.2

Isoleucine

4.9

4.4

   Leucine

8.3

8.3

Leucine

8.6

8.0

   Lysine

5.5

5.4

Lysine

6.2

5.6

   Methionine

1.6

1.4

Methionine + Cystine

2.8

1.5

   Phenylalanine

6.2

5.6

Phenylalanine + Tyrosine

9.4

5.7

   Threonine

4.1

3.9

Threonine

4.7

4.0

   Tyrosine

4.4

4.4

Tryptophan

1.5

-

   Valine

5.6

5.3

Valine

5.7

5.3

S EAA

48.2

45.8

S EAA

46.0

42.3

a.Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al., (2000), b. Woolfe, (1992) cited by Le Van An (2003), c. Bui Huy Nhu Phuc and Lindberg (2001)

Amino acid content in fish meal in this study was lower than fish meal that has protein content 64.5, 56.8, 65.0 and 62.2% which studied by Famino et al., (2004), La Van Kinh et al., (no year), NRC (1994), respectively. The low content of fish meal in present study might be due to fish meal sellers who put some material such as sand or soil or other heavy materials in order to get high profit, even though, CP content is high (59.9%) but this value can be also effect by adding some materials such as urea, animal hair or skin or nail. 

Table 5: Essential amino acid in fish meal, % DM basis

 

a. % DM

b.% of CP

c. % of CP

%CP in DM

64.5

56.8

65

62.2

   Arginine

3.61

5.23

3.81

4.02

   Histidine

1.55

2.21

1.59

1.34

   Isoleucine

2.10

3.49

3.06

2.72

   Leucine

4.14

6.69

4.98

4.36

   Lysine

4.14

6.71

5.07

4.53

   Methionine

1.09

2.47

1.95

1.68

   Phenylalanine

2.24

2.74

2.75

2.28

   Threonine

2.38

3.67

2.82

2.57

   Valine

3.00

4.21

3.46

3.02

a Famino et al., (2004), b La Van Kinh et al (no year), c. Poultry NRC, 1994

Feed intake

Total intake of DM, CP, CF, NDF and intake (g/kg live weight) were highest in control diet (CTRL) and then water spinach (WS) and mixture of water spinach and fresh cassava leaves (WSFCL), and lowest in fresh cassava leaves (FCL) treatment. The DM intake as percentage of live weight (LW) on WS was 3.15% that is in agreement with Prak Kea et al., (2003), who used the same diet but lower than that reported by Chhay Ty et al., (2005a) on both WS and WSFCL. This is due to pigs used in previous studies fed broken rice at 2% of live weight (LW) and WS fed ad libitum while in the present study WS and other ingredients are offered based on formula which was planned during the experiment. However, feed intake as percentage of LW was improved when pigs fed mixture WSFCL as agreed with Chhay Ty et al., (2005a) and Bounhong et al., (2004). DM intake as percentage of LW in FCL (2.60%) in this study was ranged to that reported by Du Thanh Hang (2005) (2.7 to 3.3%), for crossbred pigs fed a 2:1 mixture of ensiled cassava root and rice bran and fresh cassava leaves that had been washed prior to feeding and similar values reported by Nguyen Duy Quynh Tram and Preston (2004) and Bounhong et al., (2004) (2.6 and 3.11%,  respectively), who used similar diets as in the present study but no fish meal. However, a much higher intake (4.4%) was recorded for pigs fed broken rice and cassava leaves that had been ensiled before feeding (Chhay Ty et al. 2003b). It would appear that ensiling the leaves increases their palatability and the low voluntary intake could have been due to characteristics of fiber of ingredients and the presence of cyanogenic glycosides and tannins in fresh cassava leaves. According to Ravindran et al., (1987), the bitter taste of the cassava leaves could negatively influence pig intake. 

