Sida-SAREC 1988-2003

Citation of this paper

   In vitro digestibility of rice straw after mushroom  cultivation and the utilization of nutrients of enriched rice straw
by Red Sindhi crossbred cattle

 

                                                          Nguyen Van Thu
 

Cantho University
nvthu@ctu.edu.vn

         

Abstract

 

Two experiments were carried out to investigate nutrient contents and in vitro digestibility values of  rice straw after it's use to cultivate mushrooms and to evaluate the effect of rice straw enriched by urea, molasses and minerals on in vivo digestibility and nutrient intake of cattle. In Experiment 1 a complete randomised design was used for the in sacco evaluation of rice straw at three stages: initial (R), at 20 days treated with water (RW20) and after harvesting mushrooms (MS). There were 8 replicates of each treatment. Faeces of a Murrah buffalo were  used as inoculant. In Experiment 2, four Red Sindhi crossbred cattle (138 ± 12 kg) were allocated in a 4 x 4 Latin Square design to four diets, which included rice straw (R), rice straw plus urea-molasses-mineral mixture (RS+UMM), urea-treated rice straw (URS) and urea-treated rice straw  plus molasses-mineral mixture (URS+MM).

 

The crude protein and ash in MS was higher and NDF lower than in R and RW20. In vitro digestibility values at 24 h were similar but were lower for MS at 96 h. The MS after drying was dark, dusty and had a bad smell and was not palatable to cattle. 

 

In Experiment 2,  adding urea, molasses and minerals to rice straw, or molasses and minerals to urea-treated rice straw,  increased intake, DM in vivo digestibility and N retention.

 

 Key words: Cattle, rice straw, mushrooms, digestibility, intake  
  

 

Introduction

 

The Mekong delta of Vietnam is the main rice bowl of the country, thus a large amount of rice straw is produced. Some is used for feeding ruminants, some is burned and the ash used as fertilizer, and a part of it is used for cultivation of mushrooms. The rice straw after harvesting the mushrooms is normally used as fertilizer. Neelakantan and Deodhar (1993) reported that white rot fungi (Actinomycetes) were able to biodegrade lignin and ligno-cellulose. From this arose the idea that growing mushrooms on rice straw might improve its nutrient value for feeding to ruminants.

 

Another approach to improving rice straw quality is to supplement it with molasses, urea and minerals (Thu and Udén, 2000).

 

This study, therefore, aimed to investigate: (i)  the nutrient content and in vitro digestibility values of the residue from straw used to grow mushroom; and (ii) and effect of supplementing rice straw with urea, molasses and minerals.
 

 

Materials  and methods

 

A complete randomized design was used to evaluate the nutritive value of rice straw used for growing mushrooms. Samples for analysis and in vitro digestibility were taken  at the initial stage (R), at 20 days after treatment with water (RW20) and after harvesting the mushroom (MS). There were eight replicates (batches of straw used for growing the mushrooms). Samples were analysed for DM, N and NDF by AOAC (1990) procedures and used to measure organic matter degradability by the in sacco method using faeces from Murrah buffalos fed natural grasses as inoculant (Thu and Udén 2003).

 

In the Exp.2 four Red Sindhi crossbred cattle (138 ± 12kg) were allocated in a 4 x 4 Latin Square design with four diets: rice straw (RS), rice straw  with added urea-molasses-mineral mixture (RS+UMM), urea-treated rice straw (URS) and urea-treated rice straw plus molasses-mineral mixture (URS+MM). Each experimental period was three weeks, including one week for adaptation. Feeds were offered twice a day at 7:15 and 14:15h. Feeds offered and refusals were collected daily and pooled weekly for analysis of DM to calculate feed intake. In vivo DM, OM and NDF digestibility values were estimated by total faecal collection for 7 d beginning 2 d after the start of feed intake recording (McDonald et al 1998). Rice straw was treated with 5% urea (100 kg straw, 5 kg urea, 100 kg water), and it was fed to experimental animals after 21 days of storage. Rice straw in the RS diet before feeding was added water to make it softer (36.8% water based on fresh matter basis). The RS+UMM diet included 1.2% urea, 10.6% molasses and minerals. For the URS+MM diet, 12.7% molasses and minerals were added 24hr before feeding.

