The primary results of the study on utilizing plant by-products and pig manure to develop aquaculture for ethnic farmers in Hongha and Huongnguyen communes, Aluoi district, Thuathien Hue Province

Livestock Research for Rural Development (17) 03 2005

Contents LRRD 1703 Guidelines to authors LRRD News

Citation of this paper

The primary results of the study on utilizing plant by-products and pig manure to develop aquaculture for ethnic farmers in Hongha and Huongnguyen communes, Aluoi district,Thuathien Hue Province.

                                   Nguyen Phi Nam

Aquaculture division - Faculty of Animal science

Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry

Abstract

The study to find out species of suitable animals is very necessary for the rural area, especially in remove mountain areas. Two treatments to raise fish, and integrated pig and fish are carried out in Hongha and Huongnguyen communes. In the first treatment, fish were cultured and fed agricultural by-products (such as leaves, roots of cassava; peanuts; sweet potato, banana, grass.) and small part of supplement feed. The second one, that kinds of feed were used for pigs, then manure of pigs was fed for fish. The results showed that integrated pigs and fish in household can get profit (efficiency of capital is 24.84%), however the using directly agricultural by-products in fishpond get very high efficiency in economic (IRR of treatment 1 and 2 are 0.793 and 0.25, in respectively). FCR of fish in treatment 1 are from 5.1 to 6.9 (it's rather high, but the farmers can collect it around their houses). And FCR of treatment 2 are from 3.8 to 3.29 (lower than treatment 1 but they have to pay more money for it). The primary result of study showed that in the using agricultural by-products in fishpond is suitable in the poor rural areas in Thua Thien Hue province.

INTRODUCTION

Hongha and Huong nguyen are two the poorest communes of the mountainous Aluoi district, Thua Thien Hue Province. Both communes has more than 430 households (over 4500 people). In these, more than 95% of them are ethnic people. The living standard of the people in these communes is still low. Their income mainly depends on crop cultivation, such as cassava, sweet potatoes, peanuts, maize, etc.

The results of the recent studies show that there are a large number of crop by-products in this area. Most of them are not used, only a little amount is used for feeding domestic animals. However, the studies on using these by-products resource in fish culture have not been carried out yet. Therefore, the study on utilizing these by-products to feed other animal species in different ways is necessary. Hongha and Huongnguyen communes are suitable areas to meet the requirements of this study. The results of this research will help the local people to increase the efficiency of production and their living standard.

HYPOTHESIS

This research is implemented in order to find out the suitable way for using the available natural resource of green feed in mountain areas. The results will solve the problems:

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment 1: Using directly fresh green feed (by-products), such as leaves, roots of cassava; peanut, leaves of sweet potato, banana; grass, etc…as the source of feed for fish. Besides, using small amount of artificial food as the supplement.

Treatment 2:Pigs were fed with the same kind of fish in treatment 1, the manure of pig was use as the feed for fish.

The diagram of the treatments as bellow:

 

Details of the treatment are described as follows:

Treatment 1 (BP):(involved site 1-3)

+ Pond area of site 1: 180m2; site 2: 220m2; and site 3: 150m2

+ Stocking density: 2 fish/m2

+ Species of fish: Grass carp, Tilapia, mud carp with the ratio 50:25:25 respectively.

+ Feeding fish with crude crop residues, such as leaves and root cassava, leaves of peanut, banana, etc…

+ Size of fish: 54.6±3.5 g/fish.

- Treatment 2 (BP-PM): (involved site 4 to site 6)

+ Pond area of site 4: 150m2; site 2: 120m2; and site 3: 135m2

+ Each site raises 3 pigs. Breeds of pig are crossed Mongcai with Large-white. Average weight of breed pig is around 13.5kg -15.5kg.

+ Pigs were fed by feed the same of fish in treatment 1.

+ Feeding fish with the manure of pigs, which were fed with the crop by-products.

+ Species of fish: Silver carp, tilapia, mud cap, and common carp with the ratio 5:2: 2:1 respectively.

+ The density of fish was 2 fish/m2.