The HCN intake in FCL was nearly twice higher than mixture WSFCL. This result is similar with the study of Chhay Ty et al., (2005a), who reported that got up to 125mg/day on FCL alone compared with 83.9mg/day for mixture WSFCL. The intake of HCN (mg/kg live weight) (2.52) in this study was higher than that reported by Getter and Baine (1938) with 1.4 mg/kg BW but lower than Butler, (1973) with 4.4 mg/kg LW; Tewe, (1992) with 3.5 mg/kg LW; Chhay Ty et al., (2005a) with 5.1 and 7.4 mg/kg LW for WSFCL and FCL, respectively but supplementing with 0.3% Met in diets. Du Thanh Hang, (2005) recorded that even higher intakes (from 6.0 to 15 mg/kg live weight) when feeding fresh cassava leaves with ensiled cassava root and rice bran. Gómez, (1991) suggested that 100 mg HCN/kg feed could be the permissible maximum level for animal. However, many studies mentioned above did not report any health problem or death of animals caused by HCN intoxication. 

Table 6: Mean values of feed intake for pigs fed control diet, fresh cassava leaves, water spinach or a mixture of the two, as supplements to rice bran, broken rice and fish meal

 

FCL

WS

WSFCL

CTRL

SEM

Prob

Mean value of BW, kg

59.6

59.9

59.8

59.4

0.228

0.459

Intake, g/day in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fresh cassava leaves

413.9

0

228.5

0

9.95

0.001

Fresh water spinach

0

482.2

221.8

0

5.57

0.001

Fish meal

95.3

56.9

79.1

296.2

5.69

0.001

Broken rice

683.3

511.6

615.5

559.4

19.8

0.001

Rice bran

333.7

757.9

536.4

1294.3

26.4

0.001

Premix

31.2

37.1

34.5

43.0

1.13

0.001

Total feed intake in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

g/day

1557.4a

1845.6b

1715.7ab

2192.9c

55.8

0.001

g/kg live weight#

26.0a

31.5b

29.6b

37.1c

1.05

0.001

Total crude protein intake in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

g/day

263.6a

310.8b

289.3ab

377.9c

9.39

0.001

g/kg live weight#

4.39a

5.30b

4.99b

6.40c

0.18

0.001

Total crude fiber intake in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

g/day

132.7a

279.6b

200.9c

333.1d

7.74

0.001

g/kg live weight#

2.4a

4.93b

3.69c

6.4d

0.15

0.001

Total NDF intake in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

g/day

370.8a

581.9b

468.5c

694.5d

16.3

0.001

g/kg live weight#

6.43a

10.2b

8.42c

12.9d

0.32

0.001

HCN in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

mg/day

149.4

0

83.6

0

2.85

0.001

mg/kg live weight#

2.52

0

1.47

0

0.06

0.001

FCL= Fresh cassava leaves; WS= Fresh water spinach; WSFCL= Water spinach mix with fresh cassava leaves; CTRL= Control diet
# Range of body weight (59.4 – 59.9 kg) used for calculation                                                                                        
abcd: Means within main effects within rows without common letter are different at P<0.05

Faecal characteristics in pigs fed fresh cassava leaves, fresh water spinach

Faeces of pigs fed CTRL diet had higher DM, CF and NDF contents than those of FCL, WS and WSFCL. However, faeces of pigs fed CTRL diet had lower contents of OM and N than other diets. A total fresh faeces excretion was not significant difference among treatments (P>0.05) but faeces excretion in dry matter was lowest in WS (P<0.001). The DM content of faeces, excretion in dry matter and water in this study were higher than previous studies reported by Chhay Ty et al., (2005a). This might be due to the LW of pigs used in this study (50.3±1.44kg) were heavier than study of Chhay Ty et al., (2005a) with 15.1kg. In addition, in that experiment pigs were fed broken rice at 2% of body weight and WS fed ad libitum while in the present study WS and other ingredients were offered based on formula which was planed during the experiment. 

Table 7: Fecal characteristics in pigs fed control diet, fresh cassava leaves, water spinach or a mixture of the two, as supplements to rice bran, broken rice and fish meal

Express in  % DM basis

FCL

WS

WSFCL

CTRL

SEM

Prob

Dry matter

33.5a

24.1b

27.4c

34.9d

0.22

0.001

Organic matter

80.8a

80.5a

81.4a

76.0b

0.45

0.001

Nitrogen

3.80a

3.12b

3.93a

2.74c

0.05

0.001

Crude fiber

24.6a

30.4b

24.9a

35.0c

0.36

0.001

Neutral detergent fiber

52.9a

52.9a

52.8a

56.6b

0.34

0.001

Faecal excretion, g/kg DM intake

 

 

 

