A total of 60 sheep with an initial weight of 16 to 21 kg and ages ranging between 4.5 and 5 months were allocated to 6 treatments: untreated rice straw (control); rice straw + 20% molasses; rice straw + 1% urea; rice straw + 1% urea + 20% molasses\; urea-treated rice straw; urea-treated rice straw + 20% molasses. Measurements were made of in vitro gas production of the straws and the growth and feed conversion of the sheep fed the different types of rice straw ad libitum plus 125 g/day dry cassava roots and 125 g/day rice bran.
Rate of gas production was increased by treating the straw with urea (a+b = 57.3 ml vs 39.8 ml for urea-treated and untreated straw). Adding molasses to the untreated straw increased the intake from 150 to 310 g DM/day. Adding molasses to the rice straw plus urea treatment increased the intake from 168 to 362 g DM/day but molasses addition had no effect on intake of the urea-treated straw (269 and 273 g DM/day. The sheep lost weight on untreated straw without (-11 g/day) or with molasses (-2 g/day). Best performance was with urea-treated rice straw plus molasses (37 g/day), which was better than urea-treated straw without molasses (15 g/day). Untreated straw with added urea and molasses supported a growth rate of 25 g/day. Feed conversion data were in the same order as the growth rates.
It can be concluded that urea-treatment plus supplementary molasses is the best way to offer rice straw to growing sheep.
Sheep
have been raised in the Phan Rang area in central
Spraying urea on the straw or ensiling the straw with urea (urea-treatment) are the common methods of increasing the nutritive value. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods, with or without supplementary molasses, as the basal diet for growing sheep.
When rice straw is treated with urea, the nutritive value and gas production will be improved.
Addition of 20 % of molasses to
rice straw treated, or supplemented, with urea in the diet will increase feed intake and live
weight gain of growing sheep
Two rumen-fistulated cows were used to
collect rumen fluid. They were fed close to their energy maintenance feeding
level with a diet consisting of grasses and concentrate. Rumen fluid was
collected 2 h after the morning feeding into a pre-warmed thermos filled with
CO2 and was strained and filtered through cheese-cloth and mixed (1:2
v/v) with an anaerobic buffer/mineral solution.
OMD (%)=24.91 + 0.7222GP + 0.0815CP
A completely randomized design was used with 60 sheep (initial weight 16 to 21 kg; age 4.5 to 5 months) allocated to the following six treatments (6 males and 4 females per treatment):
RS: Untreated rice straw (control)
RSM: Rice straw + 20% molasses
RSU: Rice straw + 1% urea
RSMU: Rice straw + 1% urea + 20% molasses
UTRS: Urea-treated rice straw (2.5% urea; 0.5% lime; 0.5% salt)
UTRSM: Urea-treated rice straw + 20% molasses
In addition to the rice straw, the sheep were given 125 g/day of dry cassava roots and 125 g/day of rice bran. The rice straw was chopped into pieces from 4 to 7 cm length before feeding or processing. Urea-treated rice straw was prepared by using 2.5 kg urea + 0.5 kg lime + 0.5 kg salt, mixing with 100 kg rice straw and 100 kg water then covering for 10 days before feeding. The urea-supplemented rice straw was prepared by spraying the rice straw, prior to feeding, with a solution of 1 kg urea + 100 kg water per 100 kg rice straw. The rice straw was fed ad libitum. For treatments RS and RSM, water was mixed with the straw to give a similar dry matter content as for the other treatments. The sheep were weighed at the beginning and every 10 days after the experiment started.
Samples of feeds offered and refused were taken daily, dried at 60 ºC and stored. Every 4 weeks the samples were analysed for DM and crude protein according to the standard methods of AOAC (1990). NDF and ADF were determined by the methods of Van Soest et al (1991).
The data from the experiments were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (Minitab 1998). The treatment means which showed significant differences at the probability level of P<0.05 were compared using the Fisher pair-wise comparisons procedure. The model used in the analysis of the data from the feeding trial was:
Y = m+ T + e
where Y = the dependent
variable,
m
= the general mean, T = the effect of the
treatment and e = the random error effect.
The straw that was supplemented (RSU), or treated (UTRS and UTRSM), with urea had almost twice the level of crude protein as the untreated (RS)\ or molasses-supplemented straw (RSM) (Table 1).
