A Randomized Complete design was used to study growth rate of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as influenced by pond fertilization (0.133g N/m2/day) with effluents from biodigesters having hydraulic retention time of 10 (ERT10) and 30 days (ERT30). There were three replications (ponds of 6 m2 in area) of each treatment which was applied over a period of 120 days.
Growth rate and net fish yield were higher with ERT30 (0.43g/day and 1363 kg /ha) than with ERT10 (0.27g/day and 899 kg/ ha) after 120 days. Mean values for BOD5 were higher for the ERT10 treatment.
It is concluded that the improved fish productivity with effluent from biodigesters with 30 day retention times was probably due more to a lower BOD than to differences in ammonia-N levels.
Integrated aquaculture
is the comprehensive utilization of natural resources and ecosystems for the the
artificial rearing of aquatic animals and plants (Lin and Yang Yi 1999). The
integration of livestock with trees, food crops and aquaculture is seen as the
most appropriate technology to use the natural resources in a system that is
productive and sustainable according to Preston (2000).
In such a system the processing of the livestock manure by anaerobic digestion
is a key component as it has many positive benefits such as reduction in emission of
methane, which is a major actor in global warming (Preston and
Leng 1989), decrease in pathogens, better health of people and animals,
production of biogas for cooking (reduced pressure on forests for fuel wood;
more comfortable working conditions in the kitchen for women) and improved
nutrient recycling (reduced need for chemical fertilizer) (Preston and Rodriguez 1996 and
In all countries, one
objective of wastewater treatment should be the reduction, and if possible the
removal, of parasites, bacteria and pathogenic viruses that cause endemic
diseases. Ponds for water plant (Chará et al 1999) and for fish culture
are technological options through which such objectives can be realized. If the
only objective was to decontaminate water resources, most projects would
not be financially feasible. However, if the excellent bacteriological quality
of stabilization pond effluents is taken as an advantage, as well as the
nutrients it contains, benefits are jointly obtained for agriculture, livestock,
horticulture, aquaculture and forestation. The design of these systems should be adjusted
according to the effluent quality required for the intended usage. The use of wastewater
facilitates the efficient use of water, the provision of natural
fertilizers and food, the creation of employment sources and economic income,
and the expansion of agricultural frontiers in desert areas (Moscoso and Leon 2000).
The main products from the biodigester are biogas, and effluent is a potential fertilizer because the anaerobic digestion process results in conversion of organic nitrogen from manure to ionized ammonia (NH4+) which can be used directly by plant roots (Forchhammer 1994). Thus it has been found in Vietnam that the effluent was a better fertilizer compared with raw manure for application to cassava and duckweed (Le Ha Chau 1998a,b), although there are few reports of trials to compare the two sources of plant nutrients.
The objective of the present experiment was to obtain further evidence concerning the fertilizer value of biodigester effluent, and specifically to compare effluent produced by different retention times, when used in ponds for fish culture. The hypothesis underlying the design of the experiment was that increasing the retention time in the biodigester would produce effluent of superior nutritive value for use in fish ponds stocked with Tilapia.
.
The design and management of the plastic plug-flow
biodigesters was described by Santhy et al (2003). The influent was a
mixture of pig manure and water with a solids (DM) concentration of 60 g /litre,
which with hydraulic retention times of 10 and 30 days, was equivalent to a
loading rate of 3.06 and 1.02 kg DM manure per m³ of liquid volume of the
biodigester.