Fresh material

689.9

695.6

741.1

610.06

38.1

0.13

Dry matter

229.3a

167.2b

202.1ab

212.8a

11.9

0.001

Water

460.6a

528.4ab

539.0ab

397.8ac

27.2

0.001

FCL= Fresh cassava leaves; WS= Water spinach; WSFCL= Water spinach mix with fresh cassava leaves; CTRL: Control diet
abc
: Means within main effects within rows without common letter are different at P<0.05

Nutrient digestibility

Digestibility of DM, OM, N, CF and NDF in WS treatment was higher than other treatments of CTRL, WSFCL and the lowest was FCL. The low digestibility of FCL could be affected by anti nutrition compounds in this plant such as HCN and tannin because HCN is colorless, volatile and extremely poisonous when hydrocyanic acid is generated (Van Soest, 1994). However, Stosic and Kaykay (1981) noted that small quantities of HCN ingest on a regular basis, though not large enough to cause mortality, might be sufficient to affect the general health and productivity of the animal. According to Humphreys (1988), intake of feeds containing over 20mg HCN/100g are potentially dangerous to livestock. Tannins have been considered as anti-nutrients due to a range of adverse effects including reduced feed intake and digestibility (Chung et al. 1998 and Onwuka, 1992). Tannin content in cassava leaves is reported to increase with maturity and varied between cultivars, from 30-50g/kg DM (Ravindran, 1993).

However, the digestibility coefficient of DM for FCL in this study (77.1%) was similar to the value of 77% as reported by Chhay Ty et al., (2003b) when the cassava leaves was ensiled but lower than that reported by Nguyen Duy Quynh Tram and Preston (2004) with 89% and Bounhong et al., (2004) with 84%. The digestibility of N in FCL was 67.3%, higher than that reported by Chhay Ty et al., (2005a) with 60% and Bounhong et al., (2004) with 65% but lower than that reported by Nguyen Duy Quynh Tram and Preston (2004) with 74%. This might be due to low intakes of FCL and high intake of broken rice in their study, which would have the effect on increasing digestibility. In term of digestibility for DM and N in WS treatment was 83.3 and 80.6%, respectively, and ranged values with reported by Chhay Ty et al., (2005a) with 89 and 82% for DM and N, respectively for pig fed WS 47% in the diet. Prak Kea et al., (2003) reported that DM and N digestibility of diet with 35% water spinach as the only supplement to broken rice (in DM) were 89 and 77%, respectively. 

The digestibility of CF and NDF was observed high for WS treatment than other treatments especially CTRL treatment, this could be cause of high feed intake and fiber intake in CTRL diet. Ogle (2006) mention that high CF content in the diets reduces the nutrient digestibility, especially of CP, fibrous feeds in the diet also lead to an increased rate of passage of digesta through the gut and reduced ileal and total tract digestibility and affect on gut size and development, particularly the large intestine (An et al. 2004 and Jorgensen et al. 1996). Nearly all CF digestion takes place in the caecum and colon, where bacteria break down fermentable carbohydrates that have escaped digestion in the stomach and small intestine. However, levels of more than 7-10% of CF in the diet will generally result in decreased growth rates (Kass et al. 1980). Ravindra et al., (1987) observe in pigs a depression in digestibility of DM, EE, cell wall components and hemicelluloses in diets in which CLM is replaced by coconut oil meal. Sarwat et al., (1988) also observe lower digestibility of DM and OM when CLM is included in a sorghum base diets of growing pigs. Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al., (1996) report a significant reduction in apparent digestibility of DM, OM, CF and EE as the level of inclusion of CLM meal increase from zero to 216g/kg diet.  

Table 8: Mean values of apparent digestibility in pigs fed control diet, fresh cassava leaves, water spinach or a mixture of the two as supplements to rice bran, broken rice and fish meal

 

FCL

WS

WSFCL

CTRL

SEM

Prob

Dry matter

77.1a

83.3b

79.8ab

78.7a

1.11

0.012

Organic matter

79.8a

85.0b

81.9ab

81.7ab

1.07

0.034

Nitrogen

67.3a

80.6b

70.7a

78.9b

1.68

0.001

Crude fiber

36.2a

66.2b

56.9bc

51.0cd

2.86

0.001

Neutral detergent fiber

50.9a

71.9b

60.9c

62.0cd

2.21

0.001

Biological value

56.6

60.8

64.1

59.2

2.52

0.215

FCL= Fresh cassava leaves; WS= Water spinach; WSFCL= Water spinach mix with fresh cassava leaves; CTRL: Control diet
abc
: Means within main effects within rows without common letter are different at P<0.05

