The study includes a survey and two growth trials concerned with the production and usage of rubber seed meal (RSM) in diets for growing colored feather chickens. The survey was carried out in three rubber producing districts of SE Vietnam, and showed that the production of RSM is increasing rapidly, although farmers only include small amounts (up to 7% of the diet) in rations for chickens because of concerns over possible toxic effects. In the first growth trial, diets containing 0 (RS0), 10 (RS10), 20 (RS20), 30 (RS30), 40 (RS40) or 50% (RS50) rubber seed meal were given to scavenging native chickens from 1 to 128 days of age.
Average daily weight gains were 10.8, 10.6, 9.69, 11.9, 11.6 and 9.25g/day, and survival rates 86.4, 94.4, 90.1, 65.5 and 39.0 % for the RS0, RS10, RS20, RS30, RS40 and RS50 diets, respectively. In the second trial, levels of 0, 5 or 10% RSM were included in diets for confined Tam hoang chickens from 1 to 70 days of age. There were no treatment effects (P>0.05) on average daily gain, feed conversion or survival rates. It was concluded that up to 30% RSM can be included in diets for scavenging native chickens, and up to 10% RSM in diets for confined Tam hoang chickens.
In recent
years poultry production has developed rapidly in
In South-Eastern Vietnam, there are
large amounts of rubber seed meal (RSM) available. This is a by-product of oil
extraction from rubber seed. It has a medium protein level but is high in fiber
and prussic acid (HCN) which is toxic to animals. RSM has been used for a long time to feed livestock at various levels
in diets for monogastrics, but little of
this work has been published. Results of studies
on RSM are inconsistent, depending on the kind of diet (for example, for pigs
or chickens), season of the year, kind of RSM (with hull or dehulled), and
sometimes concerning the perception of the farmers.
For RSM to be used as an
ingredient in diets for chickens, studies need to be done to review the
production, processing and chemical composition of the rubber seed meal, as well as to determine
its effect on the growth, feed efficiency and economics of chicken production
under practical conditions.
The study had the following objectives:
To assess the production of rubber seed meal in South Eastern Vietnam, especially in Dong Nai and Tay Ninh provinces, areas with a high concentration of rubber tree plantations.
To determine the most suitable level of rubber seed meal inclusion in diets for colored chickens, and whether rubber seed meal is toxic to colored chickens at high inclusion rates (up to 40%) in the diet.
To evaluate the economical efficiency of using rubber seed meal in colored chicken diets.
Materials and
methods
To achieve the
above objectives a study was conducted from 1998 to 2000
in provinces in
The
survey was carried out in three
areas: Thong Nhat district in Dong Nai province; Trang Bang district in Tay
Ninh province and Cu Chi district in
During the survey, representative samples of
rubber seed meals were also collected, based on processing technique, physical
form and location where produced. These samples were taken for proximate
analysis and HCN determination at the Department of
Two hundred and fifty day-old native chicks were allocated into five treatments, with five replicates per treatment as a Complete Random Design. The chicks were kept in cages.
The birds in treatment RS40 were divided into two groups: one continued on diet RS40 and the other was given a diet with 50% rubber seed meal (RS50). In this phase, the chicks were raised on the floor, with only one replicate per treatment.