The
composition of the effluent for the hydraulic retention times of 10 and 30 days
was: total N content 1003 and 1066 mg N/ litre,
ammonia-N 486 and 636 mg/litre and ammonia-N to total
nitrogen ratio 0.50 and 0.60. Effluent was used for Oreochromis
niloticus with the quantity as below:
|
Table 1: Effect of
retention time on fertilizer values with constant manure concentration input
(6% or 60 g/L. liquid volume) |
|||
|
|
Manure |
Effluent (Retention time, days) |
|
|
|
10 |
30 |
|
|
pH |
6.48 |
6.95 |
7.05 |
|
DM, % |
29 |
1.95 |
2.21 |
|
OM, % |
79 |
74.0 |
71.5 |
|
Total N, mg/L |
26167 |
1003 |
1066 |
|
NH3 –N, mg/L |
620 |
486 |
636 |
|
NH3 –N in total
N |
0.02 |
0.50 |
0.60 |
|
COD Cr, mg /L |
X |
3.52 |
3.00 |
|
VFA, m-equiv/100g |
73.7 |
13.4 |
16 |
3.2. Fertilizing of
effluent
Effluent
as feed and fertilizer applied at the same level of nitrogen of 120 kg N/ha,
equal to 0.133g N /m2 /day and N in effluent was 1 and 1.1 g/ L
equivalent to 0.80 and 0.75 L/ m2 /d of treatments 10 and 30 days (table 2)
|
Table 2 :Quantities
applied to the ponds of effluent, total N and NH3-N |
||
|
|
Retention time, days |
|
|
10 |
30 |
|
|
N, g/litre
effluent |
1.00 |
1.10 |
|
Effluent, litres/m2/day |
0.8 |
0.75 |
|
N, g/m2/day |
0.133 |
0.133 |
|
NH3-N, g/m2/day |
0.0665 |
0.0798 |
3.3.
Experimental design
The experiment had 2 treatments with 10 or 30 days
retention time of effluent in the biodigester
and with 3 replications (total, 6 ponds). Effluent as feed and fertilizer
applied at the same N level of 120 kg N/ha, equal to 0.133g N /m2
/day. Ponds were 2m x 3m and 1 m deep, and were lined with cement and soil
mixture to avoid water leakage through the sandy soil.
3.4. Allocation of treatments
The Completed Randomized Design was used for
allocation of treatments and replications of the experiment (ERT10: effluent retention
time of 10 days, ERT30: effluent retention time of 30 days). Pond arrangement could
be two rows that depended on the location and space:
|
Table
3: Allocation of treatments |
||
|
ERT30 |
ERT10 |
ERT30 |
|
ERT10 |
ERT30 |
ERT10 |
Experimental length: the experiment was conducted last in total 120 days
weeks from 1st July to 6th Nov 2002
Effluent: The effluent was taken from each digester immediately
after charging with manure and water and was applied at intervals of three
days.
3.5. Management
3.5.1. Pond preparation: The bottoms of all ponds were applied with quick-lime
(CaO) at 100 g/m², 10 days
before stocking with fish. This liming is to eliminate parasites and pathogenic
organisms and to increase the pH (Sophin and Preston 2001). The ponds were filled with water 3 days after
liming.
3.5.2. Stocking density
Each pond will be stocked with one fish species at a
density of 2fish/m². The species was Tilapia (Oreochromis
niloticus) introduced
as fingerlings about 3-7 cm length.
3.6. Data collection and analyses
3.6.1.
Effluent: The effluent were analysed
twice weekly for DM, pH, OM, N, and Ammonia-N. The samples were taken before application of effluent to fishpond
every three days. Detail of the analytical methods employed
in the effluent samples appear elsewhere (San Thy et al 2003).
3.6.2.
Fish measurement
The experiment measured fish's growth rate by
measuring the length of fish and weight every 20 days in the morning at 8:00am
before loading the fertilizer. The fishes were caught with a seine net and put
in a small basket to measure the length and weight. The length from the tip of
the mouth to the caudal fin was measured with a graduate ruler. At the end of
the experiment the total fish biomass and the weight and length were
recorded.
3.6.3.
Water quality measurement
The oxygen level of the pond water was
measured every two days, two times during the day in the early morning at 6:00am
and in the afternoon at 2:00pm by a DO2 meter (Model 9150).
The DO2 meter was used for the measurement in the pond
directly. Before oxygen measuring was conducted the DO2 meter was
calibrated properly. Water samples were collected at the same place in each
pond at 20 cm depth and analyzed one by one. The pH of the pond water was measured every two days, two times a
day, in the morning at 9:00am and in the afternoon at 4:00pm
by a digital pH Meter (Model 410A). Water
temperatures was measured three days a week, three times a day in the
morning 6:00, 12:00 and 17:00 at a water depth of 20 cm. It was measured by a
thermometer submerged into the pond water and left for 5 minutes, after which
the reading was taken with the thermometer still in the water. Water transparency was measured every
2day in the midday by Secchi
disk. BOD was measured every 20 days, analytical method by using......................