Digestibility of essential amino acids of CTRL and WS diets were higher than those of FCL diet. Combining WS and FCL increased AA digestibility compared to FCL. The digestibility of essential amino acids in FCL treatment ranged with study of Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al., (2000), who showed digestibility of Arg 80, 82; His 77,79; Iso 70,69; Leu 74,76; Lys 79,79; Met 70, 71; Phe 76,78; Thr 66,68 and Val 67, 66% for dry and ensiled cassava leaves which used at level of 15% in the diet and basal diet from cassava root meal and soybean meal, respectively. 

Table 9: Mean values of amino acid digestibility in pigs fed control diet, fresh cassava leaves, water spinach or a mixture of the two as supplements to rice bran, broken rice and fish meal

 

FCL

WS

WSFCL

CTRL

SEM

Prob

Essential amino acid, % in DM basis

 

 

 

 

Arginine

80.6a

92.8b

87.1c

93.7b

1.16

0.001

Histidine

78.6a

91.6b

81.9a

89.1b

1.15

0.001

Isoleucine

76.4a

88.0b

79.1a

86.0b

1.33

0.001

Leucine

73.6a

86.4b

76.8a

85.3b

1.47

0.001

Lysine

75.0a

87.3b

76.4a

82.2c

1.48

0.001

Methionine

77.4a

90.9b

81.7a

89.3c

1.45

0.001

Phenylalanine

74.5a

89.4b

77.3a

86.9b

1.41

0.001

Threonine

83.0a

84.1a

69.0b

88.6a

2.43

0.001

Valine

68.5a

87.3b

76.8c

84.8b

1.69

0.001

FCL: Fresh cassava leaves, WS: Fresh water spinach, WSFCL: Fresh water spinach mix with fresh cassava leaves, CTRL: control diet
abc
: Means within main effects within rows without common letter are different at P<0.05

Nitrogen balance

Daily N intake was highest for CTRL diet followed by WS and WSFCL and lowest in FCL (P<0.001). This means total N excretion was highest for CTRL but not differences in N excretion among FCL, WS and WSFCL. Daily N retention is superior for CTRL (28.1g/d) and WS (24.6g/d) but low in FCL (16.7g/d). There appeared to be some synergism and interaction between FCL and WS as the N retention on WSFCL (21.0g/day) was almost as high as on the WS (24.6g/day). In previous experiment on growth performance with the same diets, we indicated that the mixture of cassava leaves and water spinach may even be superior to the water spinach alone, thus providing support for the hypothesis that mixtures of fresh cassava leaves and water spinach may have a complementary action in providing the required nutrients for animals. The N retention in FCL (16.7g) in this study was higher than that of Chhay Ty et al., (2003b, 2005a), Nguyen Duy Quynh Tram and Preston (2004) and Bounhong et al., (2004). In the present study, fish meal is added at level of 6% in the diet that may improve amino acid in the diets. Eggum (1970) reported that imbalance in the diets containing cassava leaves may be a factor affecting nutrient digestibility of pigs as well as the study of Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al., (2001), who reported that Met as well as Lys was the major limiting amino acids for N retention, as well as biological value. Chhay Ty et al., (2005a) reported that supplementing with 0.3% of Met in fresh cassava leaves improved significantly digestibility of DM and OM. Furthermore, Adegbola (1977) concluded that when Met was added 0.2% in diet with 20% of dry cassava leaves, it would be improved amino acid as well protein quality. 