 

In both experiments feed samples were dried at 105oC overnight to determine dry matter (DM). The OM was determined by ashing samples in a furnace at 500oC for 4 h. The crude protein was determined by the Kjeldahl method (AOAC 1980). Analysis of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was by a method described by Van Soest et al (1991). Acid detergent fiber (ADF) was analyzed by the method suggested by Robertson and Van Soest (1981). Feeds offered and refusals were collected daily and pooled weekly for analysis of DM to calculate feed intake. 

      

In Experiment 1, the data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of Minitab (1998). When the F test was significant (P<0.05), Tukey’s test for paired comparisons was used. The data from in vitro degradability were fitted to a non-linear model (Ørskov et al 1980):

DMD= a + b (1- e-ct ),

where DMD = DM disappeared after time (t), a = the intercept on the "y" axis, c= fractional degradation rate (h-1) and a+b = the curve asymptote  representing the potential degradability. The Table Curve 2D V4 program (Table Curve 2D V4 1987) was used for curve fitting. In Experiment 2 data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of Minitab (1998).
 

 

Results and discussion

 

Experiment 1

 

The cultivation  of mushrooms reduced the organic matter and NDF content of the straw but increased the crude protein content (Table 1).

   

Table 1. Changes in composition of rice straw during the cultivation of  mushrooms (on DM basis except for DM which is as % of fresh matter)

 

 

Initial

After 20 day

After harvesting mushrooms

Prob.

DM

91.8a

24.8b

23.5b

0.001

OM

86.7a

86.6a

80.2b

0.01

CP

6.30a

6.93a

9.23b

0.001

NDF

56.8a

57.3a

43.8b

0.01

ADF

42.2

42.8

45.7

0.01

Ash

13.3a

13.4a

19.8b

0.01

ab Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05

The OM degradability of the straw after mushroom cultivation was reduced after 96 h of incubation (Table 2) with no apparent changes at earlier times. After drying the final product it was dark in colour, dusty and had a bad smell. When it was offered to cattle they ate very little.  There appeared to be no relationship between the degradation parameters "a", "b" and "c" and the measured degradability values.  No changes in degradability are to be expected due to addition of water to the straw, and this was the case according to the degradation values even at 96h,  yet the "b" values were 30% less for this treatment according to the fitted curve parameter. Also the "c" value was higher for the residue after mushroom growing, than for the original straw, which is also in conflict with the observed values for OM loss and 96h degradability.

Table 2. In vitro OM digestibility values (%) of rice straw during cultivation of mushrooms

Incubation time, h

 Initial

After 20 days

After harvest

Prob.

0

22.2

22.1

24.2

ns

12

31.8

27.9

32.6

ns

24

34.2

33.2

37.3

ns

48

41.2

44.8

40.7

ns

72

44.6

47.0

44.1

ns

96

55.0a

55.0a

48.7b

0.01

Parameters of degradation curve

a

24.4

21.9

25.1

 

b

60.0

46.6

24.1

 

a + b

84.4

68.5

49.2

 

c

0.0068

0.0123

0.0259

 

ab Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05

 

 The effects of supplementation on the composition of the diets in Experiment 2 are in line with the nature of the treatments (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Composition of rice straw and supplemented rice straw in Experiment 2 (on DM basis except for DM which is as % of fresh matter)

 

RS

RS+UMM

URS

URS+MM

DM

57.7

60.5

64.0

65.9

OM

83.9

84.7

83.7

84.3

CP

7.43

12.5

11.3

11.2

NDF

49.4

41.2

48.8

41.2

ADF

50.9

49.4

57.5

59.3

Ash

16.1

15.3

16.4

15.6

 

The rice straw intake was increased by supplementation with molasses / minerals and by treatment with urea (Table 4), with highest values for the urea-treated straw supplemented with molasses and minerals. The high intake of crude protein on this latter diet was due to the increased DM intake,m as  both diets had the same concentration of crude protein (Table 3).

 

Table 4. Intake of rice straw, water, and crude protein and urine production of young cattle in Experiment  2.