4. Statistical analyses
The
data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) by using the General Linear
Model (GLM) of the MINITAB software (Release 13.3, 1998).
5. Result and Discussion
5.1. Water quality in
fishpond
|
Table 4: Water quality parameters |
||||
|
|
ERT10 |
ERT30 |
SEM |
Prob |
|
pH |
8.632 |
9.008 |
0.3820 |
0.347 |
|
Water transparency, cm |
30.04 |
25.55 |
2.7055 |
0.305 |
|
Water temperature, oC |
30.1 |
30.1 |
0.7846 |
0.999 |
|
BOD, mg/litre |
7.103 |
4.74 |
0.9670 |
0.022 |
|
DO. mg/litre |
3.738 |
3.801 |
0.5941 |
0.918 |
5.1.1. Dissolved Oxygen level (DO2)
Dissolved oxygen (DO) is oxygen gas (O2)
that is dissolved in water; most of it is produced during photosynthesis carried
out by aquatic plants and algae during daylight hours, declining during the
night and is lowest just before daybreak. If DO is below 5 mg/L, it may be
harmful to fish, and piping (gulping air at the surface) may be observed when
DO fall below 2 mg/L. Low level of DO are most frequently associated with hot,
cloudy weather, algae die-offs (Francis- Floyd 1997).
The
dissolved oxygen concentration, both treatments was very slightly different in
ponds fertilized with both kinds of effluent (P=0.918). During most of the
progressing period, the mean oxygen concentration in fishpond (Table 4) and DO2 from effluent retention
time of 30 days (ERT30) tended to be higher than ERT10.
According
to Swingle (1969), the minimum oxygen concentration should be
not less than 5 mg/ L. Values from 0.3 to 1mg/L over
an extended period were considered to be lethal to fish and from 1mg to
5mg/litre the fish will survive, but growth will be
slow. Hong Samnang
(1997), studied on the effect of pig manure and biodigester effluent on
fish growth in ponds with 6 fish species composition included tilapia and
divided into two groups, the range of oxygen level in pond received effluent from
3.8-11.9 mg/L group 1 and oxygen from 3.3- 10 for second group was higher than
pond received pig manure. In table below were observed the oxygen level from
previous experiments:
|
Table
5: The lists of previous experiment
on oxygen level of pond culture |
|||
|
Types
of culture |
Feed
and fertilizer |
DO2
mg/L |
Sources |
|
Farm
level, tilapia (4fish/
m2) |
Mixture
feed rice bran, fish meal (5% BW) |
3-20 |
Bolivar and Brown (1999) |
|
Sex-
reserved male tilapia (4.1 fish/m2) |
TSP,
urea |
2.40-3.52 |
Lin et al (1999) |
|
Oreochromis niloticu |
waste
and supplement |
above
3 |
Chapman (2000) |
|
Eemi-
intensive Tilapia |
feed
and inorganic fertilizer |
2.2
-4.5 |
Veverica et al (1999) |
|
Sex
reversed male tilapia (3 fish/m2) |
Urea
and 30% crude protein |
1-
10.6 |
Lin et al (2001) |
|
Oreochromis niloticus (2
fish/ m2) |
chicken
manure (500 kg/ ha), urea and TSP |
0.9-2.5 |
Lin et al (2000) |
5.1.2.
pH value
The pH of the pond water in amongst treatments was not
different (P = 0.347). This range of pH in both treatments was in the optimum
of growth (Table 4) according to Swingle (1969) (the appropriate pH range for good fish
growth is from 6.5 to 9). The values recorded by Pich Sophin and Preston (2001) within this range for all
treatments (fertilizer from effluent manure and U-DAP for poly-culture fish)
was 7.76-8.66, but in the effluent treatment it varied according to times from
7.79-8.66. Lin et al (1999) studied of tilapia growing
in ponds fertilized with TSP or urea and found that the pH varied in a very
wide manner from 6.5 as a minimum to 10.10 as maximum according to treatments
studied. On the other hand Bolivar and Brown (1999)
fertilized tilapia ponds, weekly with chicken manure supplement with urea and triple superphosphate
and reported water pH in ponds varying from 7.7-8.2. Lin
et al (2000) fertilized ponds with urea and report water pH pH ranges 7.7-10.3 and 7.6-10.4 related to the methods of
feeding.
