Two experiments were carried out to investigate nutrient contents and in vitro digestibility values of rice straw after it's use to cultivate mushrooms and to evaluate the effect of rice straw enriched by urea, molasses and minerals on in vivo digestibility and nutrient intake of cattle. In Experiment 1 a complete randomised design was used for the in sacco evaluation of rice straw at three stages: initial (R), at 20 days treated with water (RW20) and after harvesting mushrooms (MS). There were 8 replicates of each treatment. Faeces of a Murrah buffalo were used as inoculant. In Experiment 2, four Red Sindhi crossbred cattle (138 ± 12 kg) were allocated in a 4 x 4 Latin Square design to four diets, which included rice straw (R), rice straw plus urea-molasses-mineral mixture (RS+UMM), urea-treated rice straw (URS) and urea-treated rice straw plus molasses-mineral mixture (URS+MM).
The crude protein and ash in MS was higher and NDF lower than in R and RW20. In vitro digestibility values at 24 h were similar but were lower for MS at 96 h. The MS after drying was dark, dusty and had a bad smell and was not palatable to cattle.
In Experiment 2, adding urea, molasses and minerals to rice straw, or molasses and minerals to urea-treated rice straw, increased intake, DM in vivo digestibility and N retention.
The
Another approach to improving rice straw quality is to supplement it with molasses, urea and minerals (Thu and Udén, 2000).
This study, therefore, aimed to investigate: (i) the nutrient content and in vitro digestibility values of the residue from straw used to grow
mushroom; and (ii)
and effect of
supplementing rice straw with urea, molasses and minerals.
A complete randomized design was used to evaluate the nutritive value of rice straw used for growing mushrooms. Samples for analysis and in vitro digestibility were taken at the initial stage (R), at 20 days after treatment with water (RW20) and after harvesting the mushroom (MS). There were eight replicates (batches of straw used for growing the mushrooms). Samples were analysed for DM, N and NDF by AOAC (1990) procedures and used to measure organic matter degradability by the in sacco method using faeces from Murrah buffalos fed natural grasses as inoculant (Thu and Udén 2003).
In the Exp.2
four Red Sindhi crossbred cattle (138 ± 12kg) were allocated in a 4 x 4 Latin
Square design with four diets: rice straw (RS), rice straw
with added urea-molasses-mineral mixture (RS+UMM), urea-treated rice straw (URS)
and urea-treated rice straw plus molasses-mineral mixture (URS+MM). Each experimental period was three weeks,
including one week for adaptation. Feeds were offered twice a day at
In both experiments feed samples were dried at 105oC overnight to determine dry matter (DM).
The
In Experiment 1, the data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of Minitab (1998). When the F test was significant (P<0.05), Tukey’s test for paired comparisons was used. The data from in vitro degradability were fitted to a non-linear model (Ørskov et al 1980):
DMD= a + b (1- e-ct ),
where DMD = DM
disappeared after time (t), a = the intercept on the "y" axis, c= fractional degradation rate (h-1) and a+b = the curve asymptote
representing the potential degradability. The Table Curve 2D V4 program (Table Curve 2D V4 1987) was used for curve
fitting. In Experiment 2 data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the
General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of Minitab (1998).
The cultivation of mushrooms reduced the organic matter and NDF content of the straw but increased the crude protein content (Table 1).
Table 1. Changes in composition of rice straw during the cultivation of mushrooms (on DM basis except for DM which is as % of fresh matter) |
||||
|
Initial |
After 20 day |
After harvest |
Prob. |
|
91.8a |
24.8b |
23.5b |
0.001 |
OM |
86.7a |
86.6a |
80.2b |
0.01 |
CP |
6.30a |
6.93a |
9.23b |
0.001 |
NDF
|
56.8a |
57.3a |
43.8b |
0.01 |
ADF |
42.2 |
42.8 |
45.7 |
0.01 |
Ash |
13.3a |
13.4a |
19.8b |
0.01 |
ab Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05 |
The OM degradability of the straw after mushroom cultivation was reduced after 96 h of incubation (Table 2) with no apparent changes at earlier times. After drying the final product it was dark in colour, dusty and had a bad smell. When it was offered to cattle they ate very little. There appeared to be no relationship between the degradation parameters "a", "b" and "c" and the measured degradability values. No changes in degradability are to be expected due to addition of water to the straw, and this was the case according to the degradation values even at 96h, yet the "b" values were 30% less for this treatment according to the fitted curve parameter. Also the "c" value was higher for the residue after mushroom growing, than for the original straw, which is also in conflict with the observed values for OM loss and 96h degradability.
