Go to contents | |||||||||
Workshop-Seminar on Making Better Use of Local Feed Resources. SAREC-UAF, January 2000 |
Table 1. Intakes of feed ingredients (as fed, kg/day), crude protein (CP), dry matter (DM), and (calculated) metabolisable energy (ME) during the growing period. |
|||||||||
Liveweight, Kg |
Treatment |
Rice bran |
CRM |
FF |
SPL |
EGL |
Total DM, g/day |
Total CP g/day |
ME, MJ/day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-30 |
Ctrl |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
- |
1 222 |
150 |
15.1 |
|
EGL50 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
- |
0.5 |
1 246 |
148 |
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-40 |
Ctrl |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
- |
1 349 |
164 |
17.3 |
|
EGL50 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
- |
0.7 |
1 335 |
168 |
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40-50 |
Ctrl |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
- |
1 527 |
170 |
19.9 |
|
EGL50 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
- |
0.9 |
1 560 |
184 |
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50-60 |
Ctrl |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
- |
1 770 |
187 |
23.2 |
|
EGL50 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
- |
1.1 |
1 700 |
197 |
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60-70 |
Ctrl |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
- |
1 948 |
193 |
25.8 |
|
EGL50 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
- |
1.2 |
1 907 |
207 |
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70-80 |
Ctrl EGL50 |
1.0 1.0 |
1.1 0.9 |
0.3 0.2 |
1.0 - |
- 1.3 |
2 126 2 111 |
200 218 |
28.4 28.1 |
*CRM: cassava root meal; EGL: ensiled groundnut leaves; FF: fermented fish; SPL: sweet potato leaves |
Table 2. Effect of additives and ensiling time on pH of groundnut leaf silage |
||||||
|
Day 0 |
7 |
4 |
21 |
28 |
56 |
ML5 |
5.35 |
3.86 |
3.88 |
3.92 |
3.87 |
3.85 |
ML10 |
5.35 |
3.77 |
3.84 |
3.84 |
3.84 |
3.83 |
ML15 |
5.34 |
3.78 |
3.84 |
3.83 |
3.81 |
3.79 |
FCR10 |
5.64 |
4.58 |
4.58 |
4.59 |
4.47 |
4.35 |
FCR20 |
5.42 |
4.48 |
4.63 |
4.47 |
4.33 |
4.27 |
FCR30 |
5.42 |
4.5 |
4.42 |
4.27 |
4.17 |
4.17 |
* 5, 10, 15% molasses (ML) or 10, 20, 30% fresh cassava root meal (FCR) |
The pH dropped to around 4 one week after ensiling with
both molasses (ML) and fresh cassava root (FCR), but the decrease was greater
with molasses (Table 2). There were no effects of level of molasses or FRC on
the pH. All treatments produced an acceptable silage in terms of smell and
appearance.
Table 3. Effect of ensiling time on dry matter content of groundnut leaf silage |
Day 0 7 14 21 28 56 |
ML5 26.52 25.86 25.40 25.30 25.35 25.76 |
ML10 28.43 26.73 26.29 26.04 25.30 25.42 |
ML15 29.77 28.26 27.11 26.90 26.20 26.15 |
FCR10 24.85 24.13 24.10 24.12 23.80 23.21 |
FCR20 25.69 25.17 24.95 24.66 23.90 23.75 |
FCR30 26.17 25.23 25.03 24.95 24.10 24.85 |
* See abbreviations, Table 2 |
The dry matter percentages did not change materially during the ensiling period (Table 3).
Table 4. Effect of ensiling time on crude protein concentration of groundnut leaf silage |
day 0 day 7 day 14 day 21 day 28 day 56 |
ML5 17.45 18.64 17.76 17.39 16.77 16.65 |
ML10 15.31 17.62 16.66 16.71 16.41 16.72 |
ML15 14.54 16.07 16.53 16.00 16.03 16.25 |
FCR10 17.58 18.77 18.26 17.08 17.31 17.66 |
FCR20 15.13 17.28 16.27 16.14 16.36 16.72 |
FCR30 14.31 16.44 15.74 15.63 16.18 15.65 |
* See abbreviations, Table 2 |
There were no consistent changes in crude protein concentration with time of ensiling (Table 4).
|
day 0 day 7 day 14 day 21 day 28 day 56 |
ML5 37.56 37.30 35.15 35.90 36.00 36.23 |
ML10 43.87 38.42 35.59 38.54 36.10 37.20 |
ML15 49.28 40.30 35.87 39.11 40.00 40.19 |
FCR10 25.14 29.36 28.00 28.65 28.30 28.43 |
FCR20 25.71 25.26 25.97 26.50 27.32 27.35 |
FCR30 22.04 26.26 26.53 26.61 26.30 29.91 |
* See abbreviations, Table 2 |
The
measurements of dry matter soluble in water showed no consistent changes due to
ensiling time but was lower for the FCR silage than for the ML silage,
reflecting the higher fibre content of the cassava roots and also the fact that
the starch would probably remain largely insoluble, compared with the soluble
sugars in the molasses.
The feed offered per day, together with total intake for the different weight intervals, is given in Table 1. There were no treatment effects on total consumption or on ME and crude protein intakes in any of the weight intervals.
Table 6. Effect of replacing fermented fish with ensiled groundnut leaves (EGL) on the growth performance of fattening pigs. |
Traditional diet EGL50 SE |
No of pigs 20 20 |
Days in experiment 150 150 |
Initial LW (kg) 15.8 16.1 0.17 |
Final LW (kg) 77.0 79.1 0.78 |
Daily gain (g/day) 408 421 5.00 |
FCR, DM kg/kg LW 3.98 3.90 0.04 |
Feed cost/ kg gain (VND) 10138 7950 |
The treatment effects on daily gain, feed conversion and feed costs are given in Table 6. The growth performance of the pigs was not affected by replacing 50% of the crude protein of the fermented fish and sweet potato leaves with ensiled groundnut leaves, but the cost of feed/kg gain was reduced by 22%.
Ensiling is a convenient way of preserving groundnut leaves without reducing their nutritive value. Groundnut leaves ensiled with freshly ground cassava root and with molasses had low pH values, but the silage made with molasses had a higher solubility. The level of 5% molasses was sufficient for producing good quality silage, and was the cheapest and easiest treatment that can be applied on farms in Huong Van village, as molasses is readily available in the area.
Fattening pigs using ensiled groundnut leaves to replace 50% of the protein, normally provided by fermented fish, gave the same performance results as the traditional diet, but with a superior economic return. Based on these results the farmers can increase pig production and income by utilizing groundnut leaves that would otherwise be wasted.