ngamsaeng@hotmail.com
mod@mekarn.org
A feeding trial was carried out to evaluate the protein quality in water spinach or duckweed alone or mixed when included in a basal diet of broken rice for growing Muscovy ducks. There were three treatments, consisting in diets given ad libitum to 24 ducks: WS, water spinach plus broken rice (80:20 fresh basis); DW, duckweed plus broken rice (80:20 fresh basis) and MWD, water spinach and duckweed plus broken rice (35:45:20 fresh basis).
Total DM intake and total N*6.25 intake were highest for duckweed as the only supplement. Lowest values were with water spinach, with the mixed supplement (MWD) showing intermediate values. Average daily gain was highest for ducks fed diet DW (22.4 g/bird/day) and lowest when fed diet WS (6.2 g/bird/day). The growth rate of ducks was linearly related to total N*6.25 intake (R2 = 0.89). Feed conversion was poorer for diet WS and MWD compared with DW (9.1, 4.3 and 3.8 g DM/gain for diet WS, MWD and DW respectively).
It can be concluded that growth rate of ducks can be used to assay the protein quality from vegetables. Total DM intake, total N*6.25 intake, live weight gain and feed conversion were better when the ducks were fed duckweed rather than water spinach as a supplement to broken rice.
Usually, conventional feed such as soya bean meal has been used as a source of protein in diets for pigs and poultry. However, soya bean meal is expensive, which results in high costs of production. The use of local feed resources can be a way to raise the income and to improve the standard of living of smallholder farmers. In this connection, many researchers reported that duckweed and water spinach have potential as a protein sources when combined with energy-rich feeds which are low in fiber such as broken rice, cassava root meal, sugar cane juice (Becerra et al 1995; Bui Xuan Men et al 1995, 1996; Nguyen Duc Anh and Preston 1997; Du Thanh Hang 1998; Le Thi Men et al 1997; Le Thi Men 1999; Ly et al 2002).
Duckweed (Lemna minor) is a simple tiny water plant that grows very well on pond surfaces. It can tolerate high nutrient stress and appears to be more resistant to pests and diseases than other aquatic plants. Moreover, it has high protein and carotene contents (Bui Xuan Men et al 1995). The protein content of duckweed responds quickly to the availability of nutrients in a water environment (Leng et al 1995).
Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) is a vegetable that is consumed by people and animals. It has a short growth period, is resistant to common insect pests and can be cultivated either in dry or flooded soils. Moreover, it has been found that water spinach is a vegetable with a high potential to convert efficiently the nitrogen in biodigester effluent into edible biomass with high protein content (Kean Sophea and Preston 2001).
Biological methods are rather easier and cheaper than chemicals method to determine the nutritive value of feeds. Furthermore, biological response data are more useful, and more easily understood, as a basis of making recommendations to farmers. Nguyen Duc Anh and Preston (1997) showed that growth rate of the duckling can be used to assay quality of protein resources.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the protein quality in water spinach and duckweed fed alone, or mixed, as the only supplement to a basal diet of broken rice for growing ducks.
The experiment was conducted at the An Giang University,
Vietnam, during the rainy season, between 31 August and14
September, 2003. Environmental temperature during the experiment
averaged 27.3 °C, 31.8 °C and 27.7 °C at 6 am, 12
am. and 6 pm, respectively.
The experimental design was a Completely Randomized Design with two replicates per treatment. There were three treatments consisting of diets where broken rice was employed as the energy source, and different sources of vegetative protein as follows:
The animals were 24 Muscovy ducks of about 3 months of age. The ducks were raised in pens with thatched roofs and rice husk as a floor cover. Each pen accommodated 4 ducks and had 1.2 m² floor area. Feeders and drinkers used during the experiment were round plastic basins (28 cm diameter, 5 cm depth for feeders and 16 cm diameter, 3 cm depth for drinkers). Natural light was used during the day and electric bulbs at night.