The water quality of pH in water for tilapia was good in the range 6.0-8.5 (Chapman
2000). Alabaster and Lloy (1980) suggested
that fish are found in water having pH range from 4-10, with a good level from
5-9 and for maximum production from 6.5-8.5, whereas fish mortality is often
related to drop in pH. Besides the low pH reduced decomposition rate of organic
matter and inhibited nitrogen fixation. The range of the pH from 6.5-7.5 is
optimum for life of fish; the pH in manure was higher than pH in pond fed by effluent (Hong Samnang 1997).
5.1.3.
Water temperature
There were no differences between the treatments for
water temperature, the ERT10 was the same that what was observed for ERT30 (Table 4, figure 6). There were no differences between
treatments in fish poly-culture fertilized with effluent, chemical and fresh
pig manure at a temperature of 32 oC as it
was observed by Pich Sophin and Preston (2001)
In
other studies with growing tilapia, it was been measured temperature of
27.7-28.6 oC (Kwei
Lin et al 2000 and 28-32 oC, (Chapman 2000) Hong Samnang (1997) found value
of 25.4-28.8 oC.
Tilapia
is a robust fish, withstand high water temperature well and their respiratory
demand are slightly. Tilapia it is warm water fish the optimum development
occurs at the temperature about 20 0C or event up to 30oC
or more, and the lowest temperature they can withstand is between 12 and 13 oC (Marcel Huet 1986).
5.1.4.
Water transparency
The water transparency was not different amongst
treatments (Table 4). The same variation was observed in other Cambodian
experiment, with the lowest value for the effluent, followed by the chemical
fertilizer and fresh pig manure (19.4, 24.1and 21.1, cm) (Pich Sophin
and Preston 2001). In tilapia ponds were stocked at 2 fish m-2.
According to Lin et al (2000) water
transparency in pond could varied from 8.3-14 cm.
5.1.5.
Biochemical Oxygen demand
There was different BOD in fish ponds (P=0.022); the
high BOD values was for the treatment with less HRT (ERT10). It meant that
higher oxygen demand could not be good for fish ponds. It can suggest that the
long retention time of effluent in biodigester was good for fish and more oxygen
in fishpond as it can be observed in table 4. Wastewater was treated till it reached
the appropriate quality to obtain suitable fish for direct human consumption. In
this connection it has been found with four of tilapia, developed during the
warm and cold seasons of Lima climate. That the treatments system reduced total
BOD levels from 112 to 68 mg/l in fish pond (Moscoso and Leon 2000).
It
has been reported that dissolved oxygen concentrations significantly increased
when the ponds were fertilized with effluent as compared with fresh manure. Thus
the principal benefit of a preliminary anaerobic digestion of pig manure
appears to be the decrease in the BOD (biological oxygen demand) in the
effluent due to removal of carbon as methane in the digestion process (Pich Sophin
and Preston 2001).
All
the research results were higher and lower than our present study depending on
the condition such as fish stocking density, quantity and amount of fertilizer,
microenvironment and fish and pond-water composition and feed composition.
5.1.6.
Fish survival
During the whole experimental period of 120 days, the
survival rates tended to be higher in the ponds fertilized with ERT10 (100% of
fish survival) than ERT30 (97.22 %), but the difference was only significant in
the case of tilapia that growed faster in the pond
fertilized with 30 days retention time effluent (ERT10) as compared with the 10
days retention time effluent (ERT30) respectively.
5.1.7. Growth of length
Fish
growth of tilapias are increasingly with times, the length growth are different
between the treatment of 10 days, the gab of length growth of the 30 days
effluent retention time in biodigester is bigger than treatment of 10 days
(Table 6). This length growth might be faster from the age of 20-100 days than
from above 120 days of age.
|
Table 6 :Effect of effluent on growing of tilapias from
effluent different retention times |
||||
|
Length growth, cm |
ERT10 |
ERT30 |
SEM |
Prob |
|
Day of measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
initial, 0 |
8.33 |
10.15 |
0.417 |
0.037 |
|
20 |
10.08 |
10.58 |
0.197 |
0.146 |
|
40 |
11.30 |
11.17 |
0.376 |
0.814 |
|
60 |
12.24 |
12.69 |
0.610 |
0.630 |
|
80 |
13.01 |
13.34 |
0.525 |
0.679 |
|
100 |
13.41 |
13.89 |
0.318 |
0.343 |
|
120 |
13.84 |
14.86 |
0.325 |
0.090 |
|
DGL |
0.044 |
0.041 |
0.0011 |
0.100 |
|
Weigh gain by day
measurement, cm |
|
|
|
|
|
initial, 0 |
13.3 |
17.4 |
1.53 |
0.132 |
|
20 |
19.4 |
21.5 |
1.50 |
0.376 |
|
40 |
26.8 |
28.5 |
2.77 |
0.678 |
|
60 |
34.7 |
39.4 |
4.83 |
0.528 |
|
80 |
38.4 |
47.0 |
3.71 |
0.175 |
|
100 |
42.6 |
55.6 |
3.17 |
0.044 |
|
120 |
44.9 |
68.2 |
2.67 |
0.004 |
|
Daily weight gain |
0.27 |
0.43 |
0.017 |
0.004 |
|
Fish survive, % |
100 |
97.22 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Figure 1: The length growth of Tilapias effected by measurement
times |
|
|
|
Figure 2: Mean
daily growth length of tilapias in ponds fertilized with effluent |
5.1.8.
Fish production
Overall,
the faster growth rates were with from ponds fertilized with effluents of 30
days retention time, and the lowest with the 10 days effluent retention time (Table 6, 7 and Figures 1, 3 and 4). There were
differences in the response of the different the fertilizer treatments especially
ammonia-N in effluent. The tilapia growing
in the fertilized pond with 30 days effluent retention time duplicated growth
rate as compared with 10 days of effluent retention time.
Tilapia
grew faster in effluent with 30 days retention time than in effluent retention
of 10 days in ponds (Table 4, 7 and Figures 3 and 4). The final weights of 10
and 30 days effluent retention time of experiment (Table 6, 7) were 44.64 and
68.15g respectively. Effect of N and P budget in pond with differences in
fertilization was between 324g /fish and 248g/fish (Kwei Lin et al 2001).
The
fish yield per hectare was expressed as the net gain in total fish weight and
the gross out (Table 7). There were significant
differences among treatments, with highest values for the effluent treatment 30
and 10 days retention time. Compared with the effluent 10 and 30 days
treatments, the 10 days effluent fertilizer increased net yield 633.2 kg /ha equivalents
to 71% while the effluent treatment 30 days RTE increased 1015.04 equivalents
to 75%.
|
Table 7: Initial and final weight and length of tilapia |
|
||
|
|
ERT10 |
ERT30 |
Prob |
|
Initial length, cm |
8.33
± 0.59 |
10.15±0.05 |
0.04 |
|
final length, cm |
13.8±
0.45 |
14.9±0.09 |
0.09 |
|
Initial weight, g |
13.3±1.43 |
17.4±1.63 |
0.132 |
|
Final weight, g |
44.9±3.23 |
68.2±1.96 |
0.004 |
|
Total yield of fish, kg/ha |
898.9 |
1363 |
|
|
Increasing length, cm |
5.5 |
4.7 |
|
|
Increasin weight, g/ fish |
31.7 |
50.8 |
|
|
Total net fish yield, g/pond |
1139.9 |
1827.7 |
|
|
Total net fish kg/ ha |
633.3 |
1015.4 |
|
Veverica et al (1999) reported a net fish yield range at 1127- 2098 kg/ ha in
semi-intensive tilapia production system. Veverica et al
(2000) reported too that in a Oreochromis
niloticus and Clarias
gariepinu mixing culture, the maximum net fish
yield of tilapia were 1015- 2510 kg/ ha and range average weight of tilapia
from 23.1-70.5 g/fish in cool season and yield from 1119 -1520 kg/ha and the
mean growth in
the range 106-168g/fish in the warm season.