The rubber seed meal used in the trial was purchased from Dong Nai province and was not processed before being incorporated in the diets. Metabolisable energy (ME), calcium and phosphorus were kept equal among treatments while crude protein and most amino acids increased with increasing level of rubber seed meal in the diets. The composition and nutritive value of diets are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Composition and nutritive value of experimental diets containing rubber
seed meal (RSM) (Trial 1 |
|||||
Ingredients (%) |
RS0 |
RS10 |
RS20 |
RS30 |
RS40 |
Yellow maize |
64.5 |
61.9 |
53.0 |
24.5 |
20.0 |
Groundnut cake |
19.9 |
20.7 |
21.4 |
11.2 |
17.3 |
Soybean, full fat |
10.1 |
1.56 |
1.16 |
11.1 |
5.51 |
Fish meal 45 |
3.56 |
3.96 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
3.37 |
Oyster shell |
1.20 |
1.18 |
1.30 |
1.47 |
1.31 |
Salt |
0.32 |
0.32 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
0.33 |
Mineral premix |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
DL-Methionine |
0.09 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0 |
0 |
DicalPhosphate |
0 |
0 |
0.49 |
0.33 |
0.11 |
Rice bran |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18.8 |
40.0 |
RSM |
0 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
30.0 |
40.0 |
Composition, % in DM |
|||||
Crude protein |
20.0 |
20.0 |
21.2 |
23.3 |
26.3 |
Crude fiber |
3.92 |
4.46 |
5.14 |
5.13 |
6.00 |
Lysine |
1.10 |
1.02 |
1.00 |
1.05 |
1.18 |
Met + Cys |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.86 |
Threonine |
0.77 |
0.76 |
0.78 |
0.84 |
0.95 |
Tryptophan |
0.24 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
Calcium |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
Available P |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
Measurements of live weight, average daily gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio, survival rate and economic efficiency were made every four weeks.
At present, farmers tend to raise Tam
hoang chickens in confinement, similar to broiler production. As in Trial 1,
200 Tam hoang chicks were allocated to three dietary treatments with a CRD
design: Control; 5% RSM and 10% RSM. The RSM
used was dehulled and processed by heating.
Table 2.
Composition and nutritive value of experimental diets (Trial
2 |
|||||||
|
Starter |
Grower and Finisher |
|||||
|
Control |
RS5 |
RS10 |
Control |
RS5 |
RS10 |
|
Yellow maize |
47.0 |
41.8 |
44.7 |
59.0 |
58.0 |
56.0 |
|
Groundnut cake |
10.0 |
10.2 |
2.30 |
10.0 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
|
Soybean, full fat |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
7.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
|
Fish meal 45 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
|
Soybean oil
meal |
11.5 |
11.5 |
11.5 |
3.0 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
|
Premix |
1.50 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Rice bran |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
|
Rubber seed meal |
0 |
5.00 |
10.0 |
0.00 |
5.00 |
10.0 |
|
Nutrient content (estimated), % |
|||||||
Crude protein |
20.8 |
21.6 |
22.0 |
17.2 |
17.5 |
17.7 |
|
Calcium |
0.85 |
0.83 |
0.82 |
0.78 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
|
Available P |
0.40 |
0.41 |
0.43 |
0.34 |
0.35 |
0.37 |
Rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) grow well in bazan soils, and hence they are mainly planted in only four provinces of Vietnam: Dong Nai, Tay Ninh, Binh Duong and Binh Phuoc, and a part of Ho Chi Minh City. Production of rubber has increased rapidly during the last ten years, from 58,000 metric tons in 1990 to 291,000 tons in 2000 (FAO 2001). The total area of rubber trees has also increased and is projected to reach around 700,000 ha in 2005 (Institute of Rubber Tree Research in Vietnam 1997).
The rubber tree begins to produce fruit at 4 years of age. A fruit contains 3 to 4 seeds, which consist of a hard shell, which is brown or black with some white spots, and a soft white kernel. The proportion of the kernel is about 51% of the total weight of the seed. The soft kernel is used to produce oil, and the by-product is rubber seed meal (RSM). A hectare of rubber trees gives 300 to 400 kg of seed per year (Gohl 1981). Average rubber seed meal produced is about 60 to 70% of total seed weight. Therefore, one hectare of mature rubber trees produces 180 to 280 kg of RSM. Rubber oil is the raw material for the production of savon, paint and lubricant.
The technique for processing of the
rubber seeds to produce rubber oil and RSM was described in detail by Nguyen
Quang Thieu (2001). Generally RSM is produced by mechanical processes and is
not extracted, and usually contains 5 to 10% of tiny shell particles. These could
damage the epithelial cells in digestive tract of swine. Fortunately, the
chicken has a gizzard to grind and help to digest hard objects.
Farmers close to the location of RSM
production have included RSM in diets for chickens and also pigs for
a ong time.