Table 2. In vitro OM digestibility values (%) of rice straw during cultivation of mushrooms |
|||||
Incubation time, h |
Initial |
After 20
days |
After harvest |
P |
|
0 |
22.2 |
22.1 |
24.2 |
ns |
|
12 |
31.8 |
27.9 |
32.6 |
ns |
|
24 |
34.2 |
33.2 |
37.3 |
ns |
|
48 |
41.2 |
44.8 |
40.7 |
ns |
|
72 |
44.6 |
47.0 |
44.1 |
ns |
|
96 |
55.0a |
55.0a |
48.7b |
0.01 |
|
Parameters of degradation curve |
|||||
a |
24.4 |
21.9 |
25.1 |
|
|
b |
60.0 |
46.6 |
24.1 |
|
|
a + b |
84.4 |
68.5 |
49.2 |
|
|
c |
0.0068 |
0.0123 |
0.0259 |
|
|
ab Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05 |
Table 3. Composition of rice straw and supplemented rice straw in Experiment 2 (on DM basis except for DM which is as % of fresh matter) |
||||
|
RS |
RS+UMM |
URS |
URS+MM |
DM |
57.7 |
60.5 |
64.0 |
65.9 |
OM |
83.9 |
84.7 |
83.7 |
84.3 |
CP |
7.43 |
12.5 |
11.3 |
11.2 |
NDF |
49.4 |
41.2 |
48.8 |
41.2 |
ADF |
50.9 |
49.4 |
57.5 |
59.3 |
Ash |
16.1 |
15.3 |
16.4 |
15.6 |
The rice straw intake was increased by supplementation with molasses / minerals and by treatment with urea (Table 4), with highest values for the urea-treated straw supplemented with molasses and minerals. The high intake of crude protein on this latter diet was due to the increased DM intake,m as both diets had the same concentration of crude protein (Table 3).
Table 4.
Intake of rice straw, water, and crude protein and urine production of
young cattle in Experiment 2. |
|||||
|
RS |
RS+UMM |
URS |
URS+MM |
Prob. |
Rice straw (kg DM/day) |
2.22a |
3.03b |
3.0b |
3.71c |
0.001 |
Rice straw (g/kg LW/day) |
15.2a |
20.5b |
20.7b |
25.3c |
0.05 |
Drinking water (kg/day) |
8.5a |
11.5c |
10.2b |
11.1b |
0.001 |
Urine (kg/day) |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
ns |
Crude protein
(g/day) |
162a |
381c |
341b |
417d |
0.001 |
ab Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05 |
DM and
Table 5. In vivo digestibility coefficients (%) for DM, OM and NDF and nitrogen retention of young cattle in Experiment 2 |
|||||
|
RS
|
RS+UMM |
URS
|
URS+MM |
Prob. |
DM |
43.2a |
47.8ab |
53.4ab |
57.0b |
0.05 |
OM |
39.9a |
43.6ab |
48.8ab |
51.3b |
0.05 |
NDF |
55.5ab |
50.9a |
68.5c |
63.8bc |
0.01 |
N retention (% of N intake |
9.45a |
42.0b |
39.6b |
43.7b |
0.05 |
abc Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05 |
The lack of difference in N retention between urea-supplemented (untreated) rice straw and urea-treated rice straw, when molasses / minerals were also fed, emphasis the importance of testing the two strategies in feeding trials to measure animal performance traits, since it is more economical and simpler to supplement the straw with urea than to "treat" it with urea.
It appears that the residue from rice straw after mushroom cultivation is of lower nutritive value (contains 50% more ash) than the original straw and is likely to be of negligible feeding value for cattle
Addition of molasses and minerals to untreated rice straw supported the same N retention in cattle as when these supplements were added to urea-treated rice straw
There is a need to test the two strategies (molasses/minerals/urea supplementation of rice straw versus molasses/minerals supplementation of urea-treated rice straw) in feeding trials with growing cattle.
This research was partially financed by the bilateral SAREC 2000-2002 project.
AOAC
1980 Official Methods
of Analysis. 13th edn.
Association of Official Analytical Chemist.
Chowdhury S A and Huque K S 1998 Effect of molasses or rice gruel inclusion to urea supplemented rice straw on its intake, nutrient digestibilities, microbial N yield, N balance and growth rate of native (Bos indicus) growing bulls. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 1998. Vol. 11, 145-151.
McDonald
P, Edwards
R A, Greenhagh J F D and Morgan, C
A 1998
Digestibility Evaluation of food. In
Minitab 1998 GLM, Tukey, and 2 sample t-test. In Minitab reference Manual release 12.21. Minitab Inc.
Neelakantan S and Deodhar A D 1993 Biotechnical approaches of straw utilization by microbial systems for feed and industrial purposes. Feeding ruminants on fibrous crop residues. Kiran Singh and J.B. Schiere (Editor). pp248-256
Nguyen Van Thu and Udén, P 2003 Feces as
an alternative to rumen fluid for in vitro
digestibility measurement.
Ørskov,
E R, Hovell F
D De B
and Mould F
1980 The use of nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs.
Trop. Anim. Prod. 5: 195-213.
Robertson, J B and Van Soest, P J 1981 The detergent
system of analysis and its application to human foods. In the analysis os dietary fiber in foods. W P T
James and O Theander (Eds.). Marcel
Table Curve 2D v4, 1996 Table Curve 2D. Automated curve
fitting and equation discovery. Version 4.Jandel GmbH, Schimmelbursechstrabe 25.40699
Van Soest, P J, Robertson, J B and Lewis, B A 1991 Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle: methods for dietary fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3585-3597.