In
an aquaculture project using treated effluents from stabilization ponds, it was
possible to obtain 4 400 kg/ha of tilapia with an average weight of 250 g per
unit at the end of the summer, without adding artificial food. Growth was
reduced during winter time because temperature declined to 17 oC. In conventional farms of the Amazon region,
this production is obtained only when ponds are fertilized and concentrated
food is provided. The abundant biomass of algae in treated
wastewater replace artificial food, reducing production costs (Moscoso
and Leon 2000).
Increased
productivity in polyculture
fish ponds when biodigester effluent, rather than
manure, was used as fertilizer was reported by Han Yuqin and Ding Jieyi (1983). Yields of
fish were increased by 26% when the effluent
was applied compared with the original manure. Processing pig manure in an
anaerobic biodigester, before using it as fertilizer
for ponds stocked with a fish polyculture, resulted in a 55% increase in net fish growth compared
with direct application of the fresh manure (Pich Sophin and Preston 2001).On
the other hand, Hong Samnang
(1997), studied the effect of pig manure and biodigester effluent on
fish growth in ponds with 6 fish species including tilapia and found that fish
yield was higher in effluent pond than in manure pond. Others Nguenga et al (1997) have found an improvement in fish
production in dependence of organic or natural pond fertilization.
Nagdi et al (1998) studied a evaluation the possibility of recycling on
tilapia fertilized chicken litter, urea-super phosphate and mixture feed 25%
protein were stocked 2 fish/m2 , the yield was highest in chicken
litter of 19.81kg /ha/day equivalent to 0.99g in daily. Comparison of tilapia
monoculture and carp poly culture fertilized with cow manure and supplement
inorganic matter the net fish yield was 0.53 g/fish (Hassan et al 1997). A researched on increasing level
of fertilizer (Control, urea plus TSP) on Nile tilapia, the average growth of
0.2g /fish/day. There was significant increases in total ammonia-N, pH,
nitrate-N and there were no significant different in final weight of fish (Abdalla 1997). Diana et al (1996)
the ponds were stocked at 3 fish/m2, feeding with fertilizer 1.17g
daily, growth fish reached 500g, , the most efficiency
system was growing fish 100-150g with fertilization alone with subsequent
addition of feed.
|
|
|
Figure 3: Effect of the effluent different retention time on
growth Tilapias |
The
results of this experiment showed that the productivity of the ponds was
relatively low, if compared with the potential when pond inputs are optimized.
According to Knud-Hansen et al (1991) and Lin et al (1997)
the optimum inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus for fish culture are 4 kg
N/ha/day and 1 kg P/ha/day or 400 mg N/m2 and 100 mg/m2
per day, respectively. The quantity of N recommended by these authors is almost
4 times higher than what was used in the present study (about
1 kg N/ha/day). In a report by Lin et al (1998),
the growth rate of tilapia was 0.24 and 0.30 g per day in earthen ponds loaded
with 429 mg N/m2/day and 114 mg P/m2/day and with a
stocking density of 10 and 5 fish/ m2,
respectively. In contrast, in the present study, the N application was only
0.133 g N/m2/day and the growth rate of the Tilapia at a stocking
density of 2 fish/ m2 was 0.25 g/day with 10 days retention time effluent
increasing to 0.43 g/day with the effluent 30 days retention time table 6. Processing pig manure in an anaerobic
biodigester, before using it as fertilizer for ponds stocked with a fish polyculture,
resulted in a daily grow of tilapia were 0.35 and 0.5 g/day increase in effluent compared with direct
application of the fresh manure(Pich
Sophin and Preston 2001).A research on
integrated biogas technology by using slurry for fish culture from biodigester
effluent different hydraulic retention time of 50-70, 70 and 30-50, stocking
density is 5 fish/m2 and supplement commercial pellets. The final yield
of tilapia the rang between treatments was from 27.52- 41.14 g in 6 months(DWG
of 0.15-0.23g ) (Edwards et al 1988) ( Thus the
growth rates of the Tilapia were higher in our study but stocking rates, and
hence in general productivity still was lower.