 

RS

RS+UMM

URS

URS+MM

Prob.

Rice straw (kg DM/day)

2.22a

3.03b

3.0b

3.71c

0.001

Rice straw (g/kg LW/day)

15.2a

20.5b

20.7b

25.3c

0.05

Drinking water (kg/day)

8.5a

11.5c

10.2b

11.1b

0.001

Urine (kg/day)

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

ns

Crude protein (g/day)

162a

381c

341b

417d

0.001

ab Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05

DM and OM digestibility tended to be higher for all supplementation treatments compared with untreated rice straw but the improvement was only significant for urea-treated rice straw plus molasses / minerals (Table 5). NDF digestibility was higher for the two treatments with urea-treated rice straw compared with untreated straw. Nitrogen retention was increased by molasses / minerals supplementation with and without urea treatment. 

 

Table 5. In vivo digestibility coefficients (%) for DM, OM and NDF and nitrogen retention of young cattle in Experiment 2

 

RS

RS+UMM

URS

URS+MM

Prob.

DM

43.2a

47.8ab

53.4ab

57.0b

0.05

OM

39.9a

43.6ab

48.8ab

51.3b

0.05

NDF

55.5ab

50.9a

68.5c

63.8bc

0.01

N retention (% of N intake

9.45a

42.0b

39.6b

43.7b

0.05

abc Means without letter in common are different at P<0.05

 

The lack of difference in N retention between urea-supplemented (untreated) rice straw and urea-treated rice straw, when molasses / minerals were also fed, emphasis the importance of testing the two strategies in feeding trials to measure animal performance traits, since it is more economical and simpler to supplement the straw with urea than to "treat" it with urea.

 

 

Conclusions  

  • It appears that the residue from rice straw after mushroom cultivation is of lower nutritive value (contains 50% more ash) than the original straw and is likely to be of negligible feeding value for cattle

  • Addition of molasses and minerals to untreated rice straw supported the same N retention in cattle as when these supplements were added to urea-treated rice straw

  • There is a need to test the two strategies (molasses/minerals/urea supplementation of rice straw versus molasses/minerals supplementation of urea-treated rice straw) in feeding trials with growing cattle.

 

 

Acknowledgements

This research was partially financed by the bilateral SAREC 2000-2002 project.

 

References

 

AOAC 1980 Official Methods of Analysis. 13th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington, DC.

 

Chowdhury S A  and Huque K  S 1998  Effect of molasses or rice gruel inclusion to urea supplemented rice straw on its intake, nutrient digestibilities, microbial N yield, N balance and growth rate of native (Bos indicus) growing bulls. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 1998. Vol. 11, 145-151.

 

McDonald P, Edwards R  A, Greenhagh J F D  and Morgan, C  A 1998  Digestibility  Evaluation of food. In Animal Nutrition. Fifth edition Addison Wesley Longman, UK, pp. 221-237.

 

Minitab 1998   GLM, Tukey, and 2 sample t-test.  In Minitab reference Manual release 12.21. Minitab Inc.

 

Neelakantan S  and Deodhar A  D 1993 Biotechnical approaches of straw utilization by microbial systems for feed and industrial purposes. Feeding ruminants on fibrous crop residues. Kiran Singh and J.B. Schiere (Editor). pp248-256

 

Nguyen Van Thu and Udén, P 2003  Feces as an alternative to rumen fluid for in vitro digestibility measurement. Buffalo Journal. Thailand (in press).

 

Ørskov, E R,  Hovell F  D De B and Mould F 1980  The use of nylon bag technique for the  evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop. Anim. Prod. 5: 195-213.

 

Robertson, J  B and Van Soest, P  J 1981  The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In the analysis os dietary fiber in foods. W  P  T  James and O  Theander (Eds.). Marcel Dekker, New York. NY, pp. 123.

 

Table Curve 2D v4, 1996  Table Curve 2D. Automated curve fitting and equation discovery. Version 4.Jandel GmbH, Schimmelbursechstrabe 25.40699 Erkrath, Germany.

 

Van Soest, P  J, Robertson, J  B and Lewis, B  A  1991  Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle: methods for dietary fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3585-3597.

 

Go to top