According to these producers pigs can tolerate only about 7% of RSM in the diet
due to the toxicity of the RSM. Even though farmers do not know exactly what
the toxin is, the symtoms they describe indicate that the cause is probably
HCN, as reported in the literature. The farmers reported that scavenging
chickens do not show any serious symptoms of toxicity. However, consumers are
often afraid of being poisoned through eating chickens which had been fed diets
with RSM. This perception results in farmers not revealing the fact that they
really feed their chickens diets with RSM. According to some RSM producers,
even feed mills purchase RSM to mix into their complete feeds, but they never
reveal this to the public.
Final live weights and mean daily live weight gains were not affected by including up 40% RSM in the diets, but the 50% level of RSM inclusion did result in markedly lower weight gains (Table 3). However, the most serious effect of high levels of RSM was on survival rate, which fell from over 90% for the RS30 diet to 65 and 39% for the RS40 and RS50 diets, respectively (Table 4).
Table 3. Effects of RSM on live weight changes and average weight gain of chickens during different growth phases |
||||||
|
RS0 |
RS10 |
RS20 |
RS30 |
RS40 |
RS50 |
Live weight (g)
Initial weight
at 45 days
at 72 days
at 100 days
at 128 days |
33.8
293
656
1109
1418 |
34.0
308
582
1055
1396 |
34.4
308
579
986
1275 |
34.4
299
682
1238
1557 |
33.8
270
673
1211
1517 |
34.1
195
498
944
1218 |
Average gain (g/day)
0-45
days
0-72
days
0-100
days
0-128
days |
5.77 8.65 10.75 10.81 |
6.08 7.61 10.21 10.64 |
6.08 7.57 9.52 9.69 |
5.89 9.01 12.03 11.90 |
5.25 8.88 11.77 11.59 |
3.58 6.45 9.10 9.25 |
Table 4. Effect of RSM level on culled and mortality rates ( %) |
||||||
|
RS0 |
RS10 |
RS20 |
RS30 |
RS40 |
RS50 |
Period 1 – 72 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortality |
6.0 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
4.00 |
23.6 |
26.0 |
Culled |
4.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
3.60 |
4.79 |
Period 73 – 128 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortality |
0.0 |
0.00 |
3.57 |
3.57 |
3.70 |
14.0 |
Culled |
3.57 |
3.57 |
3.57 |
0.00 |
3.57 |
16.1 |
Whole period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortality |
6.0 |
2.00 |
5.57 |
7.57 |
27.3 |
40.0 |
Culled |
7.57 |
3.57 |
3.57 |
2.00 |
7.17 |
20.9 |
Survived |
86.4 |
94.4 |
90.9 |
90.4 |
65.5 |
39.0 |
The chicks remained healthy throughout the trial, and as is clearly indicated there were no effects of inclusion of 5 or 10% RSM on daily gains, feed conversion or mortality (Table 5).
Table 5. Effects of RSM on live weight changes and average weight gain of confined Tam Hoang chickens during different growth phases |
|||
|
Control |
RS5 |
RS10 |
Live weight (g) at
28
days at
70
days |
550 1700 |
570 1829 |
554 1747 |
Average daily weight gain (g/day) 0-28
days 0-70 days |
17.9 27.5 |
18.7 28.2 |
18.1 27.4 |
Feed conversion ratio, kg feed/kg gain 0-28
days 0-70 days |
2.91 3.55 |
2.87 3.56 |
3.00 3.66 |
Survival rate (%) |
92.8 |
93.9 |
91.9 |
Conclusions
The results of the growth trials show that up to
30% RSM can be included in diets for scavenging native chickens, and up to 10%
in diets for confined improved (Tam hoang) growers.
This research was partially financed by the bilateral SAREC project 2000-2002.
References
FAO
2001 Selected indicators of food and agriculture development in Asia-Pacific
region, 1990-2000. Regional office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok.
Gohl B 1981 Tropical Feeds. FAO, Rome http://www.fao.org/ag/AGA/AGAP/FRG/afris/default.htm
Nguyen Quoc Thieu
2001
Evaluation of rubber seed meal in diets of local chickens. MSc
thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences