Thirty growing Yorkshire pigs of 20 ± 1 kg live weight, individually housed, were allocated according to a completely randomized design into five different diets containing "Hem" (Rice distillers' waste) at levels of 0, 25, 50, 75 or 100% of the protein provided by fish meal, in a basal diet of rice bran and broken rice. In a parallel experiment, thirty finishing pigs (59± 2 kg) were used in a similar design to measure effects of "Hem" on performance and carcass quality.
There were no differences among the diets in any of the performance parameters in both the growing and finishing stages. Carcass quality traits were also the same on all diets.
It is concluded that in
diets for growing-finishing pigs, based on broken rice and rice bran,
"Hem" can be the sole protein supplement supporting performance levels
comparable with the use of fish meal.
In
recent years, the pig production in the
Rice distillers’ by-product is the waste when rice is fermented and then
distilled to produce alcohol in an artisan production system. Rice is
cooked and yeast is added to the cooked rice for fermentation. The alcohol is
distilled from the fermentation liquor, after which the waste “hem” is used as a
wet feed for pigs.
The rice distillers by-product ”Hem” is palatable and has a fairly high protein content (20% crude protein in dry matter) of good quality with approximately 3.9 g lysine/16 g N (Manh Huu Luu et al 2000)). In addition it is a good source of B-vitamins.
The aim of the research reported in this paper was to
determine the optimum level of rice distillers by-product ”Hem” in diets
for growing-finishing pigs.
The
study was conducted at the experimental farm of the Animal Science Department,
Thirty growing Yorkshire pigs of 20 ± 1 kg live weight were allocated according to a completely randomized design into five different diets (levels of "Hem"). The treatments were: Basal diet (control), and 4 experimental diets in which "Hem" replaced 25, 50, 75 or 100% of the protein provided by fish meal in the basal diet (details of ingredients and diets are in Tables 1, 2 and 3). In a parallel experiment, thirty finishing pigs (59± 2 kg) were used in a similar design to measure effects of "Hem" on carcass quality. All animals were individually housed. They were de-wormed and vaccinated before starting the experiments.
Table 1. The composition of the fish meal and a range of samples of “Hem” (on DM basis except for DM which is on fresh basis) |
||||||||
|
DM |
Ash |
CP |
EE |
CF |
NFE |
Ca |
P |
Fish meal |
87.3 |
40.2 |
46.8 |
7.36 |
3.35 |
2.31 |
6.41 |
4.71 |
”Hem”# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean |
7.96 |
3.69 |
22.9 |
8.37 |
14.6 |
50.5 |
0.49 |
0.47 |
Minimum |
3.35 |
0.39 |
15.2 |
4 |
1.43 |
21.2 |
0.11 |
0.17 |
Maximum |
12.9 |
8.84 |
33.6 |
17.5 |
43.8 |
46.9 |
0.86 |
0.89 |
# data based on 32 samples |
Table 2. The formulation of the diets (% in DM) for the growing and finishing phases |
|||||
|
Control |
Hem25 |
Hem50 |
Hem75 |
Hem100 |
Growing phase |
|
|
|
|
|
Rice bran |
52.5 |
50.1 |
47.8 |
45.4 |
43 |
Broken rice |
30 |
28.6 |
27.2 |
25.8 |
24.5 |
Fish meal |
15 |
11.3 |
7.5 |
3.8 |
- |
”Hem” |
- |
7.5 |
15 |
22.5 |
30 |
Minerals |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
Finishing phase |
|
|
|
|
|
Rice bran |
55.5 |
54 |
52.5 |
51 |
49.5 |
Broken rice |
32 |
31 |
30 |
29 |
28 |
Fish meal |
10 |
7.5 |
5 |
2.5 |
- |
”Hem” |
- |
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
Minerals |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
Table 3. The composition of the diets in the growing and finishing stages (on DM basis except for DM which is on fresh basis) |
||||||||
|
DM |
Ash |
CP |
EE |
CF |
NFE |
Ca |
P |
Growing phase |
||||||||
Control |
84.37 |
11.20 |
17.23 |
8.68 |
7.06 |
53.34 |
1.44 |
1.61 |
Hem25 |
78.46 |
9.76 |
16.74 |
8.69 |
7.72 |
54.59 |
1.66 |
1.48 |
Hem50 |
72.54 |
8.28 |
16.23 |
8.70 |
8.40 |
55.89 |
1.44 |
1.30 |
Hem75 |
66.63 |
6.83 |
15.74 |
8.71 |
9.07 |
57.14 |
1.21 |
1.12 |
Finishing phase |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Control |
84.33 |
9.49 |
15.50 |
8.75 |
7.27 |
56.49 |
1.60 |
1.48 |
Hem25 |
80.39 |
8.52 |
15.17 |
8.76 |
7.72 |
57.32 |
1.45 |
1.36 |
Hem50 |
76.44 |
7.55 |
14.84 |
8.78 |
8.18 |
58.15 |
1.30 |
1.24 |
Hem75 |
72.50 |
6.58 |
14.50 |
8.79 |
8.63 |
58.98 |
1.15 |
1.12 |
Hem100 |
68.56 |
5.61 |
14.17 |
8.81 |
9.09 |
59.81 |
0.99 |
1.00 |
"Hem" was purchased every day from a local rice wine producer. Fish meal, rice bran and broken rice were purchased at the same time from a local feed company. The control diets were formulated to contain 17% of crude protein in DM in the growing and 15% in the finishing stage. The daily allowance was set at 4% of live weight given in two feeds at 9:00 and 14:00 h. Refusals were recorded every meal to measure feed intake. Water was available throughout the experiment.
The pigs were weighed every 3 weeks and two pigs of each treatment (finishing phase) were slaughtered to measure carcass quality at the end of the trial. Feed ingredients and diets were analysed for proximate composition by AOAC (1984) procedures.