Kwei Lin et al (2000)
observed that if tilapia ponds were fertilized weekly with chicken manure at a
rate of 500 kg ha-1
supplemented with urea and triple superphosphate
to provide 28 kg N ha-1 wk-1 and 7 kg P/ ha/ week; cover
different area in wet season dependence
of the types of the pond covering in the wet season, at a content stock density
2 fish m-2 at a size of 19.0 ± 1.0 g, the mean daily weight gain
were 0.67, 0.47, 1.10, 0.43 and 1.57 g/fish/day and pond varied from 8.3-14 cm.
Fertilized
in shallow pond (1 m depth) and in deeper pond (2.5 m) was developed for
culture Nile tilapia by using chicken manure fertilizing to pond with and
without water addition. Fish stocking at 2 fish/m2 and with an initial
weight of 15g, resulted after 234 days in high yield when pond were weekly
fertilized with additional water the daily weight was 0.86 g equivalent to 3830
kg/ha (Diana and Lin 1998).
|
|
|
Figure 4:
Daily growth rate of tilapias |
5.1.9. Growth rate of fish
and ammonia nitrogen in total nitrogen of effluent
It
was expected in this experiment that. Since the hypothesis resulted to be valid
increasing the retention time could increase the proportion of organic nitrogen
converted to ammonia-N in the effluent and effluent from biodigesters
with longer retention time could have a higher fertilizer value (ammonia-N) for
growth of fish (figure 4). it should be recommended
that effluent may not only be have as inorganic fertilizer since it contain the
organic materials from the digestion of bacteria that fish can use as food to
grow (Rakocy and Ginty 1989).
5.1.10. Effect of effluent
on water quality, primary production and fish growth
There is the same water temperature in the average and
dissolved oxygen is not significant different table 4.
NH3-N and the NH3-N in total N was higher in ERT30 than
in ERT10 so these were given the result produced more phytoplankton and
zooplankton as primarily product for fish feed. Moscoso and Leon, (2000)
reported that high production of algae ranged from 573 to 718 mg/l of
chlorophyll A, according to the climate. Total ammonium ranged between 2.62 and
0.45 mg/l, which are tolerable values for Nile tilapia. Effluent characteristic in table 1 and 2 could be concluded that
the higher ammonia nitrogen is the more primary production. The relationship
between primary production and yield of tilapia, ponds were fertilized with
high and low level of nutrient from chicken and urea. Pond received high
fertilizer input exhibited higher nutrient level in water, higher primary
productivity and higher fish production than pond treated with low input of
fertilizer (Diana et al 1989).
6. Conclusion and
Recommendation
Acknowledgements
References
Abdalla AAF 1997. Effect of increasing fertilization on water quality and yield of
Alabaster and Lloy
1980. Proceeding of the FAO/
IPT workshop on Integrated Livestock fish Production system ,
16-20 Dec 1991
Buras, Netty, Duek, Lea, Niv, Sara, Hepher, Balfour, Sandbank, Enrico 1987. Microbiological aspects of fish grown in treated wastewater. Water Research, 21 (1):1-10.
Chará J, Pedraza Gloria and Conde Natalia 1999
The productive water decontamination system: A tool for protecting water resources in
the tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development (1)
Lin CK, Madhav
K Shrestha, Yang Yi and Diana SJ 1999. Developments in integrated aquaculture in
Lin CK, Yang Yi, Hoang Tung, and Diana SJ 1999. Global Experiment: Optimization of Nitrogen
Fertilization Rate in Freshwater Tilapia Production Ponds during Cool Season.
Eighth Work Plan, Feeds and Fertilizers Research 1T (8FFR1T). Final Report.
http://pdacrsp.orst.edu
Lin CK, Yang Yi, and Diana SJ 2001. The Effect
of Management Strategy on Nutrient Budgets, Interim work plan, Global
experiment, Thailand. http://pdacrsp.orst.edu/pubs/admin/
Lin C Kwei,
Yang Yi, Hong Tung and Diana S James 2000. Effect of Mud Turbidity on
Fertilization, and an Analysis of Techniques to Mitigate Turbidity Problems in
Wet Season. Eighth Work
Diana JS and Lin CK 1998. The effect of fertilization and
water management on growth and production of
Diana JS, Lin CK, Yi Yang and Yi Y 1996. Timing of Supplement feeding for tilapia production. Journal
of the world Agriculture Society 1996:27: 4, 410-419, 14.