The diets were prepared with 20% (on fresh basis) from broken rice and 80% (on fresh basis) from water spinach or duckweed or a mixture (35:45 on fresh basis) of both water spinach and duckweed. The broken rice, water spinach and duckweed were bought from the market and the prices were 2400, 1500 and 1000 VND, kg respectively. The water spinach was chopped finely before mixing with broken rice. Duckweed was mixed with broken rice without chopping. The ducks were fed ad libitum on each of the treatments. Feeds were offered twice daily at 07:00 am and 17:00 pm; water was freely available.
The content of crude protein was highest and of DM lowest in the duckweed (Table 1). The level of 31.3% crude protein in DM of the duckweed indicated that it was of good quality. Keansombath Lampheuy (2003) showed that the range of crude protein in unfertilized and fertilized (200 kg N/ha from biodigester effluent) duckweed was from 16.7 to 34.5% in DM.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the feeds | |||
|
DM, % |
N, % |
N*6.25, % |
Duckweed |
5.5 |
5.0 |
31.3 |
Water spinach |
11.9 |
3.6 |
22.3 |
Broken rice |
85.1 |
1.3 |
7.9 |
The calculated contents of DM and N*6.25 in dry basis of the diets ranged from 21.4 to 26.6% (for DM) and 12.7 to 13.1 for N*6.25 in DM (Table 3).
Table 2. Characteristics of the experimental diets |
|||
|
|
Treatments# |
|
WS |
DW |
MWD |
|
Ingredients, % fresh basis |
|
|
|
Water spinach |
80 |
- |
35 |
Duckweed |
- |
80 |
45 |
Broken rice |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Chemical analysis |
|
|
|
DM, % |
26.6 |
21.4 |
23.7 |
N*6.25, % in DM |
13.1 |
12.7 |
12.9 |
# WS, DW and MWD are water spinach, duckweed and mixed water spinach and duckweed, respectively |
The ducks were weighed at the start and afterwards at 5-day intervals. Feed offered and refused was recorded daily. Sample of feed offered and refused were taken every 5 days to determine N following procedures of (AOAC 1990) and DM by micro-wave radiation (Undersander et al 1993).
The data were analyzed by the General Linear Model (GLM) option of the ANOVA software of Minitab (version 13.31). Treatment means were compared using Least Significant Difference (LSD). The statistical model was
yij= µ + t i +
eij
where µ is the overall mean, t i is the treatment effect and eij is the experimental error
Total DM intake and total N*6.25 intake were highest for duckweed as the only supplement (Table 3). Lowest values were with water spinach, with the mixed supplement (MWD) showing intermediate values.
Table 3. Effect of water spinach or duckweed fed alone, or mixed, as supplements to broken rice for growing Muscovy ducks |
|||||
|
Treatments# |
SEM |
Prob. |
||
DW |
MWD |
WS |
|||
Feed intake, g DM/day |
|
|
|
|
|
Water spinach |
- |
12.4a |
20.2 b |
0.59 |
0.001 |
Duckweed |
17.3 a |
7.3 b |
- |
0.48 |
0.001 |
Broken rice |
66.6 a |
50.2 b |
35.7 c |
2.29 |
0.001 |
Total DM |
83.9 a |
69.9 ab |
55.9 b |
3.09 |
0.001 |
Total crude protein |
10.9 a |
9.1 ab |
7.4 b |
0.38 |
0.001 |
Liveweight, g |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
430 |
438 |
492 |
18.4 |
0.174 |
Final |
771 a |
691 a |
583 b |
18.0 |
0.012 |
Daily gain |
22.4 a |
16.7 a |
6.2 b |
1.21 |
0.006 |
Feed conversion, g DM/g gain |
3.8 a |
4.3 a |
9.1 b |
0.34 |
0.003 |
Feed cost/kg gain, VND## |
22410 |
25791 |
57394 |
- |
- |
# WS, DW and MWD are water spinach, duckweed and mixed water spinach and duckweed respectively |
|||||
## 15500 VND = 1 US dollar |
|||||
a,b,c Means without common superscripts in the same row are different at P<0.01 |
Average daily gain was highest for ducks fed duckweed as the only supplement and lowest for water spinach (Table 3). There was a linear growth response of the ducks to intake of total crude protein (Figure 1).