Table 10:  Mean values for N retention in pigs fed control diet, fresh cassava leaves, water spinach or a mixture of the two, as supplements to rice bran, broken rice and fish meal

 

FCL

WS

WSFCL

CTRL

SEM

Prob

N balance, g/day in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

Intake

42.2a

49.7b

46.3ab

60.5c

1.51

0.001

Excretion, g/day in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

Faecal 

13.8

9.64

13.7

12.9

0.92

0.001

Urinary

11.7

15.5

11.5

19.6

0.97

0.001

Total excretion

25.5a

27.2a

26.7a

32.4b

1.25

0.001

N retention in DM basis

 

 

 

 

 

g/day

16.7a

24.6bc

21.0ac

28.1b

1.45

0.001

% digested N (BV)

56.6

60.8

64.1

59.2

2.52

0.215

%  N intake 

39.6

49.1

45.7

46.6

2.28

0.03

FCL= Fresh cassava leaves; WS= Water spinach; WSFCL= Water spinach mix with fresh cassava leaves; CTRL: Control diet
 abc
: Means within main effects within rows without common letter are different at P<0.05

 The relationship between N intake and N retention was plotted. It can be seen from figure 10 that, there was linearly increased (R2 = 0.88) nitrogen retention as nitrogen intake increased. The result in this study was similar with study of Nguyen Duy Quynh Tram and Preston (2004). The authors reported that relationship between N intake and N retention was very high (R2 = 0.86).

Figure 2: Effect of N intake on N retention

 Conclusions

Acknowledgements 

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the MEKARN project financed by the SIDA-SAREC Agency and to the Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid), for providing resources for conducting this experiment.

References 

Adegbola M O K  1977  Field sprays of fungicides for the control of Phytophthora pod rot. Annual Rept. Cocoa Res. Inst. Nigr. Lbadan. 1975/76:76-77opical environment

 

An L V, Hong T T T and Lindberg J E  2004  Ileal and total tract digestibility in growing pigs fed cassava root meal diets with inclusion of fresh, dry and ensiled sweet potato leaves. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 127-139.

 

AOAC  1990  Official methods of analysis. Association of official analytical chemists 15th Edition (K

Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230

 

Bounhong Norachack, Soukanh Keonouchanh, Chhay Ty, Bounthong Bouahom and Preston T R  2004 

Stylosanthes and cassava leaves as protein supplements to a basal diet of broken rice for local pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development Vol. 16, Art. #74. Retrieved January 20, 2011, from

http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/10/boun16074.htm

 

Bui Huy Nhu Phuc  2000  Tropical Forages for growing pings. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2000

 

Bui Huy Nhu Phuc, Ogle B and Lindberg J K  2001  Nutritive value of cassava leaves for monogastric animals; Proceedings of workshop on “Use of cassava as animal feed” Khon Kaen University,

Thailand http://www.mekarn.org/prockk/phuc.htm

 

Bui Huy Nhu Phuc, Preston T R, Ogle B and Lindberg J E  1996  the nutritive value of sun-dried and ensiled cassava leaves for growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 8: (3)

http://www.lrrd.org./lrrd8/3/bui.htm

 

Butler G W  1973  Physiological and genetic aspects of cyanogenic in cassava and other plants, chronic cassava toxicity. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop, London England, 29-30 Jan., 1973. IDRC -010e, pp. 65-71

 

Chhay Ty and Preston T R  2005a  Effect of water spinach and fresh cassava leaves on intake, digestibility and N retention in growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol.17, Art.#23. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/2/chha17023.htm

 

Chhay Ty, Preston T R and Ly J  2003b  The use of ensiled cassava leaves in diets for growing pigs. 2. The influence of type of palm oil and cassava leaf maturity on digestibility and N balance for growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15)8 Retrieved, from

 

Chung K, Wong T Y, Wei C, Huang Y and Lin Y  1998  Tannin and human health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 38:421-464.

 

Du Thanh Hang and Preston T R  2005  The effects of simple processing methods of cassava leave on HCN content and intake by growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 17, Article #99. Retrieved September 7, 2005, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/9/hang17099.htm

 

Du Thanh Hang, Linh Nguyen Quang, Preston T R, Everts H and Beynen A C  2009b  Effect of supplementary DL-methionine in pig diets with cassava leaves as a major protein source. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 21, Article #15. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/1/hang21015.htm

 

Eggum B O  1970  The protein quality of cassava leaves. British Journal of Nutrition. 24: 761-768

 

Famino A.O, Oduguwa B.O, Oduguwa O.O, Ajasa O.Y and Jegede O  2004  Feeding value of shrimp meal for growing pigs. Archivos de Zootecnia, ano/vol.53, numero 201 Universidad de cordoba, Espana. pp. 77-85

 

Getter A O and Baine J  1938  Research on cyanide detoxification. American Journal of Medical\Science. pp. 185-189
 

Gomez G G  1991  Use of cassava products in pigs feeding. Pigs News and Information 12, 387-390

http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/8/chha158.htm

 

Humphreys D J  1988  Veterinary Toxicology, 3rd ed. Bailliere Tindall, London

 

Jorgensen H, Zhao X, Eggum B O and Zhao X Q  1996  The influence of dietary fiber and environmental temperature on development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind gut and energy metabolism in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 75, 365-378.