Ding Jieyi and Han Yujin 1983. Comparative
studies on the effects of fresh pig manure and anaerobically fermented pig manure upon fish
farming, p: 288-296.
Chapman FA 2000. Culture
of Hybrid Tilapia: A Reference profile. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/BODY_FAO12
Hong Samnang 1997. The effect of pig
manure and biodigester effluent on fish growth in ponds. Reional Seminar-workshop, on Better use of locally
available feed resources in sustainable livestock- based agriculture systems in
South- East Asia.
James E Rakocy and Andrew S McGinty 1989. Pond culture of tilapia,
Southern regional
Diana SJ, schneeberger
P J and Lin CK 1989. Relationship between primary production and yield of tilapia.
CRSP research report .
Moscoso Julio and Leon Guillermo 2000. Treatment and sanitary use of
wastewater and Wastewater use in aquaculture. HDT 60: Wastewater use
Karen L. Veverica,
Jim Bowman, Tom Popma 2000. Optimization of Nitrogen Fertilization rate in
freshwater Tilapia
production Pond. Progress report eight work plan, Kenya Research 1 (8FFR1K)
Karen V, Bowman J, Gichuri W, Paul Izaru, Petricia Mwau and Thomas Popma 1999. Relative Contributiion
of Supplemental feed and Inorganic Fertilizer in Semi- intensive Tilapia
production. Final report eight work plan ,
Kenya Research 3 (8KR3).
Knud-Hansen C F, McNabb C D and Bartterson T R 1991 Application of limnology for efficient nutrient utilization in
tropic pond aquaculture. Verh.
Internat. Verein Limnol.,
24:2,541-2.543.
Le Ha Chau 1998, Biodigester effluent versus manure from pig or cattle
as fertilizer for production of cassava foliage (Manihot
esculenta)
Leng
R A 1999. Duckweed,
A tiny aquatic plant with enormous potential for agriculture and environment.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation
Lin
C K, Teichert-Coddington D
R, Green BW and Veverica K
L 1997 Fertilization regimes. In:
H.S. Egna and K.L. Boyd
(Editors), Dynamic of pond aquaculture. CRCP
Press,
Lin
C K, Yang Yi, Shivappa R B
and Kabir Chowhury M A 1998 Optimization of Nitrogen Fertilization Rate in
Freshwater Tilapia Production Ponds.
PD/A CRSP Sixteenth Annual Technical Report, P: 49-56
Marcel Huet 1986. Breeding and
Cultivation of Fish. Text book of Fish Culture.
Nagdi ZA, Al Nady
MA, El Shaie MM and Megid
SAA 1998. The effect of heavy fertilizer -feed
input on the ecology and production of
Nguenga D, Breine JJ, Yong SS, Teugels GG and OllevierF 1997. Effect of animal manure and
chemical fertilizer on the growth and survival of tilapia cameronensis
holly in
Edward P, Polprasert
C, Raput V S and Pacharaprakiti
C 1988. Interated Biogas Technology in the Toropics 2. Use of Slurry for Fish Culture. Waste
management and research.
Preston T R
and Leng R A 1989 The greenhouse
effect and its implications for world agriculture. The need
for environmentally friendly development. Livestock Research for Rural Development (1)
Remedios Bolivar and Chris Brown 1999. Timing of the Onset of Supplemental Feeding of Tilapia in Ponds.
Ninth Work Plan, Feeds and Fertilizers Research 4 (9FFR4), Progress Report
Freshwater Aquaculture Center
Floyd RF 1997. Dissolved Oxygen for Fish
Production, Cooperative extension service,
Hassan S, Edwards P and little DC 1997.
Comparison of tilapia monoculture and carp poly culture in fertilized earthen
ponds. Aquaculture and aquatic system , School of
environment, resources and Development.
Swingle H S 1969 Methods of analysis for waters, organic matter and
pond bottom soils used in fisheries research. Auburn, AL: Auburn University