The results obtained in the current study clearly show that the growth rate of ducks was linear to total crude protein intake either derived from duckweed or from water spinach alone or both mixed when added to a basal diet of broken rice as source of energy. Nguyen Duc Anh and Preston (1997) also reported that the growth response of ducklings was linearly related with crude protein from duckweed or soya bean meal. Feed conversion was poorer for water spinach alone or mixed with duckweed (9.1 and 4.3 respectively), as compared to duckweed (3.8), which resulted in feed cost being lowest for duckweed.
Figure 1. Relationship between intake of
crude protein and growth rate of Muscovy ducks
Based on the results from this trial, it can be concluded that:
Acknowledgments
I am very grateful to MEKARN Program under SIDA-SAREC Project for giving me the opportunity to undertake this experiment. I would like to express sincere thanks to Dr. Thomas R. Preston from UTA and Dr. Julio Ly from the Swine Research Institute (Havana), who provided knowledge and valuable suggestions during the conduction of the trial. Special thanks are expressed to Mr. San Thy and Mr. Chhay Ty and to all my classmate of the MSc. Course, for helping in the field and the laboratory. I also wish to thank the An Giang University and in particular to the Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources for allowing me to use their experimental facilities.
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick, editor). Arlingtonpp 1230
Becerra M, PrestonT R and Ogle R B 1995
Effect of replacing whole boiled soya beans with azolla in the diets of growing
ducks. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 7(3):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd7/3/7.htm
Bui Xuan Men, Ogle R B and PrestonT R 1995
Use of duckweed (Lemna spp) as replacement for soya bean
meal in a basal diet of broken rice for fattening ducks. Livestock
Research for Rural Development. 7(3):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd7/3/2.htm
Bui Xuan Men, Ogle R B and PrestonT R 1996
Duckweed (Lemna spp) as replacement for roasted soya beans
in diets of broken rice for fattening ducks on a small scale farm
in the Mekong delta. Livestock Research for Rural Development
8(3):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd8/3/men831.htm
Du Thanh Hang1998 Ensiled cassava leaves and duckweed as protein sources for fattening pigs on farms in Central Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 10(3): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd10/3/hang2.htm
Kean Sophea and T R Preston 2001 Comparison of
biodigester effluent and urea as fertilizer for water spinach
vegetable. . Livestock Research for Rural Development. 13(6):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/6/Kean136.htm
Keansombath Lampheuy 2003 Manure or biodigester effluent as fertilizer for duckweed. Retrieved,
from MEKARN Mini-projects.
Leng R A, Stambolie J H and Bell R 1995
Duckweed - a potential high-protein feed resource for domestic animals and fish.
Livestock Research for Rural Development. 7(1):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd7/1/3.htm
Le Thi Men 1999 Evaluation of water spinach (Ipomoea
aquatica) for Baxuyen and Large White sows and fattening
crossbred pigs. Master in Science Thesis. SwedishUniversityof
Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala pp 71
Le Thi Men, Bui Hong Van, Mai Thi Chinh and
PrestonT R 1997 Effect of dietary protein level and
duckweed (Lemna spp) on reproductive performance of pigs fed
a diet of ensiled cassava root or cassava root meal. Livestock
Research for Rural Development. 9(1): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd9/1/lemen911.htm
Ly J, Hean Pheap, Keo Saeth and Pok Samkol 2002 The
effect of DL-methionine supplementation on digestibility and
performance traits of growing pigs fed broken rice and water
spinach. Livestock Research for Rural Development 14(5): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd14/5/ly145.htm
Nguyen Duc Anh and Preston1997 Evaluation
of protein in duckweed (Lemna spp) using a duckling growth
assay. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 9(2): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd9/2/anh92.htm
Rodriguez L and PrestonT R 1996
Use of effluent from low cost plastic biodigesters as fertilizer for duck weed
ponds. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 8(2):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd8/2/lylian2.htm
Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage
analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp
154