 

Kass M L, Van Soest P J, Pond W G, Lewis B and McDowell R E  1980  Utilization of dietary Fiber from alfalfa by growing swine. I. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Animal Science 50. 175-181

 

La Van Kinh, Huynh Thank Hoai, Nguyen Thi Yen and Dong Kieu Oanh  no year  Chemical composition of various fish and fish meal as feed ingredient for pigs and poultry. Institute of Agriculture Sciences for Southern Vietnam (IAS)

 

Le Duc Ngoan and Lindberg J E  2001  Ileal and total tract digestibility in growing pigs fed cassava root and rice bran with inclusion of fishmeal and fresh or ensiled shrimp by-products. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 216-223

 

Le Thi Men and Preston T R  2005  On-farm evaluation of effect of different fertilizers on water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) yields, and of including water spinach and catfish oil in diets for fastening pigs in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, from: http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/lemen38.htm

 

Le Van An, Bodil E, Frankow Lindberg and Lindberg J E  2003  Effect of harvesting interval and defoliation on yield and chemical composition of leaves, stems and tubers of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam) plant parts Field Crops Research 82 (2003) 49-58. www.elsevier.com/locale/fer

 

MINITAB  2007  Minitab reference Manual release 15.1.2.

 

National Research Council  NRC   1994  Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, Ninth Revised Edition, 1994. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.1994

 

Nguyen Duy Quynh Tram and Preston T R  2004  Effect of method of processing cassava leaves on intake, digestibility and N retention by Ba Xuyen piglets. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. # 80. Retrieved, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/10/tram16080.htm

 

Nguyen Thi Loc and Le Khac Huy  2003  Effect of DL-methionine supplementation levels in ensiled cassava root-based diets on the performance and economic efficiency of F1 (Large White x Mong Cai) fattening pigs. In: Proceedings of Final National Seminar Workshop on Sustainable Livestock Production on Local Feed Resources (Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle). HUAF-SAREC, Hue City, 25 – 28 March, 2003. Retrieved July14, 107, from http://www.mekarn.org/sarec03/loc1.htm.

 

Ogle B  2006  Forages for pigs: nutritional, physiological and practical implications. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August, 2006 http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/ogle.htm

 

Onwuka C F I  1992  Tannin and saponin contents of some Tropical browse species fed to goats. Tro. Agrc. (Trinidad) 69:1442-1440

 

Prak Kea, Preston T R and Ly J  2003  Feed intake, digestibility and N retention of a diet of water spinach supplemented with palm oil and / or broken rice and dried fish for growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15) 8 Retrieved, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/8/kea158.htm

 

Ravindran V  1993  Cassava leaves as animal feed: Potential and limitation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 61, 141-150.

 

Ravindran V, Kornegay E T and Rajaguru A S B  1987  Influence of processing methods and storage time on the cyanide potential of cassava leaf meal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 17: 227-234.

 

Sarwat S R, Katak S N and Kategile J A  1988  Performance of growing-finishing pigs when given diets containing fresh cassava leaves and roots. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal. 53:111-115

 

Spackman D H, Stein W H and Moore S  1958  Automatic recording apparatus for use in chromatography of amino acids.  Anal.Chem.30:1190-1206

 

Stosic D D and Kaykay J M  1981  Rubber seed as animal feed in Liberia. World Animal Review 39,2939.

 

Tewe O O  1992  Detoxification of cassava products and effects of residual toxins on consuming animals. In:  Roots, tubers, plantains and bananas in animal feeding. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 95. http://www.fao.org/Docrep/003/T0554E/T0554E06.htm

 

Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp 154

 

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991 Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597

 

Woolfe J A  1992  Sweet potato: an untapped food source. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

643 pp

 

Go to top