RESULTS

The fluctuations of environmental factors in the fish ponds

On research duration we observed the fluctuations of environmental factors of water ponds (such as: dissolved oxygen, pH, Turbidity, plankton, etc.). The data are showed on table 1.

Table 1. Environmental factors in the fish ponds

Site

Area

DO (mg/l)

pH

T (0C)

Turbidity (cm)

Plankton (cells/liter)

(m2)

1 (BP)

180

4.4 ± 0.22

7.0 - 7.6

23.4±6.5

> 65

654,000

2(BP)

220

4.2 ± 0.43

7.0 - 7.5

23.5±5.3

> 60

430,000

3(BP)

150

3.7 ± 0.46

6.8 - 7.3

22.4±6.3

> 50

812,000

4(BP-PM)

150

3.5 ± 0.25

7.0 - 7.3

23.2±6.0

40 - 50

1,150,000

5(BP-PM)

120

3.1 ± 0.44

7.0 - 7.3

22.2±6.7

40 - 50

1,272,000

6(BP-PM)

135

2.7 ± 0.63

6.8 - 7.2

23.0±5.8

40 - 50

1,543,000

The results in table 1 showed that:

-In generally, the fluctuations of the environmental factors are in endurance of cultured fish. There are some differences of DO contents in the ponds. The fluctuation is significant in the fish ponds which has smaller area. The average temperature of water is around 22.20C - 23.60C. However, the its difference is quite big (±5.30C to ± 6.80C). It was caused by air temperature of the weather of the autumn and the winter.

- In two group treatments are quite different water quality of the factors DO, turbidity, and density of plankton. In the ponds of treatment 1, DO content is always above 3.5mg O2/liter. But in the treatment 2, most of DO is under that level and the lowest in the sixth site (2,7±0.63mg/l). The turbidity and density of plankton are opposite way of DO fluctuation and they have the relation each other. It means that in the ponds which high density of plankton are more turbidity.

- The densities of plankton in ponds of treatment 2 are so high (more than 1.2 millions cells/ml. The development of plankton is result of the fertilization of pig's manure. The high density of plankton is important feed source of silver carp and tilapia.

Weight increasing of cultured fish in treatment BP

With the species of grass carp, tilapia, and mud carp culture in ponds after 4 months their weight increased rather good. They are showed in table 2

Table 2. Average fish weight during the experiment / Unit: gram/fish

Site

Time (months)

No

0

1

2

3

4

1

54.6 ± 3.5

121 ± 5.8

202 ± 8.9

333 ±7.6

502±12.6

2

54.6± 3.5

148 ±4.6

229 ±6.3

369 ±8.5

528 ± 8.7

3

54.6± 3.5

113 ± 9.4

175±11.7

266±13.4

388±14.6

The average weight of fish in the ponds of treatment 1 increased rather high. That showed that the kinds of feed for fish are suitable. The grass carp ate green feed and its manure were feed for tilapia and mud carp.

The growth of fish in site 1 and 2 are very fast and they have no significant difference (P > 0.05). However, the gained weight of fish in site 3 is lower and it is significant difference with site 1& 2 (P < 0,05).

The different fish weight in site 3 with the others is understood that the amount of green feed supplied was not enough (2,514.5 kg in site 3 compare with over 3,603 kg and 3,605 kg in site 1 and site 2, respectively). Beside, the water quality of environmental conditions in site 3 (see table 1) isn't better than site 1 and 2.

To evaluate feed conversion ratio of fish cultured in the ponds had the results as table 3.

Table 3. The FCR of fish cultured in treatment BP

Green feed (kg)

Formula

Total weight of fish (kg)

Site

Fresh

Dry

Feed (kg)

FCR

weight

matter

1

3603.6

767.6

90

161

5.3

2

3605

767.8

90

166

5.1

3

2514.5

535.5

90

100

6.9

The FCR of fish in the site 1 and 2 is similar (5.3 and 5.1) and they aren't significant difference (P > 0.05). While, it is 6.9 in site 3. And FCR of fish in site 3 is very significant difference with site 1 and 2 (P=0.001).

The amount of fish feed is not enough and the quality of water is not good are the causes making unhealthy fish, so its FCR is higher.

