Back to content

Live stock production, climate change and resource depletion

Citation

Effect of rice distillers’ by-product on feed intake and growth performance of crossbred pigs fed mixtures of taro silage (Colocacia esculenta) and rice bran
 

Nouphone Manivanh, T R Preston* and Le Duc Ngoan**

 

Souphanouvong University (SU, Animal department.
Luang Prabang, Lao PDR
nouphone2007@yahoo.com
*Finca Ecológica, TOSOLY, UTA (Colombia)
AA #48, Socorro, Santander, Colombia
**Hue University of Agriculture & Forestry
102 Phung Hung,
Hue City, Viet Nam

 

 

Abstract

A growth trial was conducted with 16 cross-bred pigs with average 23.4 kg mean initial live weight in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), with four replications of four treatments, with one pig in each pen. The treatments were rice distillers’ residue (RD) at 0, 10, 20 and 30 percent of the diet DM in combination with Taro silage (Leaves + stems) mixed with rice bran (proportions of rice bran and Taro silage were59:40, 39:50, 24:55 and 10:59 (DM basis). Feed intake and live weight gain were increased and feed conversion improved as the percentage of rice distillers’ residue in the diet was increased (Table 1; Figures 1-4).

It is concluded that either the biological value of the protein in rice distiller's  residue is superior to that in Taro silage, or that the rice distiller's residue provides other nutrients or growth factors (eg: probiotics) that promote better growth rate and feed conversion.

Key words: Biological value, probiotics

Table 1. Effect of  rice distillers’ by-product on growth and feed conversion of growing pigs fed taro silage and rice bran

 

RD0

RD10

RD20

RD30

SEM

Prob.

Feed intake, kg/day

1445

154

1356

1346

58

0.34

Initial LW, kg

24.2

23.4

24.1

22.1

1.52

0.75

Final LW, kg

47.1b

48.8ab

54.5ab

58a

2.2

0.02

  ADG, g/day

288b

295b

374a

451a

32

0.011

  DM feed conversion

4.90

4.81

4.02

3.22

0.47

0.09

Back fat, cm

2.4

2.7

3.2

3.1

0.306

0.36 

ab Mean values within rows with different superscript letters are different at P<0.05

 

 Figure 1.  Growth curves of pigs fed different proportions of rice distillers’ residue (RD) with taro silage and rice bran Figure 2. Mean values  for live weight gain ofpigs fed different proportions of rice distillers’ residue (RD) with taro silage and rice bran
Figure 3. DM intake of pigs fed different proportions of rice distillers’ residue (RD) with taro silage and rice bran Figure 4. Mean values for DM feed conversion for pigs fed different proportions of rice distillers’ residue (RD) with taro silage and rice bran