Table 1: Chemical composition of the feed components |
|||||
|
DM (g/kg) |
% of DM |
|||
CP |
Ash |
NDF |
ADF |
||
RS |
444 |
3.6 |
15.4 |
72.6 |
45.9 |
RSM |
499 |
4.1 |
14.8 |
60.2 |
34.3 |
RSU |
444 |
6.9 |
15.5 |
71.6 |
41.2 |
RSUM |
495 |
6.2 |
14.3 |
61.8 |
36.8 |
UTRS |
467 |
7.1 |
16.0 |
74 |
40.3 |
UTRSM |
506 |
6.9 |
13.7 |
56.7 |
35.4 |
Rates of gas production after 72 and 96 h were higher for UTRS than for RS (Table 2) resulting in a 22% increase in the predicted organic matter digestibility (Table 3).
Table 2: Gas production (ml) per 200 mg DM of RS and UTRS |
|||||||
|
Time, h |
||||||
3 |
6 |
12 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
96 |
|
RS |
0.66 |
0.79 |
2.11 |
11.1 |
23.5 |
28.8 |
32.1 |
URS |
0.71 |
1.00 |
2.70 |
14.0 |
30.3 |
35.1 |
37.0 |
SE |
0.36 |
0.39 |
0.55 |
0.63 |
0.41 |
0.35 |
0.65 |
Prob. |
0.92 |
0.71 |
0.64 |
0.36 |
0.26 |
0.003 |
0.01 |
Table 3: Gas production characteristics of RS and UTRS and predicted organic matter digestibility |
|||||||
|
a |
b |
a+b |
c |
Lag time, h |
RSD |
OMD (%) |
RS |
-3.7 |
44.3 |
39.8 |
0.0182 |
5.6 |
1.94 |
57.2 |
UTRS |
-3.2 |
61.2 |
57.3 |
0.0121 |
5.7 |
1.74 |
69.7 |
Addition of molasses, but not of urea, increased the intake of untreated straw DM (Table 4). Addition of molasses had no effect on DM intake when the straw was treated with urea and lime. The sheep lost live weight on untreated rice straw or untreated straw supplemented with molasses (Figure 1). They maintained weight on the straw supplemented with urea and lime. Growth rates were improved when the rice straw was supplemented with urea plus molasses (25 g/day) and was highest for urea-treated rice straw plus molasses (37 g/day). Straw treated with urea/lime supported a growth rate of 15 g/day. The best feed conversion was with urea-treated straw supplemented with molasses.
Table 4: Mean values for feed intake, live weight change and feed conversion |
||||||||
|
RS |
RSM |
RSU |
RSUM |
UTRS |
UTRSM |
SE |
|
Feed DM intake, g/day |
||||||||
Rice straw |
150a |
309b |
168a |
362d |
269c |
273c |
6.99 |
|
Cassava |
124 |
124 |
124 |
124 |
124 |
124 |
0.14 |
|
Rice bran |
124 |
122 |
124 |
115 |
125 |
119 |
0.92 |
|
|
399 a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
16.9 |
20.7 |
16.8 |
16.1 |
19.4 |
19.2 |
1.74 |
|
|
15.5 |
20.5 |
16.8 |
19.3 |
21.4 |
23.9 |
1.89 |
|
|
-11 a |
-2 a |
0 a |
25 b |
15 ab |
37 b |
6.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
24.8 |
34.7 |
13.5 |
1.64 |
|
|
Figure 1:
Changes in live weight of sheep fed untreated rice straw supplemented with urea
or molasses
or urea-treated rice straw with or without molasses
Treatment of rice straw with urea/lime, or supplementation of untreated rice straw with urea and molasses, were necessary in order to support positive growth rates in sheep.
AOAC 1990 Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis K Helrick, ed) 13th edition. Arlington pp 1018
Chenost M and Kayouli C 1997 Roughage utilization in warm climates. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 135. FAO: Rome
Liu J, Chen Z, Yu J Q, Fei B R, Wang W D and Zhang J F 1998 Effect of ammonium bicarbonate treatment and rapeseed meal supplementation on growth rate of Huzhou lambs receiving rice straw. Livestock Research for Rural Development (10) 2: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd10/2/liu102.htm
McDonald E 1981 A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96:251-252
Menke K H, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D and Schneider W 1979 The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93:217-222
Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3583-3593