The weight increasing of pigs and fish in treatment 2

This treatment the integrated model of pig and fish is used. Pig was fed with greed (agriculture by-product) and artificial feed. However, the ratio of these parts is not same one in treatment 1 (due to the dieted requirement of pig). The pig's manure is used as direct feed of fish (without any supplement). The result of research is showed in table 4.

Table 4 . Weight Increasing of raising animal in the treatment BP-PM

Site

Green feed

Artificial feed

Increase weight of animals

Total

FCR

(kg)

(kg)

(kg)

Fresh weight

DM

kg/Pig

g/Fish

4

1284

273.5

430

146.5

67.3

231.8

3.29

5

1238

263.7

430

133.6

58.4

192

3.61

6

1152

245.4

430

155.2

64.3

219.5

3.08

The data from table 4 gave us some comments:

Estimated economical efficiency of two treatments

The material exchanging into the meat of animals in the treatments is showed on table 5.

Table 5. The feed conversion ration of the treatments

Supplied feed (kg of DM)

Total weight of animals (kg)

FCR

Treatment

By-products

Artificial food

Total

BP

2071

270

2341

427

5.48

BP-PM

783

1290

2073

643

3.22

In the treatment 1 the animals were fed by most of by-products. They have very low nutrient and protein content is very lower than artificial feed, so that their FCR higher than that in treatment 2. Therefore, it is so difficult and not corrected if to compare the exchanging materials in the treatments, because of the ratio of feed of treatments were different. And our main purpose is the finding out the best way to increase farmers' income (it means that their living will be improved, too). So that, the comparing base on the economic efficiency is more suitable at all.

Table 6. Analysis economical efficiency of the treatments/Unit: VND

Items

Unit

Price

Treatment BP

Treatment BP-PM

(VND)

Quantity

Amount

Quantity

Amount

A- Inputs

1. Fingerlings of fish

fish

1,500

1,200

1,800,000

810

1,258,000

2. Breeds of pig

Pig

220

0

0

9

1,980,000

3. Cost for collection by-products

Kg

300

2070

621,000

782

234,600

4. Cost

artificial feed

Kg

2,000

270

540,000

1290

2,580,000

5. Others

-

-

-

300

-

300

Total (A)

3,261,000

6,052,600

B- Out put

1. Fish

kg

12,000

487.14

5,845,680

212.93

2,555,160

2. Pig

kg

11,500

0

0

435.2

5,004,800

Total (B)

5,845,680

7,559,960

C- Analysis economical efficiency

Treatment BP

Treatment BP-PM

1. Crude profit ( = out put - in put)

2,584,680

1,503,360

2. Efficiency of capital = (net profit/total capital) 100%

79.23

24,84

3. Internal rate of return (IRR) (1)

0.793

0.25

                                Total revenue - total cost

Note (1): IRR = ____________________________________

                                Total capital cost

- The analysis results showed that the using directly agricultural by-products in fish pond get very high efficiency in economic. In addition, the expenditure of this method is rather low. It is very suitable with the socio-economical condition of the farmers who live in removed mountain areas of Vietnam.

- The integrated pig-fish culture is get rather high profit, too. However, The profit is lower than using directly green feed for fish culture.

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

References

Le Van An 2002The status social-economical conditions of Hong Ha and Huong Nguyen commune. The final report of Upland project. Hanoi Rural publication (supported IDRC)

Nguyen Phi Nam and Nguyen Duc Binh 1998 Potential of green feed for development fish culture in Hongha commune. Period report of Upland project (supported by IDRC)

Nguyen Phi Nam 2002The results of study on developing fish culture for ethnic families in Hongha commune. Final report of Upland project. Hanoi Rural publication (supported IDRC)

FAO 1999Integrated resource management for sustainable inland fish production. Rome, Italy, 15-19 February 1999

David Little and James Muir 1987 A guide to integrated warm water aquaculture. Published by the Instuitute of Aquaculture. University of Stirling, Scotland

Hopkins K D and Cruz E M 1982 The ICLARM-CLSU integrated animal-fish farming project: final report. ICLARM