Feed samples were analysed in duplicate for dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ash, ether extract (EE) according to the standard procedures (AOAC 1984).
All data were analysed by analysis of variance using the General Linear Model option of the Minitab software (version 13).The model used was the following:
Xi = μ + Ti + e where,
Xi is the individual observation, μ the overall mean, Ti treatment effect (i=1 - 4) and e is residual error. If the treatment effect was significant (P<0.05), differences between means were tested with the Tukey procedure of the Minitab software.
There were no differences in any of the performance parameters between the diets (Table 5).
Table 5. Mean values for weigh gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio for growing and finishing pigs fed increasing levels of “Hem” as replacement for fish meal (protein basis) |
||||||
|
Control |
Hem25 |
Hem50 |
Hem75 |
Hem100 |
Prob. |
Growing phase |
||||||
Live weight, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
20.1 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
20.0 |
|
Daily gain |
0.536 |
0.542 |
0.558 |
0.569 |
0.558 |
0.58 |
Feed intake, kg/day |
||||||
Total DM |
1.57 |
1.59 |
1.64 |
1.59 |
1.65 |
|
Hem DM |
0 |
0.12 |
0.25 |
0.36 |
0.51 |
|
Hem, fresh basis |
0 |
1.49 |
3.09 |
4.49 |
6.41 |
|
Feed DM conversion |
2.93 |
2.94 |
2.95 |
2.80 |
2.97 |
0.83 |
Feed cost, VND/kg live weight gain |
7,594 |
6,778 |
6,023 |
5,246 |
5,398 |
|
Finishing phase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Live weight, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
59.58 |
60.83 |
58.42 |
59 |
58.1 |
|
Final |
89.16 |
90.33 |
87.25 |
87.5 |
87.25 |
|
Daily gain |
0.580 |
0.571 |
0.560 |
0.550 |
0.570 |
0.55 |
Feed intake, kg/day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DM |
2.13 |
2.10 |
2.20 |
2.04 |
2.25 |
0.64 |
Hem DM |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.22 |
0.31 |
0.45 |
|
Hem, fresh basis |
0.00 |
1.32 |
2.77 |
3.85 |
5.65 |
|
Feed DM conversion |
3.67 |
3.67 |
3.92 |
3.73 |
3.69 |
0.84 |
Feed cost, VND/kg live weight gain |
7833 |
7577 |
7699 |
7303 |
6854 |
|
The results indicate that the protein quality of "Hem" is comparable with that of the local fish meal, and that it can therefore replace completely the fishmeal in diets for growing / fattening pigs. However, the quality of Hem is quite good, as the mean lysine content was found to be 3.91g/16g N (Manh Huu Luu et al 2000). Some studies have been carried out by Harmon (1974, 1975) and Cromwell et al 1993) indicating that distiller’s dried grain with solubles (DDGS) was a good source of lysine for swine. The fact that local farmers use rice bran supplemented with "Hem" as the sole diet for pigs also indicates that the protein quality of "Hem" is high.
There were no apparent differences in carcass traits for
pigs receiving the different levels of "Hem" (Table 6), which is is line with
the good results for the performance traits.
Table 6. Carcass characteristics of slaughter pigs |
||||||
|
Control |
Hem25 |
Hem50 |
Hem75 |
Hem100 |
|
Slaughter weight, kg |
89 |
84 |
89 |
80 |
93 |
|
Carcass weight, kg |
73.85 |
69.75 |
72.4 |
62.2 |
77.05 |
|
Carcass, % |
82.9 |
78 |
81.3 |
77.75 |
82.84 |
|
Carcass length, cm |
79.6 |
80.1 |
78.3 |
81 |
82 |
|
Loin eye area, cm2 |
42.3 |
40.6 |
40.3 |
42.6 |
47.5 |
|
Backfat thickness, cm |
2.02 |
2.7 |
2.02 |
2.28 |
2.58 |
|
|
Weights of organs, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heart |
0.34 |
0.38 |
0.41 |
0.38 |
0.43 |
|
Lung |
1.57 |
1.43 |
1.71 |
1.44 |
1.34 |
|
Liver |
1.80 |
1.79 |
1.71 |
2.06 |
1.61 |
|
Spleen |
0.34 |
0.24 |
0.27 |
0.31 |
0.22 |
|
Stomach |
0.67 |
0.83 |
0.82 |
0.94 |
0.75 |
|
Kidney |
0.17 |
0.18 |
0.14 |
0.19 |
0.16 |
|
Small intestine |
2.58 |
2.38 |
2.74 |
2.13 |
2.04 |
|
Large intestine |
2.08 |
2.26 |
2.74 |
2.75 |
1.94 |
This research was partially financed by the bilateral SAREC project 2000-2002.
AOAC 1984 Official Methods of
Analysis. Association of Official
Analytical Chemists,
Cromwell G L, Herkleman K L and Stahly T S 1993 Physical, chemical, and nutritional characteristics of distiller’s dried grains with solubles for chicks and pigs. J. Ani. Sci. 71:679-686.
Harmon B G 1974 Availability studies of lysine and tryptophan in distillers dried grains with solubles for swine. Distillers Feed Conference proceedings 29:35.
Harmon B G 1975 The use of distillers dried grains with solubles as a source of lysine for swine. Distillers Feed Conference Proceedings 23:30.
Luu Huu Manh, Tran Chi Binh, Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung, Bui Phan Thu Hang 2000 Composition and nutritive value of rice distillers’ by-product (hem) for smallholder pig production.(Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle). Sustainable Livestock Production on Local Feed Resources. Proceedings Final Seminar- Workshop. HUAF, Sida-SAREC. http://www.mekarn.org/sarec03/manhcantho3.htm